1 / 9

Virtual Imaging Peripheral for Enhanced Reality

Virtual Imaging Peripheral for Enhanced Reality. Aaron Garrett, Ryan Hannah, Justin Huffaker , Brendon McCool. General Constraints. Implementing a Kalman Filter Requires interfacing with Accelerometer Gyroscope Magnetometer Camera Process Module Ultrasonic Module

kirima
Download Presentation

Virtual Imaging Peripheral for Enhanced Reality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Virtual Imaging Peripheral for Enhanced Reality Aaron Garrett, Ryan Hannah, Justin Huffaker, Brendon McCool

  2. General Constraints • Implementing a Kalman Filter • Requires interfacing with • Accelerometer • Gyroscope • Magnetometer • Camera Process Module • Ultrasonic Module • Fast update rate optimally all sensors ~40 times a second • Clean Packaging, device must be worn

  3. BlockDiagram

  4. BlockDiagram • Requires Band Pass filter centered at 40 kHz • Voltage Comparator to read incoming pulse • Possible output signal amplification requried • Assuming • Approximate distance is ~2 meters • Speed of Sound ~340 m/s • ~0.00588 seconds or ~6 ms flight time • Transmit time of ~16ms • Then max data rate 62.5 samples/sec • <2% error requires uCclk > 8503 Hz • Requires 40 kHz PWM burst from uC • Signal needs to amplified to ~5-10V • Burst length of about 5ms

  5. BlockDiagram Time stamp Transmit and receive data rate faster then Ultrasonic data rate

  6. BlockDiagram • Optimal data rate for camera and processing ~40Hz • Data rate of ~10Hz more likely • Minimize error by increasing angle resolution • Larger pixel resolution the better • Large amount of data being transferred • Increased performance requires buffering • large enough Flash or Sram to buffer data into • Possible uC we found AT91SAM7S64 • ARM7 • Possibly could use an ARM9 more effectively

  7. BlockDiagram • Small package to fit on glasses • Accelerometer 3 axis • MMA8452Q • 12bit ±2g, ->0.488mg sensitivity • I2C interface 1.5 to 800 Hz data rate • 1.95 V to 3.6 V supply voltage • Gyroscope 3 axis • ITG-3200 • 16-bit ±2000°/sec • I2C interface • 3.9 – 8000 samples/sec • 2.1 V to 3.6 V supply voltage • Magnetometer 3 axis • MAG3110 • ±1000 μT range • 0.10 μT sensitivity • I2C interface • Output data rate up to 80 Hz • 1.95 V to 3.6 V supply voltage

  8. BlockDiagram • Read incoming data • Update Kalman Filter Equation • Accel max ~800 times/sec • Gyro max ~8000 times/sec • Mag max ~80 times/sec • Ultrasonic max ~70 times/sec • Visual max ~40 times/sec • Update graphics • Optimal about ~30 fps

  9. Project-Specific Success Criteria • The ability to communicate time stamp data usingRF between the base unit and head unit. • The ability to display images to the video glasses. • The ability to calculate estimate of angle and position of head unit using accelerometer, gyroscope, and compass. • An ability to find angle displacement of head relative to IR beacon origin using glasses mounted camera. • An ability to find distance from base to head unit using ultrasonic emitter and receiver.

More Related