PCBs in San Francisco Bay Area Municipal Wastewater Effluents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pcbs in san francisco bay area municipal wastewater effluents
Download
1 / 15

  • 105 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

PCBs in San Francisco Bay Area Municipal Wastewater Effluents. Donald Yee*, Jon Leatherbarrow, Jay Davis. Study Participants. Fairfield Suisun*, Palo Alto, San Jose, Sunnyvale - (SB/FS) (~200 MGD)November 1999 – July 2000 CCCSD, CCSF, EBDA, EBMUD, Millbrae* - (CB)

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

PCBs in San Francisco Bay Area Municipal Wastewater Effluents

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Pcbs in san francisco bay area municipal wastewater effluents

PCBs in San Francisco Bay Area Municipal Wastewater Effluents

Donald Yee*, Jon Leatherbarrow, Jay Davis


Study participants

Study Participants

  • Fairfield Suisun*, Palo Alto, San Jose, Sunnyvale - (SB/FS)

    (~200 MGD)November 1999 – July 2000

  • CCCSD, CCSF, EBDA, EBMUD, Millbrae* - (CB)

    (~300 MGD)December 2000 – February 2001

    Total SF Bay Area Municipal Effluents ~600 MGD

    * did not sample for all events


Why measure pcbs in effluent

Why measure PCBs in effluent?

  • Evaluate potential for impacts

    • Water quality (fish tissue) criterion (170 pg/L total PCBs)

    • Ambient water concentrations

  • Estimate loads to SF Estuary

    • Effluent potentially controllable pathway

    • Evaluate in context of other loads

  • Limited number of previous measurements

    • Restricted use since 1979, expect decline


Sb fs sampling cb sampling

PCBs only

2 sampling events

1 Lab

FB system

4 L filled bottle (amber narrow neck solvent bottle)

Second bottle taken as backup/ blind duplicate

PAHs, PCBs, pesticides, dioxins

4 sampling events

Intercomparison of

2 labs collecting (first event)

3 labs analyzing (all 4 events)

Infiltrex (SPE) system

400 L solid phase extraction

Glass fiber filter in series w/

250 g or 2x70 g XAD2 columns

SB/FS Sampling CB Sampling


Spe sampling sb fs fb sampling cb

Advantages/disadvantages

+ Ease of collection (=4kg)

± Quick grab sample

– Higher detection limits

Advantages/disadvantages

+ Ease of sample handling

(400 L = 400 kg = hernia)

+ Lower detection limits

± Slow composite sample

– Potential incomplete recovery

SPE Sampling (SB/FS)FB Sampling (CB)


Pcbs in effluent first event sb fs

PCBs in Effluent (First Event)(SB/FS)

Sampling differences

  • Lab A – one 250 g column

  • Lab B – two 70 g columns (140 g total XAD2)

  • Lab A recovery average 25% higher than Lab B

    Analytical differences

  • Lab C no prior experience in SPE water matrix


Sampling issues remedies sb fs

Sampling Issues & Remedies(SB/FS)

Issue: Collection differences?

  • Different column sizes: larger column = greater retention

    Remedies

  • Columns to collect breakthrough (in series)

    • Recovery improved but still incomplete (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8…)

  • Whole effluent/water analysis

    • To be used for select 2002 RMP water samples

    • Limited number of analytes (e.g. PCBs only)


Pcbs in effluent all events sb fs

PCBs in Effluent (All Events)(SB/FS)

Lab B collected samples

  • Sum of PCBs 120-320 pg/L

    (RMP average 600 pg/L)

  • Event differences generally insignificant and < 2x

  • Plant differences generally insignificant

  • Annual loads < 0.1 kg/yr

    • (mean flow x concentration]


Analytical variability sb fs

Analytical Variability(SB/FS)

  • Intra-lab replicate analyses of XAD2 extracts or blank spikes RSD < 20%

  • Inter-lab splits of XAD2 extracts RSD 20-80% (max:min = 1.5-9x)

  • Average RSD = 51% with Lab C, 33% without Lab C


Analytical issues and remedies sb fs

Analytical Issues and Remedies(SB/FS)

Issues

  • Inter-lab variability >> intra-lab

    • Surrogate recovery handling (ECD vs MS)

    • Interferences, peak shifts

      Remedies

  • Intercalibration exercises

    • NIST (sediment, tissue) acceptable Z-scores ± 50%

    • ERA WP-83 (water) limits 30-150% (Aroclor 1242 @ 11 µg/L)


Pcbs in effluent cb

PCBs in Effluent(CB)

  • SFEI/POTW staff collected 4 L grabs

  • No sample splits

  • Replicate sample


Sampling analytical variability cb

Sampling & Analytical Variability (CB)

  • Samples from each event

    • ~2 month separation

    • Event flow differences up to ~2x

    • Sum PCBs RSD ~ 25% or less at a site

  • Blind replicate sample

    • ~10 minutes separation

    • Sum PCBs RSD < 5%


Summary

Summary

  • Measurable PCBs in effluents

    • Sum PCBs 100-7900 pg/L

  • Municipal wastewater loads ~2 kg/yr

    • Small inter-season/event differences

  • Inter-lab >> intra-lab variability

    • Familiarity with particular matrix important

    • Need reliable lab and/or additional QA/QC


What next

What Next?

Filling in PCB budget

  • PCBs in refinery effluent (underway)

    • Preliminary results - also small component of loads

  • Local tributary loads

    • (including stormwater)

  • Delta loads

    • Even more sensitive to accuracy/precision issues


Pcbs in san francisco bay area municipal wastewater effluents

Next

  • Refined RMP sampling

    • Representative site selection

    • Improved measurement accuracy

  • Organics QA/QC workshop

    • Further the state of the art

    • @SFEI March 29, 2002 10am-3pm


  • Login