1 / 34

Standards warm up… What is a standard? What is good about core arts standards?

Standards warm up… What is a standard? What is good about core arts standards? What is scary about core arts standards? Give us your thoughts – write them in the chat!. TOWN HALL MEETING NATIONAL CORE ARTS STANDARDS. http://nccas.wikispaces.com.

kent
Download Presentation

Standards warm up… What is a standard? What is good about core arts standards?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Standards warm up… • What is a standard? • What is good about core arts standards? • What is scary about core arts standards? • Give us your thoughts – write them in the chat!

  2. TOWN HALL MEETING NATIONAL CORE ARTS STANDARDS http://nccas.wikispaces.com

  3. Hosted by the National Coalition for Core Arts Standards leadership team member Americans for the Arts • Facilitator – Kristen Engebretsen • Presenters – David Dik, Lynn Tuttle

  4. Outline of the Town Hall • How are the National Core Arts Standards organized? • How can my voice be heard in the revision process? • What are the next steps?

  5. What is a standard? • What is good about core arts standards? • What is scary about core arts standards? • Give us your thoughts – write them in the chat!

  6. National Coalition for Core Arts Standards • American Alliance for Theatre and Education • Americans for the Arts • The College Board • Educational Theatre Association • National Art Education Association • National Association for Music Education • National Dance Education Organization • State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education • NCCAS Media Arts Committee • Young Audiences

  7. Why core arts standards? Why now? • Revision of other content standards • Additional research in arts education • Technology – in the arts and in instruction • Capture best practice from state revisions in last 2 decades • Meet challenges for today’s arts educators • Measurement of student learning in the arts • Robust curricular design + flexibility • Building a web-based set of standards

  8. Content area teams • Teams of 10-12 writers, 5 disciplines selected in December, 2011, from across the country

  9. Organizational Structure: Framework Matrix

  10. Organized by Arts Discipline

  11. Artistic Processes

  12. Processes Overview

  13. Process Components

  14. Anchor Standards

  15. EU’s and EQ’s

  16. Grade Level and Grade Bands

  17. High School

  18. Performance Standards

  19. Cornerstone Assessments

  20. Performing Presenting Producing Creating Students Responding Connecting

  21. How can my voice be heard in the revision process?

  22. July Review: by the numbers… • More than 250,000 certified dance, music, theatre and visual arts teachers work in our nation’s K-12 schools • 21,000 arts educators, arts advocates, teaching artists and others viewed the draft revisions to the nation’s voluntary arts standards in the first two weeks of July • More than 3,000 of those interested in standards revision provided feedback on the standards via on-line surveys in July, representing all 50 states and 3 nations • 61 selected writing team members combed through 1,056,000 responses and comments from the field on PreK-8 draft standards in early August.

  23. July Review: Common Questions… • How do we best balance the need for content within an artistic process framework?  • How much content is the right balance for a set of standards, without dictating curriculum?  • How can we simplify our language and still retain the essence of the artistic discipline we are describing?  • What is the difference between “domain specific language” and jargon when trying to describe an artistic discipline?  • Are there opportunities for increasing the commonality between the artistic disciplines while still distinguishing and honoring the differences between them?

  24. July Review: the Needs  • A glossary of terms for the standards.  • A refined reader-friendly format for the standards themselves, and a complimentary web-based architecture which is both searchable and intuitive.  • A “tagging” system that will identify performance standards in both Music and Visual Arts which meet the Conceptual Framework’s definition of Connecting, and therefore allow the web-based set of standards to reflect the underlying Connecting standards for each of these disciplines, along with those identified by Dance, Media Arts and Theatre. 

  25. High School Standards Review DRAFT documents of standards Each discipline = 1 document Online review process Each discipline = own survey Review timeline – now until October 21st! www.nccas.org – support Forum! All are accessible via the web at http://nccas.wikispaces.com/NCCAS+September+30th+Public+Review

  26. Reviewing draft document Dive in and read for your content area Does the structure, format and sequence make sense?  Do the standards progress from level to level appropriately? Is there alignment between the key elements of the standards? Are the standards measureable?   Can you see your teaching here? Can you find your students here?

  27. What are the next steps?

  28. What’s next? Writing teams are working on model cornerstone assessments Your feedback from the surveys will be shared with the Writing Teams in November and December Final Public Review of PreK-12 grade standards in early January! Finalized in March, 2014 On to State by state adoption/adaptation Support from Americans for the Arts and YOU!

  29. What will web-based standards look like? • Multiple entry points • Discipline specific view • Process Components/Anchor Standards/EU/EQ’s with corresponding standards across multiple grades • All Process Component Standards for a single grade

  30. What will web-based standards look like? • Philosophical Understandings and Lifelong Goals viewed across multiple disciplines • Model Cornerstone Assessments mapped across multiple standards by grade band • Functionality • PDF printout capability

  31. Navigation

  32. Navigation

  33. Performing Presenting Producing Creating Students Responding Connecting

  34. Additional questions from you… What did we forget to cover?

More Related