1 / 24

BIG RESULTS NOW! (BRN) General Budget Support Annual Review Meeting 18 th November 2013

BIG RESULTS NOW! (BRN) General Budget Support Annual Review Meeting 18 th November 2013. Presentation by The President’s Delivery Bureau (PDB). Julius Nyerere International Convention Centre. Outline. Background Implementation Status BRN Financing Challenges.

kirima
Download Presentation

BIG RESULTS NOW! (BRN) General Budget Support Annual Review Meeting 18 th November 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BIG RESULTS NOW! (BRN)General Budget Support Annual Review Meeting18th November 2013 Presentation by The President’s Delivery Bureau (PDB) Julius Nyerere International Convention Centre

  2. Outline • Background • Implementation Status • BRN Financing • Challenges

  3. Tanzania Development Vision 2025 • Transforming Tanzania into a middle-income country imbued with the following characteristics: • high quality livelihood; • peace, stability and unity; • good governance; • educated and learning society; and • competitive economy • Transform the economy from a predominantly agricultural one to a diversified and semi-industrialized economy with a substantial industrial sector • Review of TDV2025 in 2010 – 2011 Revealed that: • We had succeeded in improving some areas especially in macro-economic management, e.g.:

  4. GDP growth of 7%, • Inflation rate of 6%, • food self sufficiency index at 100%, • respectable progress in improving quality of life by way improving the delivery of social services (education, health, water) • and instituting good governance and rule of law • But there were also significant shortcomings in that • There was no significant poverty reduction (Head count index declined from 35.7 in 2001 to 33.6 in 2007) • The achievements fell short of TDV 2025 intermediate targets • Vision is still valid • Need to address prioritisation and M&E in implementation

  5. GoT Response:Resuscitate long term planning • Long Term Perspective Plan 2011/12-2025/26 (LTPP 2011/12-2025/26) formulated • Objective: • To ensure that the country’s resources are organized and used strategically to guarantee the realisation of the development aspirations of Tanzania’s Development Vision 2025 (TDV 2025). • Put the country on a rapid, inclusive and sustainable growth trajectory and in so doing position the country on a sure path to realising the development aspirations outlined in the TDV • Implementation : • Implementation of LTPP divided into three five year development plans (FYDPs), each with a theme to underpin the thrust and priority interventions.

  6. The First Five Year Development Plan 2011/12-2015/16 (FYDP I) • Theme: • “Unleashing Tanzania’s Latent Growth Potentials” • Objective: • To unleash the country’s growth potentials in order to fast-track the provision of the basic conditions for high, broad-based and pro-poor growth. • Strategy: • Undertaking deliberate interventions that will remove the binding constraints on the country’s ability to exploit its strategic growth opportunities. • The Second Five Year Development Plan 2016/17-2020/21 (FYDP II) • Theme: “Nurturing and Industrial Economy” • The Third Five Year Development Plan 2021/22-2025/26 (FYDP III)

  7. Big Results Now! (BRN) Initiative … local efforts to deliver on Development Vision 2025 … inspired by Malaysian experience – Big Fast Results! Experience from Malaysia showed that big results can be achieved fast through the “delivery lab” methodology… • Malaysia launched a transformation program in 2009 –known as “Big Fast Results” (BFR) to realize its vision of becoming a high-income country by 2020 • The approach was centred around ‘delivery labs’ for priority areas and the Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU) was established to run and monitor the programme • The delivery lab methodology has delivered significant results in less than 3 years in Malaysia on 18 national key economic areas, such as • Street crime reduced by 39% from 2010 to 2011 • Implementation of a new MRT urban transport system providing >11% of total travel across Kuala Lumpur 6

  8. Big Results Now! (BRN) Programme … local efforts to deliver on Development Vision 2025 … inspired by Malaysian experience . . . inspired by the Malaysian experience, Tanzania launched its own BRN initiative in February 2013 His Excellency President Kikwete visited Malaysia and was introduced to PEMANDU’s delivery lab methodology The Government of Tanzania expressed interest in adapting the methodology to and implementing it in Tanzania. This was followed by senior officials’ study tour. High level Cabinet Retreat on BFR methodology and approval of the same to be adapted and used in Tanzania High level Cabinet Retreat approved establishment of Delivery Unit, 6 focus areas (NKRAs) and operationalisation of Selected Labs Launch of the Big Results Now approach and Lab Process. Cabinet endorses lab recommendations and Ministers sign performance contracts Big Results Now Open Day Establishment of President’s Delivery Bureau and Ministerial Delivery Units (MDUs); Appointment of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of PDB Appointment of Deputy CEO for Agricultural Delivery MoU in support of BRN Support System Programmeand Project Document of Catalyzing Agricultural Development in Tanzania signed between government and development partners; Recruitment processes for PDB and MDUs initiated. June2011 Sept 2012 Aug2012 Oct 2012 Feb 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 Aug 2013 Sep/Oct2013

  9. Big Results Now! Initiative • Initiative of the government aimed at establishing a strong and effective system to oversee, monitor and evaluate the implementation of its development plans (particularly the FYDP I) and programmes based on Malaysia’s Big Fast Results approach, which hinges on: ruthless prioritisation; detailed monitoring tools; and accountability for performance. • Mainstreaming BRN • The impact of the Big Results Now initiative will be felt as resulting initiatives are implemented through the Annual Development Plans for the years 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 which are the channels through which FYDP I is also being implemented.

  10. BRN…an integral part of TDV 2025 • Overarching development goals • Launched 2000 MKUKUTA Long Term Perspective Plan (LTPP) FYDP I FYDP II FYDP III BRN BRN BRN • Education NKRA • Water NKRA • Energy NKRA • Agriculture NKRA • Resource Mobilization NKRA • Central Corridor Transport NKRA • Catalytic projects with big fast results • 2013/14 Annual Dev. Plan • 2014/15 Annual Dev. Plan • 2015/16 Annual Dev. Plan

  11. 1 Strategic Direction 1. Identifying and working on National Key Results Done through Multiple Cabinet retreats, finally 6 NKRAs picked 2  Labs 3 Establish in detail what needs to be done; conducted in White Sands Hotel, 22/02 – 5/04/2013  Open Day  4 4 Shared lab output with general public and got feedback- 24/05/2013 at National Museum Grounds BRN Roadmap  Inform the public by publishing what is going to get done in tiny detail (getting pregnant!) 5 KPI targets Setting KPIs for the managers of the process (6 Ministers), available POPC website (www.mipangotz.go.tz).  6 6 Imple- mentation …6 out of 8 steps in BFR have been undertaken in BRN Imple- mentation Problem solving, on the ground implementation  7 IPR/ Audit External validation on results achieved 8 Annual Report • Informing the public delivery over the period.

  12. Lab Process What? • An iterative process for addressing difficult issuesand accelerating solution development • To solvecomplex issue / problems; • To syndicate to ensure alignment:Key stakeholders are engaged early and continuously (~every 2 weeks) • To createtransparencyand remove silosin resolving bottlenecks and implementing solutions • To securecommitment:Critical stakeholders sign off on plans and are accountable for the implementation Why? Who? • Key stakeholders (20-30 people)from the relevant public, private and civil society organisations relevant to solve the defined problem How? • Cross-organizational team works full-time in one location(6-8 weeks) • The lab involves intense problem-solving, supported by a facilitator team through: Learning(fact finding, research, identifying best practices and success stories); Analysis(Data analysis and number-crunching, Stakeholder analysis, root cause analysis) Brainstorming for solutions(Intervention design, follow-up on outstanding Issues, documentation and data entry); and Discussions and debriefs (outcomes from external meetings and discussions, syndications) Output • A “3-feet“ level (detailed) implementation programme, including agreed solutions, detailed execution plan with responsible stakeholders, targets, and delivery mechanisms to ensure implementation

  13. Firstwaveoflabswereconductedfrom February18toApril5, at the White Sands Hotel WEEK2 (Feb25-Mar1) Problemdefinitionand prioritisation WEEK3 (Mar4-8) Keychallenge identification WEEK4 (Mar11-16) Bigideas brainstormingandsolutionidentification WEEK5 (Mar18-21) 10,000 ft implementation programmewriting WEEK6 (Mar25-28) 1,000 ft Implementa-tionprogrammewriting WEEK7 (Apr2-5) 3 ftimplementa-tionprogrammewriting Detailbudget WEEK8 (Apr8-12) Finalisation&documentation Detailbudget WEEK1 (Feb18-22) Lab preparation Thelaboutputincreased deliverycapabilitiesforparticipantsandmomentumforinitiatives

  14. Big Results by 2015 • 25 commercial farming deals for paddy and sugarcane • 78 collective rice irrigation and marketing schemes • 275 collective warehouse-based marketing schemes Agriculture • Pass rate of 80% for primary and secondary school students • Improve students’ mastering of 3R in Standard I and II by implementing skills assessment and training teachers Education • Increase generation capacity from 1,010 to 2,260 MW • Access to electricity to 5 mil more Tanzanians • Eliminate EPP reliance Energy • Passage of 5 mil tons per year through the Central Corridor • Increase port throughput by 6 mil tons, rail by 2.8 mil tons • Reduce road travel time from 3.5 to 2.5 days Transportation • Sustaining water supply to 15.2 mil people • Restoring water supply to 5.3 mil people • Extending water supply to 7 mil new users Water Resource mobilisation • Increase tax revenue by Tsh 3 trillion • Implementation of PPP projects valued at Tsh6 trillion

  15. 1 Strategic Direction 1. Identifying and working on National Key Results Done through Multiple Cabinet retreats, finally 6 NKRAs picked 2  Labs 3 Establish in detail what needs to be done; conducted in White Sands Hotel, 22/02 – 5/04/2013  Open Day  4 4 Shared lab output with general public and got feedback- 24/05/2013 at National Museum Grounds BRN Roadmap  Inform the public by publishing what is going to get done in tiny detail (getting pregnant!) 5 KPI targets Setting KPIs for the managers of the process (6 Ministers), available POPC website (www.mipangotz.go.tz).  6 6 Imple- mentation …6 out of 8 steps in BFR have been undertaken in BRN Imple- mentation Problem solving, on the ground implementation  7 IPR/ Audit External validation on results achieved 8 Annual Report • Informing the public delivery over the period.

  16. 2. Establishing the Delivery System • Objectives • Problem-solving and solution generation: • critical first step in the overall delivery process where action plans are developed and implementation ownership is assigned. • Takes place both during the labs and throughout the process of implementing lab initiatives. • Implementation and execution support: • Additional support and capacity to ensure execution of lab initiatives on a line by line basis • Performance management: • monitoring and evaluation as well as performance reporting to ensure the accountability and delivery • Design and implementation of special projects • these are specific issues and/or requests in the overall delivery system that can be investigated or solved without the intensity and rigour of a lab environment.

  17. BRN Delivery Structure

  18. Implementation in NKRAs: Energy • 5 • 39 • 100 • 25 commercial farming investments for paddy and sugarcane • 78 smallholder rice irrigation and marketing schemes • 275 smallholder warehouse-based marketing schemes Education 64% Relevant after 2013 • Pass rate of 80% for primary and secondary school students • Improve students’ mastering of 3R in Standard I and II by implementing skills assessment and training teachers • 1,010 • 1, 200,000 • Increase generation capacity from 1,010 to 2,260 MW • Access to electricity to 5 mil more Tanzanians • EliminateEPP reliance • 1,073 • 124,567

  19. Implementation in NKRAs: Passage of 5 mil tons per year through the Central Corridor • Increase port throughput by 6 mil tons, • Increase rail tonnage by 2.8 mil tons • Reduce road travel time from 3.5 to 2.5 days 1 0.6 3.1 Transport-ation

  20. Implementation in NKRAs: Water 22.7 2.2 4.9 16.34 0.11 1.03 • Sustaining water supply to 15.2 mil people • Restoring water supply to 5.3 mil people • Extending water supply to 7 mil new users • Increase tax revenue by Tsh3 trillion • Implementation of PPP projects valued at Tsh 6 trillion 1.26 trillion 950 billion Resource Mobilisation

  21. Implementation in Delivery Structure • PDB Leadership in place. • 6 MDUs established. • 3 NKRA Steering Committees operational. • 3 Problem solving meetings chaired by Prime Minister. • BRN approach rolled out to MDAs and LGAS • TDC has met once

  22. Funding for Implementing NKRAs • Analysed budget gap: • Total for 3 years: - TZS 17.3 Trillion (USD 10.3 BN) • Of which requirement in • 2013/14: - TZS 4.862 Trillion (USD 2.9 BN) • Available in budget (GOT • + DPs): - TZS 1.957 Trillion (USD 1.17 BN) • Budget Gap 2013/14:- TZS 2.905 Trillion (USD 1.73 BN) • Strategies to address the gap: • Identifying internal savings (limited scope). • Invite private sector (PPP) for suitable projects. • Reach out to DPs to align programmes.

  23. Budget alignment and resource mobilisation • Procurement • Regulatory Permits • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) • FDA Permits • TBS Certificates • Legal and Court Processes • Skilled Staff

  24. Asanteni Sana!!

More Related