1 / 16

2. Project Meeting London, 10/11 March 2009 Veit Bürger, Öko-Institut e.V.

WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options Methodology, detailed working plan, distribution of work. 2. Project Meeting London, 10/11 March 2009 Veit Bürger, Öko-Institut e.V. Tasks. Task 4.1: Description of selected support options

kitty
Download Presentation

2. Project Meeting London, 10/11 March 2009 Veit Bürger, Öko-Institut e.V.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP4: Assessment of nationalRES-H/C Policy OptionsMethodology, detailed working plan, distribution of work 2. Project Meeting London, 10/11 March 2009 Veit Bürger, Öko-Institut e.V.

  2. Tasks • Task 4.1: Description of selected support options • Task 4.2: Qualitative assessment of selected support options • Task 4.3: Stakeholder Dialogue I • Task 4.4: Assessment of the effectiveness and economic efficiency of selected support options • Task 4.5: Stakeholder Dialogue II • Task 4.6: Policy recommendations and implementation strategies • ------------------------------------------------------------------ • Task 6.2: National Dissemination Conferences www.res-h-policy.eu

  3. Task 4.1: Description of selected support options (1) • for each of the 7 target countries/regions 3-5 RES-H/C support instrument options will be selected and described in detail • the selection of the support options will be based on the provisional indication of the effectiveness of different policy options subject to task 2.2 (= policy options report D4) • the architecture of the selected instruments will be designed as to fit to the national context in which the instruments will be embedded • description of instruments will include all major processes underlying the support system as well as the detailed institutional set-up (Which institutions will be involved? What is their specific role?) • outcome (instrument descriptions) will be part of D9 (part 1 of D9) www.res-h-policy.eu

  4. Task 4.1: Description of selected support options (2) www.res-h-policy.eu

  5. Task 4.2: Qualitative assessment of selected support options (1) • for each target country/region each of the selected instrument options from task 4.1 will be qualitatively assessed against a variety of different criteria, including • stakeholder views • support of long-term perspectives (-> technology split) • level of investment security • administrative/organisational synergies with other policy instruments • analysis of the interaction with related policies (e.g. buildings standards, CHP) • qualitative criteria will be provided in form of a working document (D10) • main findings of this task will be added to D9 (part 2 of D9) www.res-h-policy.eu

  6. Task 4.2: Qualitative assessment of selected support options (2) www.res-h-policy.eu

  7. Task 4.3: Stakeholder Dialogue I (1) • main findings of task 4.2 will be subject to a stakeholder dialogue • elements of stakeholder dialogue: • stakeholder consultation (methodology: email questionnaire, interviews,…);  20 responses required! documentation in form of concise synthesis reports (D11) • consultation workshop in each target country/region (documentation D12);  15 external participants! • selection of 3-5 support instrument options from tasks 4.1/4.2 will be narrowed down to 2 instruments • these instruments will then undergo a profound quantitative analysis (task 4.4) www.res-h-policy.eu

  8. Task 4.3: Stakeholder Dialogue I (2) www.res-h-policy.eu

  9. Task 4.4: Assessment of the effectiveness and economic efficiency of selected support options • carrying out a detailed assessment of the effectiveness and economical efficiency for each target country/region and each of the 2 instruments identified in task 4.3 • development of the technology split • costs: quantification of the direct impact on the state budgets + transaction costs (in particular those resulting on the authorities' side) • benefits in terms of reduced GHG emissions, growth in RES-H/C capacities and avoided fuel costs, direct impact on employment (no full macroeconomic assessment!) • methodologies: amongst others INVERT (building sector), detailed methodology discussion at PM3 • results will be documented in D13 www.res-h-policy.eu

  10. Task 4.5: Stakeholder Dialogue II • organisation of consultation workshops in each target country/region on the effectiveness and economic efficiency of the 2 selected support options (documentation D14) •  15 external participants per workshop! www.res-h-policy.eu

  11. Task 4.6: Policy recommendations and implementation strategies • based on findings of tasks 4.2-4.5 selection of one support instrument for each target country/region • development of policy recommendations and implementation strategies specifically designed for the target countries/regions (target group: policy sector) • recommendations include • the specific design of the proposed instrument embedded in a concise policy package (institutional set-up, governance structure) • recommendations as to how to best adapt the new instrument to the existing policies which already address the RES-H/C sector • development of implementation guidelines • outcome: policy reports summarising policy recommendations and the corresponding implementation guidelines (D15) www.res-h-policy.eu

  12. Schedule for tasks 4.4 – 4.6 www.res-h-policy.eu

  13. www.res-h-policy.eu

  14. Role and contribution of partners (1) • Oeko • WP Coordinator • responsible for the working paper on qualitative assessment criteria for RES-H/C support options (D10) • presenting at first consultation workshop per target country/region on RES-H/C policy implementation experience in DE • EEG, ESV, CRES, LEI, ECN, KAPE, UNEXE • responsible for policy processes in target countries/regions(tasks 4.1-4.6) • responsible for organising the stakeholder consultation + consultation workshops in the target countries/regions • responsible for data collection for Invert modelling (task 4.4) • jointly with EEG and Fraunhofer ISI responsible for cost benefit analysis (task 4.4) www.res-h-policy.eu

  15. Role and contribution of partners (2) • EEG • adaptation and application of the simulation model INVERT (task 4.4) • ECN • responsible for the task 4.4 assessment for the non-building sector • Fraunhofer ISI • contributing to working paper on qualitative assessment criteria for RES-H/C support options, adaptation and application of the simulation model INVERT (task 4.4) • ULUND • presenting at first consultation workshop per target country/region on the experience with the implementation of DH systems in SE • contributing to working paper on qualitative assessment criteria for RES-H/C support options www.res-h-policy.eu

  16. www.res-h-policy.eu

More Related