E N D
1. Any Four Will Do 1 Interchangeability and CARS Bradford ParkinsonStanford University
2. Any Four Will Do 2 What’s Next?
3. Any Four Will Do 3 PNT to Explode with Opportunities
4. Any Four Will Do 4 International Augmentations
5. Any Four Will Do 5 New Signals are On the Way
6. Any Four Will Do 6 Summary - Spectrum of Modernized GPS Signals
7. Any Four Will Do 7 Coming: a Plethora of Signals
8. Any Four Will Do 8 Latest Signal Verified – L5
9. Any Four Will Do 9 Levels of Cooperation - New Systems:Can’t we just get along? Degrees of “Getting Along”
Compatible
Lets not hurt each other
Interoperable
I’ll try yours, you can try mine
Interchangeable
Any four will do
10. Any Four Will Do 10 GPS and Galileo/Compass/GLONASS-The Users Viewpoint Real Measure: Interchangeability “Mix and Match” with the same ranging accuracy
Enabled by L1C - defined, implemented, and operable – including all details
Seamless WAAS/EGNOS/+ ?
True clock Synchronization (Common Clock) and common grid
Payoff – Availability, Accuracy and Robustness for Worldwide Users
11. Any Four Will Do 11 Achieving Interchangeability Simplest: Common Clock and Geodetic System
Probably Implies a common Control System
Nationalistic Resistance
A New Proposal – Cross-Augmentation Reference System (CARS)
Each Satellite Broadcasts WAAS like Corrections to allow it to be seamlessly operated as a part of the “other” constellation
12. Any Four Will Do 12 Three levels of “WAAS-like Corrections” Correction for ephemeris and specific satellite clock
Implies frequent upload capability
Correction for satellite clock alone
Geodetic correction assumed constant
Intersystem time calibration (sub-nano-second)
Assumed very slowly changing
13. Any Four Will Do 13 GPS/Galileo CARS Example– Cross Augmentation Reference System GPS Monitor Stations track Galileo satellites (L1C)
Form WAAS-like Corrections for GPS satellites to operate as Galileo Ranging sources (Clock and Position – Include integrity?)
Include corrections as part of the GPS message
Result: GPS satellite is seamlessly useable as a part of the Galileo Constellation
14. Any Four Will Do 14 CARS : GPS/Galileo ExampleFirst Step: Monitor the “other” constellation signals
15. Any Four Will Do 15 CARS : GPS/Galileo ExampleSecond Step: Send Augmentation Corrections to Each “own” satellite to allow it to be “seen” (used) as a member of the other constellation
16. Any Four Will Do 16 And Galileo would do the same for GPS (etc. for other GNSS Systems) Advantages:
Satellites are truly Interchangeable
Avoids issue of which time or which Geodetic System
Very Low Rate message, low overhead
Very efficient – corrections broadcast only for the satellite being used
Each Satellite Provider has some control over use of their system
User can have highly accurate PNT in coordinates of their choosing
17. Any Four Will Do 17 Unintended Consequences? Each Constellation forced to be smaller?
Still need core capability to operate alone?
Military cannot use for “Fire” clearance – Sky impaired warrior not helped
Next Gen (FAA) still needs MOPS – May take a long time with Galileo
Misleading Information
Cross Augmentation Bit in message?
18. Any Four Will Do 18 Implementation of CARS Bi-Lateral Agreements
Could be done experimentally on a unilateral basis
Technical Working Group to adapt WAAS or EGNOS-like format for message
Which level and frequency of update?
Include Integrity?
Ionospheric correction probably not necessary
19. Any Four Will Do 19 Conclusion We are entering an era with incredible opportunities in Worldwide PNT
With a concerted effort of cooperation, all users should receive benefits: economic, safety and convenience
The ultimate goal is interchangeability
CARS would enable this
20. Any Four Will Do 20 Notes Time only: Phi, Phidot, and tzero
System to system time only
Saves a calibrating satellite
Unintended consequences
Need less satellites?
Military
Next Gen
Limited Upload Capability