Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Elemental Analysis - Atomic Spectroscopy

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 36

Elemental Analysis - Atomic Spectroscopy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Elemental Analysis - Atomic Spectroscopy. A) Introduction Based on the breakdown of a sample into atoms, followed by the measurement of the atom’s absorption or emission of light.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Elemental Analysis - Atomic Spectroscopy' - khoi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Elemental Analysis - Atomic Spectroscopy

A) Introduction

Based on the breakdown of a sample into atoms, followed by the measurement of the atom’s absorption or emission of light.

i. deals with absorbance fluorescence or emission (luminescence) of atoms or elemental ions rather then molecules

- atomization: process of converting sample to gaseous atoms or elementary ions

ii. Provides information on elemental composition of sample or compound

- UV/Vis, IR, Raman gives molecular functional group information, but no elemental information.

iii. Basic process the same as in UV/Vis, fluorescence etc. for molecules




iv. Differences for Molecular Spectroscopy

- no vibration levels  much sharper absorbance, fluorescence, emission bands

- position of bands are well-defined and characteristic of a given element - qualitative analysis is easy in atomic spectroscopy (not easy in molecular spectroscopy)






B) Energy Level Diagrams

energy level diagram for the outer electrons of an element describes atomic spectroscopy process.

i. every element has a unique set of atomic orbitals

ii. p, d, f split by spin-orbit coupling

iii. Spin (s) and orbital (l) motion create magnetic fields that perturb each other (couple)

- parallel  higher energy; antiparallel  lower energy

• Similar pattern between atoms but

different spacing

• Spectrum of ion different to atom

• Separations measured in

electronvolts (eV)

1eV =1.602x10-19 J

= 96.484 kJ ×mol-1

• As number of electrons increases,

number of levels increases

emission spectra more complex

Li 30 lines

Cs 645 lines

Cr 2277 lines



Note slight differences in energy due to magnetic fields caused by spin


C) Desire narrow lines for accurate identification

Broadened by

i. uncertainty principle

Uncertainty principal:

Dt .DE $ h


Dt .Dn$1

Dt – minimum time for measurement

Dn – minimal detectable frequency difference

Peak line-width is defined as width in wavelength at half the signal intensity


C) Desire narrow lines for accurate identification

Broadened by

ii. Doppler effect

Doppler effect

- emitted or absorbed wavelength changes as a result of atom movement relative to detector

- wavelength decrease if motion toward receiver

- wavelength increases if motion away from receiver

Usage in measurement of velocity of galaxies, age of universe and big bang theory


C) Desire narrow lines for accurate identification

Broadened by

iii. Pressure broadening

Pressure broadening:

Collisions with atoms/molecules transfers small quantities of vibrational energy (heat) - ill-defined ground state energy

Effect worse at high pressures:

• For high pressure Xe lamps (>10,000 torr) turns lines into continua!


D) Effect of Temperature on Atomic Spectra

- temperature changes number of atoms in ground and excited states

- need good temperature control

Boltzmann equation

N1 and No – are the number of atoms in excited and ground states

k – Boltzmann constant (1.28x10-23 J/K)

T – temperature

DE – energy difference between ground and excited states

P1 and Po – number of states having equal energy at each quantum level

Na atoms at 2500 K, only 0.02 % atoms in first excited state!

Less important in absorption measurements - 99.98 % atoms in ground state!


E) Sample Atomization – expose sample to flame or high-temperature

  • Need to break sample into atoms to observe atomic spectra
  • ii. Basic steps:
    • a) nebulization – solution sample, get into fine droplets by spraying thru thin nozzle or
    • passing over vibrating crystal.
    • b) desolvation - heat droplets to evaporate off solvent just leaving analyte and other
    • matrix compounds
    • c) volatilization – convert solid analyte/matrix particles into gas phase
    • d) dissociation – break-up molecules in gas phase into atoms.
    • e) ionization – cause the atoms to become charged
    • f) excitation – with light, heat, etc. for spectra measurement.

E) Sample Atomization – expose sample to flame or high-temperature

iii. Types of Nebulizers and Atomizers


F) Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)

–commonly used for elemental analysis

– expose sample to flame or high-temperature

– characteristics of flame impact use of atomic absorption spectroscopy

Flame AAS:

•simplest atomization of gas/solution/solid

• laminar flow burner - stable "sheet" of flame

•flame atomization best for reproducibility (precision) (<1%)

• relatively insensitive - incomplete volatilization, short time in flame


Different mixes and flow rates give different temperature profile in flame

    • - gives different degrees of excitation of compounds in path of light source

ii. Types of Flame/Flame Structure – selection of right region in flame important for optimal performance

a)primary combustion zone – blue inner cone (blue due to emission from C2, CH &

other radicals)

- not in thermal equilibrium and not used

b) interconal region

- region of highest temperature (rich in free atoms)

- often used in spectroscopy

- can be narrower in some flames (hydrocarbon) tall in others (acetylene)

c) outer cone

- cooler region

- rich in O2 (due to surrounding air)

- gives metal oxide formation

Temperature varies significantly across flame – need to focus on part of the flame

Primary region for spectroscopy

Not in thermal equilibrium and not used for spectroscopy

Flame profile: depends on type of fuel and oxidant and mixture ration


Most sensitive part of flame for AAS varies with analyte


- Sensitivity varies with element

- must maximize burner position

- makes multi-element detection difficult



1)Laminar Flow Burner

- adjust fuel/oxidant mixture for optimum excitation of desired


- usually 1:1 fuel/oxidant mix but some metals forming oxides use

increase fuel mix

- different mixes give different temperatures.

  • Laminar – nonturbulent streamline flow
  • sample, oxidant and fuel are mixed
  • only finest solution droplets reach burner
  • most of sample collects in waste
  • provides quite flame and a long path length

2)Electrothermal (L’vov or Graphite furnace)

- place sample drop on platform inside tube

- heat tube by applying current, resistance to current creates heat

- heat volatilizes sample, atomizers, etc. inside tube

- pass light through to measure absorbance



Place sample

droplet on platform


3)Comparison of atomizers

  • a) Electrothermal (L’vov or Graphite furnace) :
  • advantages:
  • - all sample used
  • - longer time of sample in light beam
            • lower limit of detection (LOD)
            • can use less sample (0.5 – 10)
  • disadvantage:
  • - slow (can be several minutes per element or sample)
  • - not as precise as flame (5-10% vs. 1%)
  • - low dynamic range (< 102, range of detectable signal intensity)
  • ˆ use only when there is a need for better limit of detection or have less sample than Laminar flow can use

b) Laminar Flow Burner


- good b (5-10 cm)

- good reproducibility


- not sample efficient (90-99% sample loss before flame)

- small amount of time that sample is in light path (~10-4 s)

- needs lots of sample


b)Light source

- need light source with a narrow bandwidth for light output

- AA lines are remarkably narrow (0.002 to 0.005 nm)

- separate light source and filter is used for each element

  • problem with using typical UV/Vis continuous light source
  • - have right l, but also lots of others (non-monochromatic light)
  • - hard to see decrease in signal when atoms absorb in a small bandwidth
  • - only small decrease in total signal area
  • - with large amount of elements  bad sensitivity

2) Solution is to use light source that has line emission in range of interest

- laser – but hard to match with element line of interest

- hollow cathode lamp (HCL) is common choice

Hollow Cathode Lamp

Coated with element to be analyzed

Process: use element to detect element

1. ionizes inert gas to high potential (300V)

Ar  Ar+ + e-

2. Ar+ go to “-” cathode & hit surfaces

3. As Ar+ ions hit cathode, some of deposited element is excited and

dislodged into gas phase (sputtering)

4. excited element relaxes to ground state and emits characteristic radiation

- advantage: sharp lines specific for element of interest

- disadvantage: can be expensive, need to use different lamp for each element tested.


c)Source Modulation (spectral interference due to flame)

- problem with working with flame in AA is that light from flame and light source both reach detector

- measure small signal from large background

- need to subtract out flames to get only light source signal (P/Po)

i. done by chopping signal:

ii. or modulating P from lamp:

Flame + P

Flame only


Flame + P

Flame only



d)Corrections For Spectral Interferences Due to Matrix

- molecular species may be present in flame

- problem if absorbance spectra overlap since molecular spectrum is much broader with a greater net absorbance

- need way of subtracting these factors out


Methods for Correction

1) Two-line method

- monitor absorbance at two l close together

>one line from sample one from light source

> second l from impurity in HCL cathode, Ne or Ar gas in HCL, etc

- second l must not be absorbed by analyte

> absorbed by molecular species, since spectrum much broader

- A & e are ~ constant if two l close

- comparing Al1, Al2 allows correction for absorbance for molecular species

Al1 (atom&molecule) – Al2 (molecule) = A (atom)

Problem: Difficult to get useful second l with desired characteristics


2) Continuous source method

  • - alternatively place light from HCL or a continuous source D2 lamp thru flame
  • - HCL  absorbance of atoms + molecules
  • - D2  absorbance of molecules
  • advantage:
    • -available in most instruments
    • easy to do
  • disadvantage:
    • difficult to perfectly match lamps (can give + or – errors)

3) Zeeman Effect

- placing gaseous atoms in magnetic field causes non-random orientation of atoms

- not apparent for molecules

- splitting of electronic energy levels occurs (~ 0.01 nm)

- sum of split absorbance lines  original line

- only absorb light with same orientation

- can use Zeeman effect to remove background

> place flame polarized light through

sample in magnetic field get

absorbance (atom+molecule) or

absorbance (molecule) depending

on how light is polarized












e)Chemical Interference - more common than spectral interference

1) Formation of Compounds of Low Volatility

- Anions + Cations  Salt

Ca2+ +SO42- CaSO4 (s)

- Decreases the amount of analyte atomized  decreases the absorbance signal

- Avoid by:

>increase temperature of flame (increase atom production)

>add “releasing agents” – other items that bind to interfering ions

eg. For Ca2+ detection add Sr2+

Sr2+ + SO42-  SrSO4 (s)

increases Ca atoms and Ca absorbance

> add “protecting agents” – bind to analyte but are volatile

eg. For Ca2+ detection add EDTA4-

Ca2+ + EDTA4-  CaEDTA2-  Ca atoms

2) Formation of Oxides/Hydroxides

M + O »MO

M + 2OH » M(OH)2

- M is analyte

- Avoid by:

> increase temperature of flame (increase atom production)

> use less oxidant

non-volatile & intense molecular absorbance



3) Ionization

M »M+ + e-

- M is analyte

- Avoid by:

>lower temperature

> add ionization suppressor – creates high concentration of e- suppresses M+ by shifting equilibrium.


G) Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (AES) – similar to AA with flame now being used for atomization and excitation of the sample for

light production

1)Atomic Processes


Degree of Excitation Depends on Boltzmann Distribution:

N1 and No – are the number of atoms in excited and ground states

k – Boltzmann constant (1.28x10-23 J/K)

T – temperature

DE – energy difference between ground and excited states

P1 and Po – number of states having equal energy at each quantum level

Increase Temperature  increase in N1/No (more excited atoms)

ˆ I (emission) % N1, so signal increases with increase in temperature


Need good temperature control to get reproducible signal

eg. For Na, temperature difference of 10o 2500  2510

results in a 4% change in N1/No

Temperature Dependence Comparison between AA and AES:

- AA is relatively temperature independent. Need heat only to get atoms, not atoms in excited state.

- AA looks at ~ 99.98% of atoms

- AES uses only small fraction (0.02%) of excited atoms

2)Comparison of AA and AES Applications

AES - emission from multiple species simultaneously

Comparison of Detection Limit

Some better by AA others better by AES


3) Instrumentation

- Similar to AA, but no need for external light source (HCL) or chopper > look at light from flame

> flame acts as sample cell & light source

Atomization Sources:

Electrothermal usually not used – too slow and not as precise


a) Flame Source:

- used mostly for alkali metals

>easily excited even at low temperatures

- Na, K

- need internal standard (Cs usually) to correct for variations flame


- cheap


- not high enough temperature to extend to many other elements


b) Plasma (inductively coupled plasma - ICP)

- plasma – electrically conducting gaseous mixture (cations & electrons)

- temperature much higher than flame

- possibility of doing multiple element analysis

>40-50 elements in 5 minutes


- uniform response

- multi-element analysis, rapid

- precision & accuracy (0.3 – 3%)

- few inter-element interferences

- can use with gas, liquid or solids sample


Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Emission Spectroscopy

- involves use of high temperature plasma for sample atomization/excitation

- higher fraction of atoms exist in the excited state, giving rise to an increase

in emission signal and allowing more types of atoms to be detected

Ions forced to flow in closed

path, Resistance to flow

causes heating

Temperature Regions

in Plasma Torch

Magnetic field

Ar charges

by Tesla coil

(high voltages at high frequency)


Overall Design for ICP Emission Spectrometer

Rowland circle:

- curvature corresponds to focal curve of

the concave grating.

-frequencies are separated by grating

and focused onto slits/photomultiplier

tubes positioned around the Rowland


-slits are configures to transmit lines for

a specific element


Arc & Spark Emission Spectroscopy

- involves use of electrical discharge to give high temperature environment

- higher fraction of atoms exist in the excited state, giving rise to an increase

in emission signal and allowing more types of atoms to be detected

- can be used for solids, liquids or gas phase samples

- types of discharge used:

DC arc: high sensitivity, poor precision

DC spark: intermediate sensitivity and precision

AC spark: low sensitivity, high precision

Because of difficulty in reproducing the arc/spark conditions, all elements of interest are measured simultaneously by use of appropriate detection scheme.

Arc created by electrodes separated by a few

mm, with an applied current of 1-30 A

Concave grating disperse frequencies,

photographic film records spectra


Comparison of ICP and Arc/Spark Emission Spectroscopy

- Arc/Spark first instrument used widely for analysis

- all capable of multielement detection with appropriate instrument design (e.g. 40-50 elements in 5 min for ICP

- ICP tends to have better precision and stability than spark or arc methods

- ICP have lower limits of detection than spark or arc methods

- ICP instruments are more expensive than spark or arc instruments


Example 11: For Na atoms and Mg+ ions, compare the ratios of the number of particles in the 3p excited state to the number in the ground state in a natural gas-air flame (2100K) and an ICP source (6000K)