1 / 24

Beyond hardware financing: Pro-poor pathways to low carbon energy access Dr David Ockwell

Beyond hardware financing: Pro-poor pathways to low carbon energy access Dr David Ockwell June 2013 D.G.Ockwell@sussex.ac.uk. www.steps-centre.org/project/low_carbon_development. Overview. Pathways to low carbon development (Stirling 2012) Dominant framing: Hardware financing

kelii
Download Presentation

Beyond hardware financing: Pro-poor pathways to low carbon energy access Dr David Ockwell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beyond hardware financing: Pro-poor pathways to low carbon energy access • Dr David Ockwell • June 2013 • D.G.Ockwell@sussex.ac.uk

  2. www.steps-centre.org/project/low_carbon_development

  3. Overview • Pathways to low carbon development (Stirling 2012) • Dominant framing: Hardware financing • Alternative 1: Building innovation capacities • Alternative 2: Socio-technical nature of change & development • Implications for policy and research

  4. Multiple Pathways to “Low Carbon Development” - What? For who? How?

  5. Multiple Pathways to “Low Carbon Development” - What? For who? How? - Multiple configurations of energy services, access, behaviour, technologies….

  6. Intended and unintended processes and power ‘close down’ pathways Social expectations, cultural norms

  7. Intended and unintended processes and power ‘close down’ pathways Historical contingency: Path dependence

  8. Intended and unintended processes and power ‘close down’ pathways Politics: Interests, power – who frames the problem?

  9. Intended and unintended processes and power ‘close down’ pathways Economics: Lock-in to inferior technologies – even in competitive markets

  10. Dominant framing: Hardware financing

  11. CDM registered projects and accumulated investment value, as at end of February 2010 Source: Bryne et al. based on figures from UNEP Risø (2010)

  12. Number of registered CDM projects as of the end of February 2010, disaggregated by project type (2062 total registered projects) Source: Bryne et al. based on figures from UNEP Risø (2010) • Over 75% registered CDM projects use just five types of technology • Only one new renewable energy technology – wind – although mature relative to other new renewables

  13. Building innovation capacities Technology suppliers Technology transferred Technology importers New production capacity Supplier firms’ engineering, managerial and other technological capabilities Flow A Capital goods, services & designs Skills & know-how for operation & maintenance Flow B Knowledge & expertise behind technology Accumulation of innovation capacities Flow C

  14. Technology transfer National Innovation System New production capacity Capital goods, services & designs Skills & know-how for operation & maintenance Indigenous support for technological capabilities Accumulation of innovation capacity Knowledge & expertise behind technology Building innovation systems

  15. CDM registered projects and accumulated investment value, as at end of February 2010 Source: Bryne et al. based on figures from UNEP Risø (2010)

  16. Socio-technical nature of change & development

  17. Socio-technical nature of change & development

  18. Socio-technical nature of change & development

  19. Socio-technical nature of change & development

  20. Different framings: Different distribution of benefits • Funding for one-off, international hardware investments Funding distribution of externally manufactured, culturally inappropriate technologies

  21. Different framings: Different distribution of benefits • Building innovation capacity & systems, e.g. • - Nurturing niches of low C energy • - Brokering knowledge flows • - Sourcing local labour & parts • - Cementing networks Participatory technology development & implementation e.g. - Capabilities to build & maintain cook stoves - Locally available materials - Fit with social practices - Facilitate knowledge transfer within & beyond communities

  22. Different framings: Different policy, practice & research

  23. Conclusion: Pro-poor pathways to low carbon development? www.steps-centre.org/project/low_carbon_development

More Related