1 / 18

BRAND OF QUALITY

BRAND OF QUALITY. 1. Association of Providers of Social Services in the Czech Republic Hartmann RICO. 2. BRAND OF QUALITY DAY CARE CENTRES. External quality audit - experience from abroad Qualit ä tssiegel - Austria MDF - Germany Level of excellence (Great Britain) Iceland. 3.

kholloman
Download Presentation

BRAND OF QUALITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BRAND OF QUALITY 1

  2. Association of Providers of Social Services in the Czech RepublicHartmann RICO 2

  3. BRAND OF QUALITYDAY CARE CENTRES • External quality audit - experience from abroad • Qualitätssiegel- Austria • MDF - Germany • Level of excellence (Great Britain) • Iceland 3

  4. BRAND OF QUALITYDAY CARE CENTRES • BrandofQuality in Social Services • Principles • Qualityfrom user´s perspective • Voluntarity • Transparency • Possibleimpacts: • Motivation to qualityimprovement • More intense focus on users • Adaptationofreimbursement 4

  5. BRAND OF QUALITYDAY CARE CENTRES • 5 KEY AREAS, 266 CRITERIA, 1000 POINTS • ACCOMODATION • BOARDING • FREE TIME, CULTURE • PARTNERSHIP • CARE 5

  6. BRAND OF QUALITYDAY CARE CENTRES • BrandofQuality in theCzechRepublic • June, 21, 2011 – PressConferencewiththeMinisterofLabourandSocialAffairs • Certificationstarted as ofJuly, 1, 2011 • Media presentationoftheproject • Qualityofaccomodation services 6

  7. BRAND OF QUALITYDAY CARE CENTRES • Pilot verificationofBrand Q • Altogether 12 oldpeople´s homes • Individualcapacityof 10 – 400 beds • Regional, municipal, churchfacilities • RESULT • 2 - 4(5) STARS 7

  8. Criteria for entry into the auudit • User´s option to lock own room. • Users free to move around the facility. • Three- and multiple bed rooms account for less than 30% of the capacity • Barrier-free entry into the building and onto the floors. • The facility has no walk-thourgh rooms.

  9. COURSE A) PRIOR EVALUATION BY THE CERTIFICATOR: • Questionnaires of users´ satisfaction • Questionnaire for providers • Questionnaire for family members • Sending ancillary documents – food schedules, lists of activities, …… DURING THE CERTIFICATOR´S VISIT: 1. Discussion with users: new, immobile and oriented 2. Discussion with staff: nurses, ancillary care givers 3. Discussion with management 4. Inspection of facility

  10. 1. Accommodation We evaluate especially : environment, conditions and level of accomodation. Pleasant and functional equipment in rooms and social spaces. • Room (size, entry, toilette, bathroom, signalling devices, fridge, own furniture, shading, pet) • Social space • (common rooms, barrier-free, equipment of elevator, space for creative activities, bathroom) • Building(orientation system, chapel, cleanness, pleasant environment) • Surroundings(within 200 m from day care centre, garden, parking, transport) • Services (café, hairdresser, room cleaning, bank account management)

  11. 2. Food and Boarding We evaluate especially: Quality and standard of boarding, including offer of special diet. • Choice of meals • (choice from multiple meals and beverages, ensured nutrition care, varied offer of meals, possiblity to set graininess • Strucure and meal serving times • (number of meals, time-flexibility of meal serving, choice of place of consumation) • Culture and form of boarding • (table setting, cleanness, decoration, serving, culture of serving food to bedridden patients)

  12. 3. Culture and leasure time We evaluate especially: education, activity-focused and therapeutic activities. • Culture (number of culture and social events, books, films, newspapers and magazines) • Sport and movement (individual and group sports activities, trips) • Spiritual program (regular church service, contacts to clergymen) • Education (lectures, courses, PC training, memory training) • Volunteering (possibility to use volunteers) • Hobby activities (range of offer, even for immobile patients) • Transport and assistance out of home

  13. 4. Partnership We evaluate especially: mutual respect and recognition, adherence to rights and law and creation of conditions for free decision-making of users. • Communication (newsletter, noticeboards, meetings of users with the management, alternative communication) • Feedback (feedback twice per year, committee/panel of inhabitants, queationnaire of client satisfaction, mailboxes) • Individual approach (adaptation process, daily mode, selection of work activities) • Respect to personal space and ahderence to ethical rules (keeping intimity and secrecy)

  14. 5. Care We evaluate especially: quality and security of social, thepateutic and health care • Social care (co-efficient of care-giving staff, number of interventions, assistance when moving in the room and to the bathroom, basal stimulation) • Therapeutic care (offer of individual and group therapies) • Healthcare (rehabilitation care, ergotherapy, water-assisted therapy) • Anti- decubitus program (equipment, prevention system) • Provision of healthcare (choice of GP, prevention of falls, controlling system for care giving staff)

  15. Ponts and Stars - Overview • Accomodation max. 235 points • Boarding max. 185 points • Culture and leasure max. 118 points • Partnership max. 224 points • Care max. 238 points * 400 – 549 points * * 550 – 699 points * * * 700 – 829 points * * * * 830 – 900 points * * * * * 901 – 1 000 points

  16. Main Plaque

  17. WEB

  18. BRAND OF QUALITYDAY CARE CENTRES • WWW.ZNACKAKVALITY.INFO 18

More Related