1 / 20

THE CONFIGURATION OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTATE IN RICE PRODUCTION IN WEST AFRICA

THE CONFIGURATION OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTATE IN RICE PRODUCTION IN WEST AFRICA. Patrick Kormawa (WARDA, Cotonou) and Tunji Akande (NISER, Ibadan). INTRODUCTION. Agriculture is the heart of West African economy – 70% of population live on it Instrumental value of agriculture at independence :

kittys
Download Presentation

THE CONFIGURATION OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTATE IN RICE PRODUCTION IN WEST AFRICA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE CONFIGURATION OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTATE IN RICE PRODUCTION IN WEST AFRICA Patrick Kormawa (WARDA, Cotonou) and Tunji Akande (NISER, Ibadan)

  2. INTRODUCTION • Agriculture is the heart of West African economy – 70% of population live on it • Instrumental value of agriculture at independence : • Employment • Income • Import substitution

  3. New functions of agriculture • Food • Fibre • Income • Employment • Export earnings through value added activities • Poverty alleviation

  4. Food is a problem in West Africa • Supply and demand gaps in food exist • Food prices are high • Imports are inevitable • Food-related infant ailments are rive • Poor nutrition leads to poor productivity • Food security is illusory

  5. Rice has now become prominent in West African economy and society • Demand for rice is growing at about 5% per annum; faster than for any other grain • Rice imports is growing at 8% per annum • Rice is now food for both rich and poor • Increasing demand due to Urbanisation Changing life style Changing work patterns Rice availability and prices impact on the welfare of the poor.

  6. Objective of the paper This paper reviews studies which assessed comparative advantage in the production of rice in West Africa. The ultimate intention is to provide a guide to how rice expansion programme can be effectively coordinated in the region to achieve the desired self-sufficiency status, as well as promote intra-regional trade.

  7. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK The major theoretical and analytical models contained in the literature and studies conducted on comparative advantage are as follows: • Linear Programming model • Non-linear Activity (Programming) model • Leontief Input-Output model • Regression model • Simulation-based model • Domestic Resource Cost model

  8. DOMESTIC RESOURCE COST • Domestic Resource Cost (DRC) has been extensively used in the past 25 years in West Africa. • Typically, the DRC establishes empirically the existence or non-existence of comparative advantage in the production of tradable commodities like rice among producing regions from the perspective of trade in the world commodity system. • The model also measures the pattern of efficiency imposed upon the production system by the prevailing trade policy regime.

  9. Incentives and Protection • Government policies can serve as incentives or disincentives to local rice producers. The structure of incentives to producers in each country is measured using the concepts of net private profitability (NPP), and the effective protection coefficient (EPC). The net private profitability makes use of gross margin analysis

  10. III. REVIEW OF SELECTED STUDIES • THE STUDIES CONDUCTED IN THE 1980s • PEARSON et al (1981) • ONYENWEAKU (1980) • AKINYOSOYE (1988) • WORLD BANK (1986)

  11. II. STUDIES CONDUCTED IN THE1990s • A. AKANDE • B. RANDOLPH et al • These studies and others not currently available for review were based on DRC methodology which measures social profitability.

  12. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – FINDING 1 • Not all countries producing rice in West Africa are doing so at socially profitable levels. That is, not all the countries demonstrate the capacity to produce rice at an economically competitive level.

  13. The countries that have demonstrated the possibility of translating their natural resources to a comparative advantage production status are: Sierra Leone Mali Niger Nigeria Burkina Faso

  14. Finding 2 Not all techniques of production can lead to comparative advantage. However there is overwhelming evidence from the studies reviewed indicating that small scale farms which generally use simple tools and equipment in addition to manual labour are economically competitive, whereas large-scale fully-mechanised production practices are not.

  15. Finding 3 • Yield levels and production costs strongly influence comparative advantage, irrespective of the techniques of production or regions where the farmer is located.

  16. CHALLENGES The present patterns of comparative advantage have thrown up certain planning and policy issues: First, economic integration envisioned for West Africa must be made practical through taking an advantage of agricultural production in selected areas in the region, which have demonstrated comparative advantage.

  17. The challenge for planning is obvious. No one is sure of how much land any of the prospective countries can further devote to rice cultivation. • The capability of supplying other required inputs including capital is also yet to be explored.

  18. Policy must focus on: • Breeding programmes to produce high-yielding varieties, • Effective adoption strategies, • Improved farm management practices by rice producers, • Efficient milling and improved market infrastructure

  19. FURTHER WORKS NEEDED • There are still gaps in information on comparative advantage in the region • Resources will be sought to pursue this issue • Target is to have comparative advantage maps of West Africa for planning purposes

  20. THANK YOU • MERCI !

More Related