Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Initial Assessment of EIA for Don Sahong Hydropower Project. Environment Programme Mekong River Commission Secretariat. Water quality and aquatic ecosystem health. Technical Consultation for Don Sahong Hydropower Project 07 March 2014, Vientiane. Impacts on environmental flows?
Mekong River Commission Secretariat
and aquatic ecosystem health
Technical Consultation for Don Sahong Hydropower Project
07 March 2014, Vientiane
Water quality during construction?
Water quality in the head pond/impoundment?
Water quality during flushing?
Water quality during decommission?
Impacts on sediment balance? (IKMP)
Impacts on nutrient balance?
Impacts on fish migration, both upstream and downstream passage? (FP)
Impacts on habitat continuity (fragmentation)?
Impacts on wildlife?
Impacts on tourism?
Impacts on health and livelihoods? (BDP)
This assessment is based on:
Environmental Impact Assessment Report, Final, January 2013 (EIA)
Engineering Status Report, Volume 1, 27 Sept. 2011 (ESR)Relevant environmental issues
Environmental flows (EF):Conventional use of term ‘EF’ is different from EIA/ESR. EF over Khone Falls is set at 800 m3/s – the lowest recorded in the extremely dry 2010 season. With DSHPP this will be the flow in 40% of the time. The measured/estimated minimum flow during 1982-2009 was 1,224 m3/s. It would have been appropriate with analysis of the visual impact (tourism) of flows of this magnitude. It would also have been relevant to see impacts of climate change on the flow over Khone Falls.
#1: Assess the impacts of and on the project from selecting a minimum flow over KhonePhapheng of 800-1,224 m3/s and assess the impact of climate change on the flow over KhonePhapheng.
#2: Assess impacts on water quality from loss of sediments during excavation and deposition.
Water quality in headpond/impoundment:WQ impacts during operation are not addressed. Given the short water residence time (max 4 h), it seems reasonable to expect no significant WQ impacts. Sedimentation of coarse material may occur in a 1 km zone upstream of the dam. The impact on WQ has not been addressed (but is expected to be minimal).
#3: It seems justified not to anticipate any water quality deterioration in the head pond.
#4: Investigate potential impacts from sediment flushing on the dolphin deep pool immediately downstream of the dam using 2-D or 3-D hydraulic models.
Water quality during decommission:EIA says there is no other reason to ever decommission the power station than to restore river conditions. To the extent blasting of concrete structures will take place, it may affect dolphins and other aquatic animals. The details of blasting (if and how) are not given in the EIA report. Potential consequences – although perhaps small – from short term blasts and increases in sediment concentrations have not been addressed.
#5: Assess short-term consequences of increased sediment concentrations if blasting of structures during decommission take place.
#6: It is unlikely that impacts on the nutrient balance (although not addressed by the EIA) will occur.
Impact on habitat continuity:This is not addressed in the EIA. Because the DSHPP is a project that spans only one channel and not the entire Mekong mainstream, the risk of destroying habitat continuity is less than for other mainstream dams. Except, maybe, for fish the dam does not create any insurmountable barrier for movement of species between habitats.
#9: Due to the physical characteristics of the project it is not expected that discontinuity of habitats will be an issue (other than fish migration)
Impact on wildlife:The EIA refers to suggestions of Si Phan Done (including DSHPP site) as Ramsar site but concludes that GoL appears unlikely to nominate it.The EIA has no information on wildlife species of regional importance, except the Irrawaddy dolphins, but seems not to have used the data suggested by MRCS in the 2007 review.The EIA mentions that in order to protect the dolphins living immediately downstream of the dam, underwater blasting will not be permitted as excavation method. The EIA report lacks documentation that flushing of sediment will not affect the dolphin pool.
Impact on tourism:The EIA dismisses potential impacts on tourism based on a superficial assessment. Visual impacts and impacts on tourism of flows over Khone Falls of 800 m3/s have not been assessed. Neither has the scenario where dolphins are no longer present. Information on tourist arrivals is generally outdated.
#11: Assess impacts on visual appearance and tourism of flow over KhonePhapheng of 800 m3/s. Up-to-date data on tourist arrivals should be used.
#13: Compare the DSHPP with the Thakho project alternative, using up-to-date information for the Thakho project.Alternative options