Common core state standards ccss
Download
1 / 42

Common Core State Standards CCSS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 238 Views
  • Uploaded on

Common Core State Standards CCSS. Presentation Objectives . TLW: understand the development process and design of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) become familiar with the ELA components of the CCSS become familiar with the Math components of the CCSS

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Common Core State Standards CCSS' - keran


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Common core state standards ccss

Common CoreState StandardsCCSS


Presentation objectives
Presentation Objectives

  • TLW:

    • understand the development process and design of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

    • become familiar with the ELA components of the CCSS

    • become familiar with the Math components of the CCSS

    • understand the CCSS assessment development and timeline for implementation

    • be able to locate CCSS website resources

    • discuss and develop an implementation plan for the CCSS at the building level


Ccss development
CCSS Development

  • The Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI), coordinated by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), committed to developing a common core of state K-12 English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics standards.

  • 48 states supported the concept

  • 40 states have officially adopted them

    • External and state feedback teams provided on-going feedback to writing teams throughout the process

    • Revisions made in response to feedback

    • Final standards released June 2, 2010

    • Michigan State Board of Education adopted in June 15, 2010


Ccss are
CCSS are:

  • Aligned with college and work expectations

  • Internationally benchmarked so that all students are prepared to succeed in our global economy and society

  • Build upon strengths and lessons of current state standards

  • Based on evidence and research

  • Robust and relevant to the real world

  • Focused and coherent

  • Fewer, clearer, and higher standards (???)


The common core state standards do not define
The Common Core State Standards do NOT define:

  • How teachers should teach

  • All that can or should be taught

  • The nature of advanced work beyond the core

  • The interventions needed for students well below grade level

  • The full range of support for English Language Learners and students with special needs

  • The assessment framework


Along with ccss
Along with CCSS,

  • • Educators must be given resources, tools, and time to

    adjust classroom practice.

  • • Instructional materials needed that align to the

    standards.

  • • Assessments must be developed to measure student

    progress.

  • • Federal, state, and district policies will need to be

    reexamined to ensure they support alignment of

    the common core state standards with student

    achievement.


Design and organization
Design and Organization

Cluster

  • Content standards define what students should understand and be able to do

  • Clusters are groups of related standards

  • Domains are larger groups that progress across grades

Domain

Standard


STANDARDS FOR

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

&

LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES,

SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS


Design and organization1
Design and Organization

Three main sections

  • K−5 (cross-disciplinary)

  • 6−12 English Language Arts

  • 6−12 Literacy in History/Social Studies,

    Science, and Technical Subjects

    Shared responsibility for students’ literacy development

    Three appendices

  • A: Research and evidence; glossary of key terms

  • B: Reading text exemplars; sample performance tasks

  • C: Annotated student writing samples


Design and organization2
Design and Organization

Four strands

Reading (including Reading Foundational Skills)

Writing

Speaking and Listening

Language

An integrated model of literacy

Media requirements blended throughout


Literacy in history social studies science and technical subjects 6 12
Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • Is the “next generation” of science standards

  • Includes 10 Reading Standards for grades 6 - 12

  • The old standards were written on 15 year old standards.

  • STEM – Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Uses an interdisciplinary approach

  • Includes core democratic documents in American history.


Writing standards for literacy in history social studies science and technical subjects 6 12
Writing Standards for Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • 10 rigorous standards for “writing across the curriculum”

  • Includes research and writing from “multiple print and digital sources”


Design and organization3
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

College and Career Readiness (CCR)

anchor standards

  • Broad expectations consistent across grades and content areas

  • Based on evidence

    about college and

    workforce training

    expectations

  • Range and content


Reading
Reading Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

Comprehension (standards 1−9)

  • Standards for reading literature and informational texts

  • Strong and growing across-the-curriculum emphasis on

    students’ ability to read and comprehend informational texts

  • Aligned with NAEP Reading framework

    Range of reading and level of text complexity(standard 10, Appendices A and B)

  • “Staircase” of growing text complexity across grades

  • High-quality literature and informational texts in a range

    of genres and subgenres


Design and organization4
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

K−12 standards

Grade-specific end-of-year expectations

Developmentally appropriate, cumulative progression of skills and understandings

One-to-one correspondence with CCR standards


Reading foundational skills
Reading Foundational Skills Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

Four categories (standards 1−4)

  • Print concepts (K−1)

  • Phonological awareness (K−1)

  • Phonics and word recognition (K−5)

  • Fluency (K−5)

  • Not an end in and of themselves

  • Differentiated instruction


Common core state standards ccss math

Common Core Science and Technical Subjects 6-12State StandardsCCSS - Math


Design and organization5
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

Eight Mathematical Practices

  • Carry across all grade levels

  • Describe habits of mind of a mathematically

    expert student


Ccss eight standards for mathematical practice
CCSS - Eight Standards for Mathematical Practice Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.

  • 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.

  • 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

  • 4. Model with mathematics.

  • 5. Use appropriate tools strategically.

  • 6. Attend to precision.

  • 7. Look for and make use of structure.

  • 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.


Design and organization6
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

State Standards for Mathematical Content

  • K-8 standards presented by grade level

    • Posters available

      • At http://store.kressdesign2.com/

    • Address label stickers

      • At http://www.mictm.org/


Design and organization7
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

State Standards for Mathematical Content

  • Organized into domains that progress over

    several grades


Fractions grades 3 6
Fractions, Grades 3–6 Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • 3. Develop an understanding of fractions as numbers.

  • 4. Extend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering.

  • 4. Build fractions from unit fractions by applying and extending previous understandings of operations on whole numbers.

  • 4. Understand decimal notation for fractions, and compare decimal fractions.

  • 5. Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions.

  • 5. Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions.

  • 6. Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to divide fractions by fractions.


Design and organization8
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

State Standards for Mathematical Content

  • Grade introductions give 2–4 focal points at each grade level


Focal points at each grade level
Focal points at each grade level Science and Technical Subjects 6-12


Design and organization9
Design and Organization Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

State Standards for Mathematical Content

  • High school standards presented by conceptual theme


High school
High School Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

Conceptual themes in high school

  • Number and Quantity

  • Algebra

  • Functions

  • Modeling

  • Geometry

  • Statistics and Probability


Ccss and glce comparisons
CCSS and GLCE Comparisons Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • Two Resources:

    • Michigan Department of Education

      • http://michigan.gov/documents/mde/CCS_Math_Alignment_Intro_4-23-10_sc_319725_7.pdf

    • Michigan Council of Mathematics

      • Documents are called “Crosswalks”

      • Long form and short form

        • http://www.mictm.org/


Common core state standards ccss assessment

Common Core Science and Technical Subjects 6-12State StandardsCCSS - Assessment


Race to the top assessment competition
Race to the Top Assessment Science and Technical Subjects 6-12 Competition

  • Assessment Consortia

    • Development of an infrastructure and content for a common assessment in measuring CCSS in English Language Arts and Mathematics

  • Two consortia

    • SMARTER/Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)

    • Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Career (PARCC)


Michigan smarter balanced assessment consortium sbac
Michigan - Smarter Balanced Science and Technical Subjects 6-12Assessment Consortium (SBAC)


Assessment update
Assessment Update Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • A new assessment system will be implemented in 2014-2015 and will be based on the work of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium

  • This will be a ‘system of formative and summative assessments, organized around Common Core standards, that

    • support high-quality learning and the demands of accountability

    • balance concerns for innovative assessment with the need for a fiscally sustainable system that is feasible to implement’


Assessment prototype
Assessment Prototype Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • 19 Multiple Choice questions

  • 3 Constructed Response questions

  • 18 Technologically Enhanced

  • 2 Performance Events

    • Possibly scored by local teachers first


Timeline for transitioning
Timeline for transitioning Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

2010-2011

Getting to know the CCSS/Alignment work

2010 MEAP/2011MME remain the same

State focus will be on technical assistance

2011-2012

Implementation of CCSS in classrooms

2011 MEAP/2012 MME remain the same

State focus will be on instruction/professional development

2012-2013

2012 MEAP minimally modified as necessary to reflect the CCSS

2013 MME remains the same

State focus will be on student learning

2013-2014

2013 MEAP based on 2012 model

2014 MME remains the same

State focus will be on preparing for new assessments from SMARTER Consortium

2014-2015

Full implementation: Instruction and assessment based on CCSS


Resources
Resources Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • Michigan Department of Education

    http://www.michigan.gov/mathematics

    http://www.michigan.gov/ela

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative

    http://www.corestandards.org

  • Michigan Council of Teachers of Mathematics

    http://mictm.org

    • Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability

      http://www.michigan.gov/oeaa

    • Summative Multi-state Assessment Resources for Teachers and Educational Researchers

      http://www.k12.wa.us/SMARTER

    • Michigan’s Mission Possible

      http://missionliteracy.com

    • Website for CCSS posters

      http://store.kressdesign2.com/


Two words
Two words… Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • Rigor

  • Relevance


  • Kent ISD – Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

    • Common Core Coaching Network

    • Curriculum Crafter

    • Summer Common Core work

  • Questions?


3 2 1 summarizer
3-2-1 Summarizer Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • Please write 3 things that you learned about the CCSS.

  • Please list 2 resources that you can go to for more information on CCSS.

  • Please list 1 way that you can begin to familiarize yourself with the new CCSS.


Presentation objectives1
Presentation Objectives Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

  • TLW:

    • have a basic understanding of the development and design and of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

    • become familiar with the ELA components of the CCSS

    • become familiar with the Math components of the CCSS

    • Understand the CCSS assessment plan

    • Discuss and develop an implementation plan for the CCSS at the building level


  • Please discuss the 3 questions on the CCSS Science and Technical Subjects 6-12

    worksheet page.

  • Please discuss and design a CCSS Implementation Action Plan for your building.

  • Building level teams will summarize their action plans to the group.


ad