slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
School Story

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

School Story - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 105 Views
  • Uploaded on

School Story . Coyote Ridge is proudly in our 3 rd year of existence! Our K-5 th school population is comprised of 350 students (up from 297 last year) Diversity: Hispanic – 9% Asian – 4% Black – 2% White – 80% Other – 4% Male/Female: 50/50% Free and Reduced Meals (FARM): 13%

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' School Story ' - keilah


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
school story
School Story
  • Coyote Ridge is proudly in our 3rd year of existence!
    • Our K-5th school population is comprised of 350 students (up from 297 last year) Diversity:
        • Hispanic – 9%
        • Asian – 4%
        • Black – 2%
        • White – 80%
        • Other – 4%
      • Male/Female: 50/50%
      • Free and Reduced Meals (FARM): 13%
      • Students with IEP’s and/or ILP’s: 9% have an IEP, 16% have an ILP
      • Students with ALP’s: 5%
  • CRES aspires to become an Authorized IB PYP School. We will complete the second phase of that process, “Application A” this year!
  • We are thrilled to be “Accredited with Distinction” by CDE
data science
Data--Science
  • 2008-2009
    • 5th 71%
  • 2009-2010
    • 5th 94%
data math
Data--Math

2009-2010 Math

3rd- 100%

4th- 100%

5th- 100%

Median Growth- 92%

2008-2009 Math

3rd- 83%

4th- 100%

5th- 88%

data reading
Data--Reading

2009-2010 Reading

3rd Grade-

4th Grade-

5th Grade-

Median Growth- 86%

2008-2009 Reading

3rd- 88%

4th- 92%

5th- 96%

data writing
Data--Writing

2009-2010 Writing

3rd- 80%

4th- 78%

5th- 94%

Median Growth- 95%

2008-2009 Writing

3rd- 61%

4th- 75%

5th- 79%

celebrations challenges
Celebrations & Challenges

Celebrations:

Continued growth year to year on CSAP and other measures

Growth of ALL students!

Successful implementation of RtI practices

PST Team for both academic and behavior challenges

Interventions for all kids who need them

Challenges:

53 new students to our school + 70 kindergartners

Sixty six 2nd graders registered in 2 classes

No additional FTE from district provided

Reconfigured our staffing plan to solve the problem

Resulted in loss of 2 aides to help in large classrooms, etc.

Loss of literacy interventionists, no FTE for math interventions

1.5 FTE last year to .75 this year – 123 new students in our school

Space for interventions is minimal/school is packed

rationale how why targets were selected
Rationale: How/Why targets were selected
  • We chose our targets based on:
    • Previous success on CSAP and other assessments
      • Growth of all students/desire to replicate student success
    • Desire to continue IB work, which we directly relate to our success
      • Alignment of school-wide curriculum
        • Targeting writing instruction
      • Articulation between all grade levels
        • Common literacy vocabulary taught in all grade levels
      • Implementation of best teaching practices
      • New state standards used to drive our Units of Inquiry
      • Deepen our use of performance assessments to monitor progress
      • Development of common assessments especially in K-2
results of root cause analysis
Results of Root Cause Analysis
  • We believe our students’ overall academic achievement can be partially attributed to the implementation of our staff’s collaborative work to become an authorized IB school including: Professional development plan which included weekly vertical articulation to create our Programme of Inquiry (POI), horizontal articulation to develop grade level unit planners, use of Backwards Design to create Units of Inquiry, implementing and teaching technology skills, teaching research skills, teaching through inquiry to maximize critical thinking, providing opportunities and teaching students to be reflective, integrating action-based community service, knowing and aligning the teaching of the new Colorado 21st Century Learning Standards.
  • We believe that the gap was closed by the following practices we employed (and we will continue to use): Careful analysis of data to identify gaps, grade level articulation (horizontal and vertical), grade level team planning with interventionists, & instructional coach, flooding model in reading to increase literacy blocks from 90 minutes to 120 minutes, and for targeting student needs in small groups, Inquiry based approach to teaching, use of common assessments and rubrics among grade levels, allocated financial resources to purchase intervention programs and fund intervention positions, actively engaged volunteers to help meet student’s literacy goals.
highlights of action plan
Highlights of Action Plan
  • We will be able to define and articulate what students will be able to do, know, and understand in each of our grade level units of inquiry.
  • We will articulate and define what students need to be able to do at each grade level in writing. We then we will be able to create a school wide writing rubric.
  • We will deepen our understanding of the inquiry process and how it applies to our IB planners. We will have opportunities to observe inquiry in action, and will begin to take risks in showing off our newly acquired skills.
  • We will use what we know about inquiry and apply that understanding in creating performance assessments.
review of plan
Review of Plan:
  • August 2nd & 3rd: District Training w/ Leadership Team
  • Data shared with staff, individual review of data
  • August 11th & 12th: Full Staff work on SIP
    • Review of Data
    • Opportunities to reflect/discuss in small and large groups
    • Root Cause Analysis done by full staff – lead by Leadership Team
  • Sept. 1st: District Day, Standards work/Literacy goals through IB Units
  • Sept. 9th: Literacy Committee Work began to a set direction for our writing goal work
  • Sept. 12th: Leadership Team Retreat Sunday to complete the SIP Template
  • Sept. 22nd: SIP presented to the staff and incorporated feedback
  • Sept. 27th: SAAC presentation incorporated feedback, set topics for SAAC discussions
  • Sept. 29th: Plan finalized after last staff review and submitted to district
ad