1 / 7

Rule 407: The Repair Doctrine

Rule 407: The Repair Doctrine. Repair Doctrine. Change which would have made injury-causing event less likely Made after the injury Offered to prove Negligence Other culpable conduct Including defect or lack of warning Examples. Forbidden Inference of Culpability from Repair?. YES.

kelly-williams
Download Presentation

Rule 407: The Repair Doctrine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rule 407:The Repair Doctrine

  2. Repair Doctrine • Change which would have made injury-causing event less likely • Made after the injury • Offered to prove • Negligence • Other culpable conduct • Including defect or lack of warning • Examples

  3. Forbidden Inference of Culpability from Repair? YES Repair Doctrine 1 If someone repairs something after incident, it is SML that it was negligence not to repair it before the incident. D fixed hole afterwards D was negligent

  4. Forbidden Inference of Culpability from Repair? No. Inference of ownership OK. Repair Doctrine 2 If someone repairs something after incident, it is SML that he or she owned the property repaired D fixed hole afterwards D owned property

  5. Forbidden Inference of Culpability from Repair? No. Inference of feasibility OK. Repair Doctrine 3 If someone repairs something after incident, it is SML that it was possible to repair it before. D fixed hole afterwards D could have fixed hole

  6. Forbidden Inference of Culpability from Repair? No. Inference of existence of condition OK. Repair Doctrine 4 If someone repairs a condition after incident, it is SML the condition existed at the time of the incident. D fixed hole afterwards There was a hole

  7. Repair Doctrine 5 If changing a condition changes a result, it is SML that the condition caused the result. Connecting Fact No one has fallen since then Inference of Causation is OK Forbidden Inference? No Hole Caused the Fall D Fixed Hole Afterwards

More Related