The lumina center grantseeking workshop series presents outcomes evaluations april 20 2006
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 22

The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 82 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Valparaiso University. The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006. Today’s Agenda. Project components Defining outcomes Outcomes based planning Outcomes vs. outputs Identifying your audience Setting outcomes to drive planning

Download Presentation

The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The lumina center grantseeking workshop series presents outcomes evaluations april 20 2006

Valparaiso University

The Lumina Center

Grantseeking Workshop Series

Presents

Outcomes & Evaluations

April 20, 2006


Today s agenda

Today’s Agenda

  • Project components

  • Defining outcomes

  • Outcomes based planning

  • Outcomes vs. outputs

  • Identifying your audience

  • Setting outcomes to drive planning

  • Making outcomes measurable


Traditional project components

Traditional Project Components

  • Inputs

    (Money, staff, volunteers, facilities, equipment, supplies)

  • Activities

    (Strategies, techniques, types of treatment)

  • Outputs

    (direct products, classes taught, educational materials distributed)


Added project components

Added Project Components

  • Inputs

  • Activities

  • Outputs

  • Outcomes

    (including indicators and data sources)


Why measure outcomes

Why Measure Outcomes?

The “So What” factor

As funding becomes more scarce, service providers, governments, other funders, and the public are calling for clearer evidence that the resources they expend actually produce benefits for people.

Funders want greater accountability for the use of their resources.


Defining outcomes

Defining Outcomes

  • Outcomes are the BENEFITS realized as a result of the project.

  • They represent the IMPACT of the project on its participants.

  • They typically represent a CHANGE in the behavior, attitude, skills, status, knowledge, or life condition of the project participants.


Outcome based planning

Outcome Based Planning

Outcome based planning uses audience needs and hoped-for results as the foundation for programs and design decisions


Outcome based evaluation

Outcome Based Evaluation

Outcome based evaluation is a systematic way to assess the extent to which a program has achieved its intended results.

It focuses on the key questions

  • “How has my program made a difference?”

  • “How are the lives of the program participants better as a result of my program?”


Benefits of outcome based planning and evaluation

Benefits of Outcome Based Planning and Evaluation

  • Provides a logical framework for program development

  • Increases program effectiveness

  • Communicates program value

  • Generates information for decision-making


Limitations of outcome based planning and evaluation

Limitations of Outcome Based Planning and Evaluation

  • Not identical to formal research

  • Suggest cause and effect, it doesn’t intend to prove it

  • Shows contribution, not attribution


Outcomes checklist

Outcomes Checklist

  • Are the outcomes related to the “core business” of your program?

  • Is it within your control to influence the outcomes?

  • Are your outcomes realistic and attainable?

  • Are your outcomes achievable within the funding and reporting periods?


Outcomes checklist1

Outcomes Checklist

  • Are your outcomes written as change statements—will things increase, decrease, or stay the same?

  • Have you moved beyond client satisfaction in your outcomes?

  • Is there a logical sequence among your short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes?

  • Are there any big “leaps” in your outcomes (i.e. gaps in the progression of impacts)?


Develop a program

Activities and services leading towards intended outcomes

Have a definite beginning and end

Design it to change attitudes, behaviors, knowledge, or increase skills and abilities based on assumed need

Develop a Program


Audience

Audience

Programs are developed as a result of assumptions about people’s needs

Information can be drawn from:

  • Your experiences

  • A program partner’s experiences

  • Formal or informal research


Audience needs

Audience Needs

NEED: A condition, want, deficit that is common to a group of individuals

SOLUTION: A program that will change or improve behaviors, knowledge, skills, attitudes, life condition, or status

DESIRED RESULTS: The change or improvement you expect to achieve


Process

Process

NEEDS

SOLUTIONS

RESULTS

  • Getting to evaluation of outcomes:

    • What are the indicators?

    • What are the data sources?


Outcome evaluation

Outcome Evaluation


Results

Results

  • Based on audience success

  • That they know something or will be able to do something

  • They can be measured at various times (i.e. Initial, Intermediate, Long Term)

  • Targets can be established for each period


Reports

Reports

Reports summarize the results of outcome data and include:

  • Participant characteristics

  • Inputs, activities & services, outputs and outcomes

  • Elements requested by funders

  • Comparisons of previous periods

  • Interpretation of data


Evaluate the system

Evaluate the System

After a reasonable period of operation, evaluate the effectiveness of the outcomes system:

  • Have audiences been sufficiently identified?

  • Are outcomes clearly written?

  • Are outcomes sufficient to describe what you hope will happen?

  • Are data collection methods cost efficient?


Coming attractions

Coming Attractions

September 21, 2006: “Introduction to Grantseeking on Campus” (repeat)

October 19, 2006: “Federal Grantseeking”

November 16, 2006: “Collecting Data for Grantseeking”


The lumina center grantseeking workshop series presents outcomes evaluations april 20 2006

Questions and Comments


  • Login