The Application of Open Space Learning in the AHECS Employability Module. Dr. Nicholas Johnson 26 June 2014 AHECS Biennial 2014 • NUI Maynooth. OK, let’s get on our feet. Or, why is a Beckett scholar talking to AHECS? • Past engagement with TCD Careers Service & this research area
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Dr. Nicholas Johnson
26 June 2014
AHECS Biennial 2014 • NUI Maynooth
Or, why is a Beckett scholar talking to AHECS? Employability Module
• Past engagement with TCD Careers Service & this research area
(my own department, AHECS 2012, “Knowing What We Know” 2013)
• Physical actor training — ”Speaking Without Language” —
has wide applications
(Disability Service, Medicine, CAPSL, Human Rights)
• Collaborations with Warwick, especially Jonathan Heron
(IATL, Beckett Summer School, Beckett Laboratory)
• Specific consultation on open-space pedagogy with the AHECS Employability Workgroup (2014)
• Learning should be grounded in discovery, enquiry and action, with a stress on the development of social intelligence• Learning flourishes best in flexible and non-hierarchical spaces that encourage collaboration• Learning should be affective and interpersonal, recognising both cognitive and embodied knowledges• Learning activities should acknowledge disciplinary knowledge as provisional, problematic and ‘unfinished’• Learning environments and pedagogies should favour interdisciplinary collaborations and multiple learning styles• Learning environments should be constituted as public spaces for the free exchange of ideas between participants in which learning is negotiated, and the protocols of the space are freely determined and amended by them.
(IATL, Warwick University)
DOMINANT since the action, with a stress on the development of social intelligenceENLIGHTENMENT
(and still dominant in the Academy):
VIEW FROM ABOVE (objective)
anchored in formal axioms, theories, paradigms
secured in print & organized by/around text
knowing that _____, knowing about ______
SUBORDINATE and REPRESSED:
VIEW FROM GROUND LEVEL (subjective)
active, intimate, hands-on, participatory, personal
rooted in embodiment, orality, community
knowing how ______, knowing who ______
SCIENCE versus “OLD WIVES’ TALES”
“To action, with a stress on the development of social intelligencebegin with, notice that the abstract/concrete dialectic is one of prehension, representing two different and opposed processes of grasping and taking hold of experience in the world – either through reliance on conceptual interpretation and symbolic representation, a process I will call comprehension, or through reliance on the tangible, felt qualities of immediate experience, what I will call apprehension.”
David A. Kolb (1984), 29
“ action, with a stress on the development of social intelligenceThe embodied nature of OSL begins, in very practical ways, to move us beyond the dilemmas and contradictions of idealism and empiricism, as mind and body, unified, promote an infinitely more memorable and integrated learning experience for students and tutors. Pedagogical theory and practice begin, perhaps, to catch up with recent thinking in psychology and neuroscience that increasingly foreground the holistic nature of body and brain.”
Monk et. al. (2011), 123
“Open” in the sense of spatial construction action, with a stress on the development of social intelligence
(a “third space” — see Kolb, Vygotsky, Bhaba)
“Open” in the sense of exterior relations
(in sense of economics, politics — see Boal, Freire)
“Open” in the sense of power: “Uncrowning”
Monk, Nicholas, Carol ChillingtonRutter, JonothanNeelands, and Jonathan Heron. "Open-space Learning: Practice into Theory.” Open-space Learning: A Study in TransdisciplinaryPedagogy (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011), 116–134.
• Consultations with stakeholders and huge efforts of Employability Workgroup have created an innovative, interdisciplinary module.
• Modes of learning in OSL and workshop-based pedagogy are much more responsive to contemporary careers environments and what is valued, thus contributing to employability.
• Careers Services can be at the cutting edge of pedagogical practices within the university, serving their position at one of many “trans” spaces:
Transitional, Transactional, Transgressive, Transfigurative, Transcendent,
Trans-Rational, Trans-Cultural, Transdisciplinary.
• Research opportunities arise within a recognized and highly progressive framework in teaching-and-learning theory, as well as in careers theory.
Workshop B: I think, therefore I am… employable? Employability Workgroup have created an innovative, interdisciplinary module.
Exercise 6: Walking Debate
The debate consists of the two opposing statements:
“Get real – circumstances determine career success”
“Keep smiling and play to your strengths”
The first statement is based on opportunity structure theory, which foregrounds the role of socio-economic structures in career development.
The second is drawn from the positive psychology approaches discussed earlier.
An information sheet is issued to all participants in relation to each statement.
Built Environment Employability Workgroup have created an innovative, interdisciplinary module.
Anxiety may arise.
Two ways to think about this:
Legacy of Teacher-Student Relation
(in old model)
Positive potential role of anxiety & struggle