1 / 17

Carrying out a Monitoring and Evaluation Diagnostic Study Geoffrey Shepherd April 28, 2011

Carrying out a Monitoring and Evaluation Diagnostic Study Geoffrey Shepherd April 28, 2011. Introduction: the role and organization of M&E. M&E provides information allowing us to judge the efficiency and effectiveness of public actions and their consistency with other public actions.

khoi
Download Presentation

Carrying out a Monitoring and Evaluation Diagnostic Study Geoffrey Shepherd April 28, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carrying out a Monitoring and Evaluation Diagnostic Study Geoffrey ShepherdApril 28, 2011

  2. Introduction: the role and organization of M&E • M&E provides information allowing us to judge the efficiency and effectiveness of public actions and their consistency with other public actions. • An M&E system is a set of linked activities to carry out the regular, systematic, and planned monitoring and evaluation of government activities. • M&E is a building block of a performance-oriented (or development-oriented) policy cycle.

  3. What is an M&E diagnosis? • An M&E diagnosis is an analysis of what is and is not working in a country’s (or a ministry’s, or a sub-national government’s) M&E activities, with recommendations for improving activities and systems. • The diagnosis primarily involves: • Institutional analysis: what are the rules and practices that drive demand for M&E? • Analysis of technical capacity: what are the data-collection practices, analytical instruments, and skills that supply the M&E?

  4. Constructing a checklist for a diagnosis • Different country situations (levels of development, institutional attributes, etc.) mean that there is no single blueprint for a “good” M&E system or for preparing a diagnostic study. • On the other hand, different studies of national M&E systems cover similar topics. • I have derived a checklist of topics from: • existing diagnostic guides; and • a review of recent M&E cases studies and diagnoses. • I shall illustrate some of the main practical issues under each topic with brief reference to country cases.

  5. A checklist: nine topics for preparing an M&E diagnosis

  6. Topic A.1. The national policy and institutional framework

  7. Topic B.1. M&E systems: historical development

  8. Topic B.2. M&E systems: objectives (announced, implicit, or revealed)

  9. Topic B.3. M&E systems: processes, tools, and products

  10. Topic B.4. M&E systems: relationship with other systems

  11. Topic B.5. M&E systems: institutional architecture

  12. Topic B.6. M&E systems: characteristics of organizations that are part of the system

  13. A recapitulation en route: where are incentivesin the checklist? The major policy frameworks that drive M&E - Incentives to provide good information. - Incentives to use findings • Organizational incentives (usually differing between agencies): • to perform, • to demand M&E, • to cooperate with other organizations

  14. Topic B.7. M&E systems: results

  15. Topic C.1. Conclusions and recommendations

  16. Organizing the diagnosis: some modest advice • An M&E diagnosis will not make sense in every country: there must be a policy framework that drives M&E. • Involve the government (c.f. Topic B.5 on institutional architecture – incentives to provide good information and to use the findings). • A diagnosis can be carried out at different levels – it can range from good journalism (with limited resources) to a research project (with greater resources). In any case, you cannot cover all topics in equal depth. • Prepare as much as you can before you go into the field – it’s amazing what you can find on the Internet. • Do not duck the challenge of making some judgment of results (Topic B.7) – with whatever caveats are necessary: • interviews and focus groups involving a diversity of actors will help. • The checklist is better at helping you identify the right information to collect than it is at indicating how to tell the story: • often, a historical narrative works best, but sometimes the need to compare systems may dictate a more instrumental approach.

  17. Thank you Geoffrey Shepherd geoffreyshepherd@msn.com

More Related