1 / 18

Lab-measurement results on IZM thin assemblies

Lab-measurement results on IZM thin assemblies. Mathieu Benoit . Outline. Assembly process Methodology Results . Sensor production and procurement : Bumping at IZM. Micron Sensor Wafer were sent to IZM for Under-Bump Metallization and assembly to Timepix and Medipix3RX ASIC

kimama
Download Presentation

Lab-measurement results on IZM thin assemblies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lab-measurement results on IZM thin assemblies Mathieu Benoit

  2. Outline • Assembly process • Methodology • Results

  3. Sensor production and procurement: Bumpingat IZM • Micron Sensor Wafer were sent to IZM for Under-Bump Metallization and assembly to Timepix and Medipix3RX ASIC • 10 Sensor wafers processed by IZM • Thickness: 100,150,200,300,650,1500 um • wafer <= 200 um thickness attached to handle wafer for processing 100um-on-100um assembly

  4. Methodology • After wire-bonding, chip is powered, sensor biased at 40V • Chip threshold equalization is performed twice, mask pattern is written to disk • First equalisation lead to weird masked pixel pattern (checkboard) • Second equalization works usually fine • An image of a Sr90 source is taken with Exposure time of 30s (every pixel should see some energy deposition) • A simple algorithm count how many pixel see no or too little signal (<20% of neighbors) and compare to mask

  5. C03-W0126 (100-on-100um) Masked pixels

  6. C03-W0126 (100-on-100um) Sr90, 30s Exposure 229 masked pixel in C03-W0126 35567 pixel with no Sr90 in C03-W0126

  7. J08-W0126 (100-on-100um) Masked pixels

  8. J08-W0126 (100-on-100um) Sr90, 30s Exposure 56 masked pixel in J08-W0126 56 pixel with no Sr90 in J08-W0126

  9. J10-W0126 (100-on-100um) Masked pixels

  10. J10-W0126 (100-on-100um) Sr90, 30s Exposure 190 masked pixel in J10-W0126 195 pixel with no Sr90 in J10-W0126

  11. K04-W0126 (100-on-100um) Masked pixels

  12. K04-W0126 (100-on-100um) Sr90, 30s Exposure 52 masked pixel in K04-W0126 52 pixel with no Sr90 in K04-W0126

  13. K05-W0126 (100-on-100um) Masked pixels

  14. K05-W0126 (100-on-100um) Sr90, 30s Exposure 28 masked pixel in K05-W0126 39 pixel with no Sr90 in K05-W0126

  15. K06-W0126 (100-on-100um) Masked pixels

  16. K06-W0126 (100-on-100um) Sr90, 30s Exposure 31 masked pixel in K06-W0126 31 pixel with no Sr90 in K06-W0126

  17. Conclusion • New assemblies show pretty good yield for the bumping of 100um ASIC to 100um Sensors (5/6 perfect sensors) • Only one assembly with a catastrophic failure, plan to send it back to IZM for further X-Ray study, chip was fine before wire-bonding • Ian mention that assemblies were quite fragile • Maybe lift-off occurred during wire-bonding process • 4 more assemblies with 150um n-in-p on 100um currently at the bonding lab This is now our thinnest full functional module we ever did using this technology.I forwarded this results immediately to all colleagues involved in this task. Thomas Fritzsch, IZM

  18. Unconnected pixels Hitmap, 100 on 100 um Assemblies

More Related