1 / 18

W( → eν)+jets electron selection

W( → eν)+jets electron selection. Kira Grogg UW-Madison 17/06/09 June, 2009. Action Items. Make PFJet cuts of 30, 45 and 60 GeV in addition to 15 GeV In following slides; not pretty Make p T of W plots background subtracted use projected fit for background

Download Presentation

W( → eν)+jets electron selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. W(→eν)+jetselectron selection Kira Grogg UW-Madison 17/06/09 June, 2009 K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  2. Action Items • Make PFJet cuts of 30, 45 and 60 GeV in addition to 15 GeV • In following slides; not pretty • Make pT of W plots background subtracted use projected fit for background • Currently researching how to do this • Look at more variable cuts to reduce background • One possible cut: |d0| < 2 mm • For prompt electrons, use |d0| < 0.2 mm • Needs to be added to ntuple • Looking at conversion rejection algorithms as suggested by V+jets group K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  3. MET for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet (pT > 15 GeV) events Backgrounds are stacked Red line is stack of S+B MET, 1 reco jet MET, 2 reco jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V11 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 MET, 3 reco jets MET, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  4. MET for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet (pT > 30 GeV) events Backgrounds are stacked Red line is stack of S+B MET, 1 reco jet MET, 2 reco jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V11 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 MET, 3 reco jets MET, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  5. W mT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet (pT > 15 GeV) events Backgrounds are stacked Red line is stack of S+B W mT, 1 reco jet W mT, 2 reco jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V11 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 W mT, 3 reco jets W mT, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  6. W mT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet (pT > 30 GeV) events Backgrounds are stacked Red line is stack of S+B W mT, 1 reco jet W mT, 2 reco jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V11 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 W mT, 3 reco jets W mT, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  7. W pT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet (pT > 15 GeV) events Backgrounds are stacked Red line is stack of S+B W pT, 1 reco jet W pT, 2 reco jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V11 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 55 < mT < 105 W pT, 3 reco jets W pT, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  8. W pT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet (pT > 30 GeV) events Backgrounds are stacked Red line is stack of S+B W pT, 1 reco jet W pT, 2 reco jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V11 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 55 < mT < 105 W pT, 3 reco jets W pT, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  9. # events by # of jets for different jet pT After full selection….remaining W events From W/Z + jets ratio note Calo jet > 30 GeV Track jet > 15 GeV After full selection….remaining QCD events K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  10. Number of generated vs reconstructed jets # PF jets # PF jets Jet pT > 15 Jet pT > 30 Gen jets might need different pT cut than PF jet W events only # Gen jets # Gen jets # PF jets # PF jets # partons (Madgraph proc ID) # partons (Madgraph proc ID) K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  11. Conclusions/Next steps • PF jet pT cut of 15 GeV is reasonable • Top background still needs more investigation • Invariant mass of jets • In progress • HT? Shape? B-tagging? • W transverse mass fit to project signal W pT • Need to understand background estimation and subtraction methods • ABCD method • Template method • Meeting with Pedrame on Friday to discuss data-driven QCD methods K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  12. Backup K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  13. Number of generated vs reconstructed jets • QCD events only • Gen jets might need different pT cut than PF jet # PF jets Jet pT > 15 Jet pT > 30 # Gen jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  14. Electron pT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V9 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 Electron pT, 1 reco jet Electron pT, 2 reco jets Electron pT, 3 reco jets Electron pT, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  15. Electron η for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V9 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 Electron η, 1 reco jet Electron η, 2 reco jets Electron η, 3 reco jets Electron η, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  16. Leading Jet η for 1, 2, 3, 4 jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V9 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 55 < mT < 105 Leading jet η, 1 reco jet Leading jet η, 2 reco jets Leading jet η, 3 reco jets Leading jet η, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  17. W rapidity for 1, 2, 3, 4 jets Selection applied: Electron |η| < 2.4 Electron pT > 20 GeV V9 tuned ID cuts RelCombIso < 0.1 55 < mT < 105 W rapidity, 1 reco jet W rapidity, 2 reco jets W rapidity, 3 reco jets W rapidity, 4 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  18. Iso Efficiency by number of jets, Barrel vs Endcap S/√(S+B) S/√(S+B) Barrel Endcap # PF jets in event # PF jets in event Efficiency Efficiency RelCombIso RelCombIso # PF jets in event # PF jets in event K. Grogg, UW-Madison

More Related