Post keynesian macroeconomic methodology cambridge 26 january 2010 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Post-Keynesian Macroeconomic methodology Cambridge, 26. January 2010 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 157 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Post-Keynesian Macroeconomic methodology Cambridge, 26. January 2010. Jesper Jespersen Roskilde University E-mail: [email protected] Post-Keynesian methodology: a Critical Realist perspective Post-Keynesian macroeconomic theory: making ‘uncertainty’ epistemological relevant:

Download Presentation

Post-Keynesian Macroeconomic methodology Cambridge, 26. January 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Post keynesian macroeconomic methodology cambridge 26 january 2010 l.jpg

Post-Keynesian Macroeconomic methodologyCambridge, 26. January 2010

Jesper Jespersen

Roskilde University

E-mail: [email protected]


Slide2 l.jpg

  • Post-Keynesian methodology: a Critical Realist perspective

  • Post-Keynesian macroeconomic theory: making ‘uncertainty’ epistemological relevant:

    a. the Principle of Effective Demand

    b. liquidity preference theory


What is post keynesian macro economics l.jpg

What is Post-Keynesian (macro)economics?

  • A broad ranging approach on howtounderstand the dynamics of the real-world economy - considered as a whole:

  • Methodology – the (re)search for a relevant method to establish

  • Real-world related Theories and Models +

  • Empirical Tests of our Findings +

  • Reasonable judgements

    (with inspiration from Keynes and many others)


Inspiration from keynes s view on real world economics l.jpg

Inspiration from Keynes’s view on real-world economics:

[Real-world]…

…’[E]conomics is essentially a moral science and not a natural science... [I]t deals with introspection and values... and with

  • Motives (incentives),

  • expectations,

  • psychological uncertainties.’

     Microeconomic foundation


Slide5 l.jpg

Keynes’s Methodology:

  • Economics is a science of thinking in terms of models joined to the art of choosing models which are relevant to the contemporary world.

  • It is compelled to be this, because, unlike the typical natural science, the material to which it is applied is, in too many respects, not homogeneous through time (CWK, XIV: 296)

  • It seems to me … that you [Roy Harrod, jj] do not repel sufficiently firmly attempts ... to turn [economics] into a pseudo-Natural-science.....’


Slide6 l.jpg

Two fundamentally different methods in macroeconomics:

  • On the one side are those who believe that the existing economic system is, in the long run, a self-adjusting system, (CWK, XIII: 486)

  • On the other side of the gulf are those that reject the idea that the existing economic system is, in any significant sense, self-adjusting (Ibid.: 487)

  • The gulf between these two schools of thought is deeper, I believe, than most of those on either side of it are aware of.

  • On which side does the essential truth lie? That is the vital question for us to solve. (Ibid.: 488)

    Said by Keynes in 1934


Method has implication for theory l.jpg

Method has implication for theory!

  • The strength of the self-adjusting school depends on it having behind it almost the whole body of organised economic thinking of the last hundred years (CWK, XIII: 488)

  • There is, I am convinced, a fatal flaw in that part of orthodox reasoning which deals with the theory of what determines the level of effective demand and the volume of aggregate employment(Ibid.: 488)


Slide8 l.jpg

Methodology (continued):

  • I shall argue that the postulates of classical theory are only applicable to a special case only and not to the general case, the situation which it assumes being a limiting point of the possible positions of equilibrium.

  • Moreover, the characteristics of the special case assumed by the classical theory happen not to be those of the economic society in which we actually live, with the result that its teaching is misleading and disastrous if we attempt to apply it to the fact of experience. (Keynes, 1936: 3, my highlighting).


Hence post keynesian economics have to deal with methodology l.jpg

Hence, Post-Keynesian economics have to deal with methodology:

  • How to model the consequences of uncertainty?

  • Does macroeconomics need a specificmicroeconomic foundation?

  • How to avoid the fallacy of composition? (the outcome is different from the sum of the parts) – the economy as a whole

  • Trend and cycles cannot be separated in an open and path-dependent system

  • Context matters

     Methodology is a major dividing line when these questions are answered


Slide10 l.jpg

  • Post-Keynesian economics is when uncertainty and money are taken seriously

  • It penetrates economic decision making and behaviour at all levels – micro/macro and short or long run.

  • Hence, uncertainty and money are inescapable phenomena in macroeconomics

  • We know this from e.g.

  • Liquidity preference theory

  • The theory of effective demand


Slide11 l.jpg

The post-Keynesian economists have to be conscious about methodology!

Methodological requires thinking about:

  • Ontology - object

  • Epistemology - method

    3. Outcome - results


Three worlds of popper l.jpg

Three worlds of Popper

  • World 1 – Reality: ontology

  • World 2 – the analytical level, where method matters: epistemology

  • World 3 – the strategic level, where analytical results are used for politics: judgements


Slide13 l.jpg

WORLD 1

The real level:

(Reality)

Ontology

History

Tendencies

The analytical level:

Landscape

Theory/Model

Results

Mapping

WORLD 3

The operational level: recommendations

The cognitive veil

Tests

WORLD 2

Figure 2.1: Critical Realism methodology (Retroduction)


Slide14 l.jpg

Reality divided into three strata

Empirical stratum

Data – Imprecise measurements

Factual stratum

Events and tendencies

The deep stratum

Causal mechanisms, power structures and institutional relations

Figure 2.2: Stratified reality grounded in Critical Realism


Slide15 l.jpg

Frame of nature

Law

Sociology

Political science

Macroeconomics

Society as a whole

Figure 3.1: Macroeconomics is a sub-disciplin of social sciences


Slide16 l.jpg

Jesper’s methodological ’iceberg’

data

clock-work

reflexive organism

agents

actors

Market System

Power, structures, culture

Predicting the marketsystem

Understand reality

Inspiration: Martin Hollis

World 1

World 2

World 3:


Slide17 l.jpg

Figure 2.3: Two different methodologies

Post-Keynesian methodology –

Critical Realism/retroduction

Reality

(World 1)

Analysis

(World 2)

Policy-recommendations

(World 3)

General equilibrium methodology – Hypothetical deduction

Results =

policy-recommendations

(World 2)

Axioms

(World 2)

Analysis

(World 2)


Why critical realism i l.jpg

Why Critical Realism(I)?

  • There is an emerging consensus that the Post Keynesian approach is consistent with much of critical realism, with open-system theorizing applied to an economy understood as an organic, open system. Different forms of abstraction are relevant to different questions, and different economies; and indeed the study of actual economies required before abstraction can occur involves the application of different disciplines (Dow, 1996:79).


Why critical realism ii l.jpg

Why Critical Realism(II)?

  • Finally, since Post Keynesian theory starts with observation, the position on empirical matters must be discussed. First, rejecting the subjective/objective dual…. 'Facts' can be observed with some degree of objectivity… Since the group of theories includes formal models which are susceptible to empirical application, Post Keynesians do not reject econometrics (ibid.: 80)


Why critical realisme iii l.jpg

Why Critical Realisme (III)?

  • Understanding Reality

  • Unescapable uncertainty, the future is unknowable

  • Individuels are context dependent and interrelated because of uncertainty

  • Hidden structures and powers matter

  • Actual performance is path-dependent

  • Hence, open system analysis without a predetermined outcome is needed.


Open system ceteris paribus method l.jpg

Open System Ceteris Paribus-Method

  • The object of our analysis is, not to provide a machine, or method of blind manipulation, which will furnish an infallible answer, but to provide ourselves with an organised and orderly method of thinking out particular problems;

  • and, after we have reached a provisional conclusion by isolating the complicating factors one by one, we then go back on ourselves and allow, as well as we can, for the probable interactions of the factors among themselves. This is the nature of economic thinking (Keynes, 1936: 297).


Post keynesian economics is a social science l.jpg

Post-Keynesian economics is a social science :

As Keynes remarked:

…’[E]conomics is essentially a moral science and not a natural science... [I]t deals with introspection and values... and with

  • Motives (incentives),

  • expectations,

  • psychological uncertainties.’


Slide23 l.jpg

  • Keynes’s perception was that economies did not behave in the way economists said they did, that something vital had been left out of their accounts, and it was this missing element which explained their malfunctioning;

  • Keynes accused economists of his day of abstracting from the existence of uncertainty – human beings take decisions in ignorance of the future. (Skidelsky, 1992: 538-9)


Macro economic implications of taking uncertainty seriously l.jpg

Macroeconomic implications of taking uncertainty seriously

  • Here uncertainty makes a crucial difference, because any microeconomic decision or activity is characterized by lack of knowledge, but you have to act – so what do you do?

  • Look at Figure 1 – The structure of uncertainty


Slide25 l.jpg

(un) known

(un) likely

Expectations

Future

Uncertain

knowledge

(un) known

(un) likely

Actions

Consequence

Figure 1: The anatomy of uncertain individual knowledge


Slide26 l.jpg

  • Uncertainty makes macro-behaviour different from (n *individual micro), because:

  • Households and firms don’t behave independently

  • They follow conventions

  • Or they act intuitively on new information (animal spirit)

  • Or they learn from past experiences

    Hence, there is no such thing as an atomistic market (theory)


I will now concentrate on macroeconomic effective demand liquidity preference l.jpg

I will now concentrate on Macroeconomic: Effective Demand & Liquidity Preference

  • There is, I am convinced, a fatal flaw in that part of orthodox reasoning which deals with the theory of what determines the level of effective demand and the volume of aggregate employment


Where has macro demand gone l.jpg

Where has ‘macro-demand’ gone?

because ‘You will not find it [effective demand] mentioned even once in the whole works of Marshall, Edgeworth and Professor Pigou, from whose hands the classical theory has received its most mature embodiment’. (Keynes, 1936: 32).

This really is a puzzle, because neoclassical micro theory is, if anything, about supply and demand,

Until you realize, that at the macro level there was no room for macro-demand, when uncertainty is squeezed out of the analysis.


Figure 2 uncertainty explains the complexity of effective demand l.jpg

D-curve: Expected proceeds from aggregate (macro)demand

Z-curve: Expected Aggregate costs (incl. Profit): imperfect competition, mark-up:

Effective Demand

Macrobehaviour of businesssector

Aggregate credit facilities: the working of the banking system

Expected availability of supply factors: labour, capital, technology environmental conditions

Figure 2: Uncertainty explains the complexity of ’effective demand’


Slide30 l.jpg

Instead we are looking for:

An open, integrated market system ruled by aggregate - macroeconomic behaviour:

Liquidity preference:

There is, however, a necessary condition failing which the existence of a liquidity preference for money as a means of holding Wealth could not exist.

This necessary condition is the existence of uncertainty as to the future of the rate of interest (Keynes,1936: 168)


So what to do in practice l.jpg

So, what to do in practice?

  • We make a macroeconomic landscape

  • We have to make semi-closures, provisional stability (fixed expectations)

  • Using the Open System Ceteris Paribus method developed by Mark Setterfield


Slide32 l.jpg

Foreign sector:

Balance of payments:

Current account

Capital account

Exchange rates

Market for goods and services

(GDP)

Exports

Goods and services

Imports

Consumption

Gross profit

International capital flows

Intervention in currency market

Real investments

Loan

Labour market:

Employment

---------------------------------

Unemployment

Financial markets:

Money, bonds and shares

Public sector

Wage income

Income transfers

Tax

Excessive profits

Rate of interest

Unemployment benefits

Central Bank

Firms

Housing- market

Households

Mortgages

Financial savings

Figure 3.2: The macroeconomic landscape


  • Login