1 / 17

Semi-direct test example – acceptable to NAA (ACG)

Semi-direct test example – acceptable to NAA (ACG). Short overview. Requirements for our acceptance of ANY digital LP – test program on the market:. Concept: No commitment for any test provider – performance based acceptance..

kirk-moon
Download Presentation

Semi-direct test example – acceptable to NAA (ACG)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semi-direct test example – acceptable to NAA (ACG) Short overview

  2. Requirements for our acceptance ofANY digital LP – test program on the market: Concept: No commitment for any test provider – performance based acceptance.. • Must be compliant with established legal framework (Circ 318 Ch 4) • Must have realistic contents and scenarios – • Must be easy to use, focus on web based CBT program • Program must include data protection and test result storage system • Program must have an access option for quality control reasons • Examiner must be able to use program and rate matrix to establish a documented test result by himself • Fast and easy to evaluate the test results in a serious, documented way • Must contain aeroplane and helicopter topics • Must contain an advanced module / EN L 5 + 6 • Must have access posibility for second examiner (Q- Reasons) • Must be listed on our NAA / or ICAO acceptance list ( starting 2011 )

  3. Philosphy Test must be designed to assess SPEAKING and LISTENING proficiency abilities in accordance with each component of the ICAO language proficiency rating scale and the holistic descriptors. ICAO standard phraseology should be used whenever possible but when phraseology is not applicable pilots and air traffic controllers should demonstrate also PLAIN ENGLISH. The minimum skill level requirements are embodied in the ICAO language proficiency rating scale. LEVEL 4 is considered the minimum level of proficiency to ensure an acceptable level of safety.

  4. Login

  5. Administrative Data

  6. Examiners can manage their candidates. There is no limit for the amount of candidates or exams.

  7. Chooseexam type randomgenerator

  8. Question pool contains a huge number of questions grouped in eleven categories to ensure a wide range of high quality scenarios. Any question released must first be approved by two SMEs and one linguist.

  9. Rating – digital test

  10. Interview

  11. Level 6 First rater may review his ratings, but once he has handed it over to the second rater, he cannot make changes anymore

  12. SAFA EN L 4 Competence Check(RMK: This is not an LPT!) Trigger: • SAFA Inspector is unable to communicate with the pilot / crew during inspection or an • ATC incident was evident during arrival of aircraft Finding: SAFA „G“ finding is considerd as initially „NOT ACCEPTABLE RISK“ in regard to SSP and AIP! Consequence: Crew must be changed, or must demonstrate EN L 4 competence prior release of aircraft

  13. SAFA Login

  14. Result

  15. Administrative accountto manage examiners

  16. ?

More Related