1 / 17

17.32 Environmental Politics

Environmental Justice. Is Environmental Policy Fair?. Does it Matter?. 17.32 Environmental Politics. Environmental Policy. Is government effectively addressing the most serious & risky environmental problems?. Are efficiency & effectiveness the only important

ketan
Download Presentation

17.32 Environmental Politics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environmental Justice Is Environmental Policy Fair? Does it Matter? 17.32 Environmental Politics

  2. Environmental Policy Is government effectively addressing the most serious & risky environmental problems? Are efficiency & effectiveness the only important considerations in environmental policy? CBA CBA →maximizing net benefits Economic Tools →most efficient distribution of environmental protection costs Do the distributional effects of environmental policies matter? Does “how” the government solves public problems matter? 17.32 Environmental Politics

  3. Environmental Justice Argument Bullard et al. 1980s environmental programs bypassed poor & minority communities Poor & Minority communities face greater environmental hazards than white communities Siting of environmentally undesirable facilities Low priority in clean up Is there a racial/class bias in LULU siting? Is there a racial/class bias in environmental protection efforts? E.g., Superfund 17.32 Environmental Politics

  4. Evan Rinquist (1997) "Equity & the Distribution of Environmental Risk," Social Science Quarterly, 78(4). Research Design Scope: all resident US zip codes (n=29,000) Dependent variable Likelihood of a TRI facility in the community Likelihood of more than one TRI facility in the community Concentration of TRI pollutants emitted in the community 17.32 Environmental Politics

  5. Evan Rinquist (1997) "Equity & the Distribution of Environmental Risk" Research Design (cont.) Independent Variables Race Economic Class Urbanization Manufacturing Employment Private Wells & Older Residences 17.32 Environmental Politics

  6. Evan Rinquist (1997) "Equity & the • Distribution of Environmental Risk" • „Conclusions • „TRI facilities are most likely to be found in urban • working class neighborhoods, even more so • if minority • „Minority urban working class neighborhoods • have higher concentrations of pollutants • „Race is least important independent variable 17.32 Environmental Politics

  7. Evan Rinquist (1997) "Equity & the Distribution of Environmental Risk" • „Critique • „Zip code as unit of analysis • „Racial resolution too coarse • „TRI facilities as indicator of local environmental burden • & environmental hazard • „Bias in burden measure toward large facilities • „Bias toward specific types of environmental hazards • „Which came first: the racial • composition of the neighborhood • or the TRI facility 17.32 Environmental Politics

  8. John Hird & Michael Reese (1998) "The Distribution of Environmental Quality," Social Science Quarterly, 79( 4). • „Research Design • „Scope: all US counties (n=3111) • „Dependent Variables: „smoke stacks „Hazardous chemical emissions (air) „HW incinerators „ permit violators (air) „(a)-(d) equivalents for water discharges „HW generators (Land) „HW production (land) „Treatment, storage, disposals (TSD) facilties „Landfill capacity „superfund sites „others 17.32 Environmental Politics

  9. John Hird & Michael Reese (1998) "The Distribution of Environmental Quality," Social Science Quarterly, 79( 4). • „Research Design • „ Independent Variables • „Poverty - - • „Race + + • „Population density (~ urban) + + • „Conclusions • „Race matters even after taking other things into account • „Critique • „County as unit of analysis • „Racial resolution too coarse 17.32 Environmental Politics

  10. J. Tom Boer, et al. (1997) "Is there Environmental Racism?" Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 4. • „Research Design • „Scope: all census tracts in LA County [n=1600] • „TSDF: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility • „Dependent variable • „Probability of TSDF in community (logit analysis) • „Independent variables • „Income • „Employment manufacturing • „% land in industrial use • „% minority 17.32 Environmental Politics

  11. J. Tom Boer, et al. (1997) "Is there Environmental Racism?" Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 4. • „Findings • „∩-shaped with income [explains previous studies‘ • findings viz poverty, unemployment, income] • „Employment manufacturing + + • „% land in industrial use ++ • „(or, population density surrogate) • „Conclusion: • „industrial areas with large concentrations of working class people of color are more likely to have TSDFs 17.32 Environmental Politics

  12. Conclusion • „There is an association between race and • the location of hazardous waste facilities • „Even after taking into account income and other • nuisance variables • „Why does this association exist? 17.32 Environmental Politics

  13. 3 Models of Environmental Injustice • „Intentional Bias Model • „Deliberate racial/social policy in LULU siting • „Institutional Bias Model • „Rules, procedures, policy-making processes • biased against poor and minorities • „Neighborhood Transition Model • „Poor & minorities arrive after environmental • hazard • „Cannot afford more desirable locations 17.32 Environmental Politics

  14. EPA Policy Statement – 199X • „"Fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and • incomes with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, programs, and policies." • „“Fair treatment means no racial, socioeconomic, or • ethnic group should bear a disproportionate share of the • negative environmental consequences resulting from • the operation of industrial, municipal, and commercial • enterprises and from the execution of federal, state, and • local programs and policies." 17.32 Environmental Politics

  15. Forms of “Equity” „Procedural Equity „Geographical Equity „Social Equity 17.32 Environmental Politics

  16. Brownfields • „Reusing old industrial sites with less than high • priority NPL contamination • „~500,000 sites • „Where are they likely to be? • „Environmental cleanup standards • „“undeveloped” standards? →greenfields development • „Who is harmed? • „geared to reuse, not pristine pre-industrial condition • „Who is harmed? 17.32 Environmental Politics

  17. Issues „Do market mechanisms in environmental policy create problems for environmental equity? „Does a brownfield strategy create problems for environmental equity? 17.32 Environmental Politics

More Related