1 / 28

Improving Quality and Safety: Challenges and Roles for Research

Improving Quality and Safety: Challenges and Roles for Research. Irene Fraser, Ph.D. Director, Center for Delivery, Org. and Markets Presentation to Harvard Quality Colloquium August 24, 2005. The Goal: System Improvement. System Design for Quality & Value. Incent

kendra
Download Presentation

Improving Quality and Safety: Challenges and Roles for Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving Quality and Safety: Challenges and Roles for Research Irene Fraser, Ph.D. Director, Center for Delivery, Org. and Markets Presentation to Harvard Quality Colloquium August 24, 2005

  2. The Goal:System Improvement System Design for Quality & Value Incent Through aligned payment, public reporting, etc. Measure and Document Results • Quality • Patient Safety • Efficiency • Access • ROI (microsystems & macrosystems) Inform by evidence and models of successful design strategies Facilitate by improved HIT

  3. Measurement Challenges (1): Align Measures Horizontally, within efforts for • National tracking • NHQR and NHDR • Public reporting • Hospital Quality Alliance • Ambulatory Quality Alliance • National Quality Forum • Pay for performance • Quality improvement Vertically, so these efforts are nested

  4. Measurement Challenges (2):Measure All Dimensions Patient Centeredness Effectiveness Safety Timeliness Staying Healthy Getting Better Living with Illness/disability End of Life Care Source: Institute of Medicine. Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report. 2001.

  5. Systems Often Fail…

  6. Measurement Challenges (3):Data, Data, Data • Measures and data can improve with use – “good” measures and data can get better (though not perfect) • BUT – Even good measures with bad data can create mischief • There is no gold standard • Clinical, administrative, patient experience of care data all have strengths, weaknesses • EHR no data panacea

  7. AHRQ Efforts to Meet these Challenges • National tracking and benchmarks • National Healthcare Quality/ Disparities Reports • Measuring local experience of care • CAHPS for plans, hospitals, nursing homes etc. • Measuring culture of safety • Physician Measures – Ambulatory Quality Alliance • Measuring hospital quality and safety • Inpatient Quality Indicators, Patient Safety Indicators, Healthcare Cost and Util. Project • Measuring potentially avoidable admissions • Prevention Quality Indicators

  8. Prevention Quality Indicators Inpatient Quality Indicators Patient Safety Indicators Ambulatory care sensitive conditions Mortality following procedures Mortality for medical conditions Utilization of procedures Volume of procedures Post-operative complications Iatrogenic conditions Using Measures & Data as Platform for Change: AHRQ Quality Indicators

  9. Legend HCUP Partner Does Not Collect Inpatient Data States with Inpatient Datasets WA MT VT ME ND MN NH OR ID WI MA SD NY WY MI RI IA PA CT NV NE OH NJ IN UT IL CO DE WV CA VA KS MO DC KY MD NC TN OK AR AZ NM SC GA AL MS TX LA FL AK HI

  10. Quality Indicator UsesContinue to Expand • Tracking – National Healthcare Quality, Disparities Reports • Hospital report cards – Texas and New York State • Pay-for-Performance – CMS Premier Demo, Anthem of Virginia • Hospital profiling – Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois • Preventing unnecessary hospitalizations – targeting county-level interventions • Internal quality improvement – hospital associations in many states

  11. Five States Use AHRQ QIs for Public Hospital Reporting Wisconsin (parts of state) Oregon New York Colorado Texas

  12. On the Horizon: Evidence Review of Efficiency Measures • New Initiative: Identify, Categorize, and Evaluate Health Care Efficiency Measures • Conduct thorough literature review • Create typology for measures • Develop evaluation criteria for measures • Timeline: 1 year

  13. Big Variations in Cost AND Quality

  14. Quality Indicator AnalysesShow Cost Implications • Preventable hospitalizations cost $30B • Patient safety events cost $4.6 B • Zhan & Miller, JAMA, Oct. 8, 2003

  15. Evidence Challenges (1): Going beyond the Headline • We know financial incentives CAN work, but less about when and how. • We know public reporting CAN work, though not in the way we had expected.

  16. Evidence Challenges (2): We Don’t Always Know What We Think We Know • Widely-implemented clinical “best practices” sometimes turn out to be “worst practices” • Our knowledge of what works clinically is WAY ahead of our knowledge of what works in organization and payment. • Current system is dysfunctional, but there are many other ways to do it wrong.

  17. Evidence Challenge (3): Evidence Often Not Used

  18. AHRQ Initiatives to Bring Best Measuresand Evidence to Field • Measures and Data • NHQD/DR as a platform for improvement • CAHPS – SUN Contract • Quality Indicators – SQI Contract • Evidence and Tools • Model Reporting Template • Quality-Based Payment Decision Guide • Compendium: Aligned and Misaligned Incentives • Patient Safety Improvement Corps • Knowledge Transfer contracts • System Design Best Practices

  19. Reengineering Research: From Supply-Driven Model RESEARCHERS DECISION-MAKERS • Questions • Hypotheses • Grant Applications • Study • Writing • Re-writing PUBLICATIONS Leadership Politics Evidence Culture

  20. …to Demand-Driven Model DECISION-MAKERS RESEARCHERS Info + Tools Info + Tools PUBLICATIONS

  21. Integrated Delivery System Research NetworkIDSRN Has Brought Provider-Led Change Formula • Health plans, hospitals, doc offices, LTC facilities, researchers • Strong involvement of operational leadership • Under contract with AHRQ • Quick, action-oriented task orders Evaluation • 60% of projects brought substantial operational changes • Many other projects shaped national policy, data

  22. New ACTION Contract Will Build on This Success What’s new: • Title: “Accelerating Change and Transformation in Organizations and Networks” (ACTION) • Partners: Broader group of providers, possibly employers and coalitions, others • Scope: Taking change to scale, moving to wholesale For info, go to: http://www.ahrq.gov/fund/contraix.htm

  23. Building Evidence Basefor the Future: Challenges • Need “real-time” learning • Through partnerships, evaluation of “natural experiments,” etc. • But also need to keep an eye on future evidence needs: • Examples of work in progress • Rewarding Results • Medicare demonstration evaluations • MCRR summary of early P4P evaluations (expected February 2006) • Patient Safety Grants

  24. Strategic Issues for Research:How to Balance Investment Tools, Best Practices, Implement What We Know New Measures, Evidence Base for Future

  25. Need to Identify Lessons in Payment AND System Design across Payers

  26. Home Pagehttp://www.AHRQ.gov Irene Fraser: ifraser@ahrq.gov

More Related