1 / 37

η ’ photo-production off nucleons

η ’ photo-production off nucleons. - Some evidence of D 15 (2080) in the reaction. Xian-Hui Zhong Hunan Normal University In collaboration with Qiang Zhao. Why we study η ’ photo-production?.

kineta
Download Presentation

η ’ photo-production off nucleons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. η’ photo-production off nucleons -Some evidence of D15(2080) in the reaction Xian-Hui Zhong Hunan Normal University In collaboration with Qiang Zhao

  2. Why we study η’ photo-production? • The threshold energy of the η’ photo-production is above the second resonance region, which might be a good place to extract information of the less explored higher nucleon resonances around 2.0 GeV. Thus, the study of η’photo-production becomes an interest topic in both experiment and theory.

  3. Recent progress in η’ photo-production : Experiments

  4. CLAS Results γpη’p PRL 96, 062001 (2006) K. Nakayama et al,PR C 73, 045211 (2006)

  5. K. Nakayama et al analyzed the data, they predicted a bump structure in the total cross section at 2.09 GeV . If this is confirmed, the D13(2080) and/ or P11(2100) resonance may be responsible for this bump. PR C 73, 045211 (2006)

  6. CLASResults γpη’p PR C 80, 045213 (2009) A bump around 2.1GeV in the forward angle of the exciting function.

  7. CLASResults γpη’p Total cross section A bump around 2.1GeV in the cross section. PR C 80, 045213 (2009)

  8. CLASResults Differential cross sections PR C 80, 045213 (2009)

  9. CBELSA/TAPS Results γpη’p PR C 80, 055202 (2009) Total cross section No obvious structure around 2.1GeV in the cross section.

  10. CBELSA/TAPS Results PR C 80, 055202 (2009) Differential cross sections

  11. CBELSA/TAPS Results Photoproduction of eta’ meson off the deuteron Eur.Phys.J. A47 (2011) 11 A bump-like structure appears around 2.1 GeV in the cross section.

  12. CBELSA/TAPS Results γpη’p

  13. γnη’n CBELSA/TAPS Results

  14. II. Our analysis of the γpη’p and γnη’n in the chiral quark model Based on our previous work: Xian-Hui Zhong, Qiang Zhao, Phys.Rev. C84 (2011) 045207

  15. Chiral quark model Zhenping Li, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 23 ,1127 (1997); Qiang Zhao, PRC.63.035205(2001) Reggeized model Wen-Tai Chiang and Shin Nan Yang et al, PhysRevC.68.045202 (2003) meson exchange model K. Nakayama and H. Haberzettl, PRC.69.065212 (2004); PRC73, 045211 (2006). A. Sibirtsev et al, arXiv:nucl-th/0303044 Some other models …

  16. Differential cross sections of γpη’p The exp. data can be described within the framework of chiral quark model.

  17. Total cross sections of γpη’p The contributions of D15(2080) (n=3) can explain the bump structure around 2.1 GeV.

  18. The role of D15(2080)in thedifferential cross sections Switching off D15(2080), the bowl shape of the differential cross sections are less obvious. The sudden change of the shape around 1.9 GeV is due to the contributions of D15(2080).

  19. Further evidence of D15(2080)in theexciting function In the forward angle region, there is an obvious peak in the cross sections. This peak is due to the contributions of D15(2080).

  20. The predicted beam asymmetry

  21. Differential cross sections of γnη’n

  22. Total cross section for γnη’n

  23. Total cross section for γdη’np

  24. The predicted exciting function γnη’n

  25. Why does D15 play a dominant role in the n=3 shell resonances, rather than D13?

  26. The resonance amplitudes CGLN form

  27. CGLN amplitudes for n=3 shell resonances

  28. CGLN amplitudes for n=3 shell resonances

  29. At very forward and backward angles, the magnitude for D15 is about an orderlarger than that of D13! At very forward and backward angle regions, the angle distributions are sensitive to the D15 partial wave.

  30. Evidence of D15(2080) might exist in the other processes : γpηp γpK+Λ(1520) J/ΨN antiN π……

  31. CB-ELSA Result γpηp PRL 94, 012004 (2005), Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 427-439 (2005) E. Klempt et al fit the data, they suggested that D15(2070) was required in the analysis of the data of the γpηp differential cross sections!

  32. Jun He et al, PR C 78, 035204 (2008) Jun He et al also found some effects from a D15(2090) by analyzing the γpηp data with the chiral quark model.

  33. BESII Result J/ΨN antiN π PRL 97, 062001 (2006) BESII observed a structure around 2060 MeV in the πN invariant mass spectrum, which may be one or more ofthe long-sought missing Nstar resonance.

  34. LEPSResults γpK+Λ(1520) LEPS observed a structure around 2.11 GeV in the cross sections. Phys.Rev.Lett.104:172001,2010

  35. The bump is not well reproduced by theoretical calculations introducing a nucleon resonance with J P≤3/2, This result suggests that the bump might be produced by a nucleon resonance possibly with JP≥ 5/2 or by a new reaction process, for example an interference effect with the photoproduction having a similar bump structure in the cross sections. [Phys.Rev.Lett.104:172001,2010] Recently, Ju-Jun Xie and J. Nieves analyzed the data, they claimed that the inclusion of the nucleon resonance D13(2080) leads to a fairly good description of the new LEPS differential cross section data. [Phys.Rev.C82:045205,2010]

  36. III. Summary • The exp. data for eta’ photoproduction can be well described in the chiral quark model. • There is strong evidence of D15(2080) in the γpη’p.

  37. Thanks !

More Related