1 / 23

Improving a Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring System Experiments & Equation Solver Improvements

Improving a Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring System Experiments & Equation Solver Improvements. July 27th, 2012 Jennifer Ferris-Glick & Hee Seung Lee. Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

kenaz
Download Presentation

Improving a Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring System Experiments & Equation Solver Improvements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving a Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring SystemExperiments & Equation Solver Improvements July 27th, 2012 Jennifer Ferris-Glick & Hee Seung Lee

  2. Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring Systems • How do we improve out dated textbook methods of learning and expand on intelligent tutoring systems?

  3. Objective of Study • To investigate the role of verbal explanation- When does it help learning? • To Explore the degree to which we can teach without verbal instruction - Is verbal direction necessary? - How can we help students discover/learn underlying problem structure and induce correct rules for problem solving without explicit verbal directions?

  4. Linearize task: solving algebra problems using data-flow diagrams: allows to study algebra learning anew in college population - 5 5 * 4 * + + 5 29 29

  5. Findings from Linearize study • Showing intermediate cognitive steps • Preventing superficial analogy from an example to problem • Building appropriate problem representations • Avoiding excessive floundering • Giving a chance to reflect on solved problems

  6. Showing Intermediate Cognitive Steps • Students still have to fill in gaps between steps when students study a worked example • Students learned better when intermediate cognitive steps were clearly revealed than when students had to determine hidden steps.  Force students to study step-by-step solutions

  7. Preventing Superficial Analogy • Given a highly similar example, students tend to draw a superficial analogy from the example to problem. • When superficial solution is available, students fail to abstract deep problem structure. • When examples look too dissimilar from a target problem, students sometimes simply ignore or do not spend enough time to study provided examples.  Examples should be dissimilar, and structurally similar to a target problem.

  8. Building Appropriate Problem Representations • Revealing hidden structure helped transfer- Making connections to Algebra activated prior knowledge and helped understand the problem structure • Highlighting relevant features (e.g., color coding)  Highlight features to direct student’s attention and reveal hidden problem structure

  9. Restricting Floundering & Supporting Reflection Activity • When students show too much floundering, they may not remember solution paths. In order to reduce floundering: • Immediate feedback on wrong attempt • Providing hints when students show floundering • Auto-solving with a time limit • Giving students an opportunity to make sense of already solved problems  Allow only a certain number of off-track activities. When a certain step was solved automatically, show corresponding verbal explanations for a while.

  10. Showing Intermediate Cognitive Steps Force step-by-step guided example before solving Maybe show previously solved equations Hint improvements Some changes but not full review Preventing superficial analogy Present side-by-side example Similarity of example Randomly selected from a pool of problems in each section (not too similar, not too dissimilar) Appropriate Problem Representation Aligning equations on the equals sign Coloring variable sides of equation Restrict Floundering Reduce off-path steps either allow 0 or 1 off-path step Reflection Time Provide side-by-side already worked out problems General Improvements to Carnegie Learning Cognitive Tutor (all conditions)

  11. One-step linear equations Solving with addition and subtraction (no type in) o w + 6 = -1 Solving with addition and subtraction (type in) o -4 = 1 + z Solving with multiplication and division (no type in) o 2x = -1 Solving with multiplication and division (type in) o 8w = 5 Target Material

  12. Two-step linear equations Solving One-step equations (Type in) o Mix of types from unit 5 Solving with multiplication (no type in) o -2 = 5x + 10 Solving with multiplication (type in) o -2 = 5x + 10 Solving with division (no type in) o x/6 + 7 = 8 Solving with division (type in) o x/6 + 7 = 8 Solving with a variable in the denominator (no type in) o 10 = -2/x Solving with a variable in the denominator (type in) o 2/z = -4 Target Material

  13. Linear equations with similar terms Solving two-step equations (type in) o Mix of types from unit 6 Combining like variable terms and a constant with integers (no type in) o 2 – 9x + 6x = 2 Combining like variable terms and a constant with integers (type in) o -6x + 2 + 5x = -6 Combining like variable terms with decimals (no type in) o 9 = 9.7x – 2x Combining like variable terms with decimals (type in) o -2.1z – 8z = 2 Combining like variable terms and a constant with decimals (no type in) o 8.1 + 7.4x + 3.7x = 4.6 Combining like variable terms and a constant with decimals (type in) o -6.6z – 2.8 – 6.7z = 2.8 Target Material

  14. Linear equations and the distributive property Solving Linear Equations (Type In) o 7 + 2x = -3 Using Multiplication and Integers (No Type In) o 4(z - 3) = 3 Using Multiplication and Integers (Type In) o -6(z – 6) = 10 Using Multiplication and Decimals (No Type In) o -4.5 = -2.6(z + 2.9) Using Multiplication and Decimals (Type In) o 8.3(z – 5.9) = 6.8 Using Multiplication and Large Decimals (No Type In) o -43.54 = -16.63(z + 24.90) Using Multiplication and Large Decimals (Type In) o -51.78(w + 97.21) = -11.63 Using Division (No Type In) Target Material

  15. Experimental Conditions Kanawha County School District 3 Conditions divided by class (4 classes for each condition): Discovery, Instruction, Standard Presented in line with curriculum.

  16. Experimental Conditions

  17. Example Types • Step-by-Step Guided Problem One per section – selected based on sections “new”material Students simply follow directions in a step-by-step manner to solve the problem • Side-by-Side Worked Examples Already solved problems appear next to a target problem

  18. Step-by-Step Guided ProblemInstruction To isolate w, subtract 6 from both sides. Select “subtract both sides” and enter 6. • Instruction condition • Provide “why” and “how” hints • Directly tell students what to do

  19. Step-by-Step Guided ProblemDiscovery Select an item from Transform menu and enter a number. • Discovery condition • Provide “how” hints • Provide instruction on general interface

  20. Color-Coding • Both conditions • Provide guided problem • Align equation on the equal sign • Coloring variable side of the equation • Highlighting changes between steps

  21. Wrong Attempts This is not the best way to solve the problem. Click “undo” and ask for hint if you need help. • Both conditions • Reduce off-path steps using “undo” button.

  22. Side by Side Worked ExampleInstruction & Discovery Example Problem • Both conditions • Provide already solved problems (screen-shot) • Selected from the pool of problems in the same section

  23. Post-Test 2 types of test questions: (paper-based, within subject) -Plain equations -Equations with solver interface scaffolding

More Related