Photo by Vickie Kelly,  1998
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 15

5.5 Numerical Integration PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 51 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Photo by Vickie Kelly, 1998. Greg Kelly, Hanford High School, Richland, Washington. 5.5 Numerical Integration. Mt. Shasta, California. Using integrals to find area works extremely well as long as we can find the antiderivative of the function.

Download Presentation

5.5 Numerical Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Photo by Vickie Kelly, 1998

Greg Kelly, Hanford High School, Richland, Washington

5.5 Numerical Integration

Mt. Shasta, California


Using integrals to find area works extremely well as long as we can find the antiderivative of the function.

Sometimes, the function is too complicated to find the antiderivative.

At other times, we don’t even have a function, but only measurements taken from real life.

What we need is an efficient method to estimate area when we can not find the antiderivative.


Actual area under curve:


Approximate area:

Left-hand rectangular approximation:

(too low)


Approximate area:

Right-hand rectangular approximation:

(too high)


Averaging the two:

(too high)

1.25% error


Averaging right and left rectangles gives us trapezoids:


(still too high)


Trapezoidal Rule:

( h = width of subinterval )

This gives us a better approximation than either left or right rectangles.


Approximate area:

Compare this with the Midpoint Rule:

0.625% error

(too low)

The midpoint rule gives a closer approximation than the trapezoidal rule, but in the opposite direction.


Trapezoidal Rule:

(too high)

1.25% error

Midpoint Rule:

0.625% error

(too low)

Ahhh!

Oooh!

Wow!

Notice that the trapezoidal rule gives us an answer that has twice as much error as the midpoint rule, but in the opposite direction.

If we use a weighted average:

This is the exact answer!


twice midpoint

trapezoidal

This weighted approximation gives us a closer approximation than the midpoint or trapezoidal rules.

Midpoint:

Trapezoidal:


Simpson’s Rule:

( h = width of subinterval, n must be even )

Example:


Simpson’s rule can also be interpreted as fitting parabolas to sections of the curve, which is why this example came out exactly.

Simpson’s rule will usually give a very good approximation with relatively few subintervals.

It is especially useful when we have no equation and the data points are determined experimentally.

p


Simpson’s Rule:

Trapezoidal Rule:

( h = width of subinterval, n must be even )

( h = width of subinterval )

Use the 2 rules above

to estimate the integral

to the right:

Your Turn!

Then determine the error of each method by comparing to

the exact integral value calculated by the antiderivative.


  • Login