1 / 20

Disaster Reconstruction in Japan: Lessons Learned from the Kobe Earthquake

SAR Regional Conference on Hazard Risk Management 19-20 December 2006, New Delhi, India. Disaster Reconstruction in Japan: Lessons Learned from the Kobe Earthquake. Asian Disaster Reduction Center Senior Researcher

keene
Download Presentation

Disaster Reconstruction in Japan: Lessons Learned from the Kobe Earthquake

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SAR Regional Conference on Hazard Risk Management 19-20 December 2006, New Delhi, India Disaster Reconstruction in Japan: Lessons Learned from the Kobe Earthquake Asian Disaster Reduction Center Senior Researcher Etsuko Tsunozaki

  2. Damage by the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Occurred at 05:46 on 17 January, 1995 Scale： Magnitude 7.3 Seismic intensity：7 on Japanese scale Epicenter：South Hyogo (North Awaji Isl.) Dead：6,433 people Financial damage：$ 87 billion (2.5% of GDP) Evacuees： 316,678 people at peak Evacuation centers： 1,153 locations Completely/ Half destroyed：249,180 bld’gs Seismic intensity 7

  3. The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Reconstruction Plan Hyogo Phoenix Plan • Started 4 days after the disaster • Adopted in July 1995 • Targeted completion: 2005 • Targeted areas: • 10 cities and 10 towns

  4. Hyogo Phoenix Plan Creative Reconstruction ---Better than pre-quake-- ●Harmonious Coexistence between People & Nature/Society • Five pillars • Creation of a WELFARE society tailored for the 21st century • Creation of a CULTURALLY rich society open to the world • Creation of a society where existing INDUSTRIES grow and new INDUSTRIES flourish • Creation of a DISASTER-RESISTANT metropolis where people can live with confidence • URBAN DEVELOPMENT with multi-centered network-type metropolitan area

  5. Lesson 1Delay of First Response • Damaged Headquarters • Local Government Command System was initially paralyzed • Destroyed almost all traffic system • Telecommunication, even satellite telecommunication systems were cut off It took three days to grasp the entire damage

  6. Countermeasure 1 • Establishment of the Cabinet Information Collection Center • Enhanced Governmental System - Minister of State for Disaster Management - Chief Cabinet Secretary for Crisis Management • Development of Disaster Information System (DIS) - Early Estimation System - Emergency Measure Support System

  7. Lesson 2Absence of Coordination among Relevant Organizations • Damage was too large for local governments to cope with • Local governments could not request the National government or other agencies to help because their headquarters themselves were paralyzed • Medical cooperation was not effective enough

  8. Countermeasure 2 Nation Wide Support System for Disaster Emergency Response - National Police Agency, Fire and Disaster Management Agency, Coast Guard and Self Defense Forces - Inter-Prefectural Support Agreement - Medical Transportation Action Plan - Designation of Emergency Hospitals - Designation of Heliports

  9. Lesson 3Lack of Preparedness • 80 % were killed by collapsed buildings • Most damaged buildings did not comply with the building code “Building Standard Law” revised in 1981 (most of them were old buildings built before this revision) • Fire broke out and spread at old wooden houses densely built up area

  10. Countermeasure 3 Seismic Building Retrofitting Act (1995) To promote seismic retrofitting of existing vulnerable buildings - Subsidy - - Seismic diagnosis of buildings 2/3 of the cost, shared by national and local governments - Seismic retrofitting of large buildings 13% of the cost, shared by both - Seismic retrofitting of houses in dense residential areas (from 2002) 15% of the cost, shared by both

  11. <Data from building survey in Central Kobe: 923bldgs> 100% <Index> 25% 80% Collapse/ Ser. Dmg 57% 60% 75% Moderate/ Minor 40% 40% Slight/No Damage 31% 20% 35% (17) 16% 12% (5) 8% (3) (Collapse) 0% -1971 1982- 1972-81 Building Damage by Construction Date In Japan, 21 mil. houses were built before 1981 (out of 44 mil) 14 mil. Houses are not seismic resistant: needs reinforcement

  12. Lesson 4Importance of Community and Volunteer • Most people were rescued by local community • 1.4 million volunteers rush to damaged area to support victims • Volunteers were really helpful and useful especially in the fields of medical, architecture, welfare, logistics specialist etc. • Disaster vulnerable people, elderly, children,..

  13. Countermeasure 4 • Support system for Volunteer Activity • Designating January 17 as “Disaster Management and Volunteer Day” • The Law to Promote Specific Nonprofit Activities • Promotion of Community Self Defense Organizations Participating rate in VDR groups (%) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Time

  14. Lesson 5Need for Assistance in Livelihood Restoration • 44% of death casualty: over 65 years old • More women than men killed: 2,713 men vs. 3,680 women* • Destruction of communities: resulted in more than 200 lonely deaths without terminal care by their families *Source: Hyogo Prefecture

  15. Countermeasure 5 • Revision of Compensation Framework • Revision of Local Tax Law • Fund of 900 billion yen (9 billion US$) was established in April 1995 • New Support Framework - Livelihood Restoration Fund Loans - Increased Rent Subsidies - Assistance for voluntary activities, events to revitalize shopping arcades, community building, etc.

  16. Lesson 6Importance of Urban Planning

  17. Countermeasure 6 • Live in Harmony with Nature: understand the nature (dangerous slopes, active faults, etc.) • Water and Greenery: part of infrastructure • Decentralization of Urban Functions • Balanced Transportation System: alternate routes • Urban Infrastructure (ensure public space: roads, parks, public squares, etc.) • Fire & Earthquake Resistant Buildings • Life lines: fail-safe approach

  18. Lesson 7Transfer of Lessons • Importance of Sharing Information, Knowledge, Lessons and Experience on the Earthquake • Importance of Education in Disaster Reduction • Importance of Research in Disaster Reduction • Importance of Citizen Centered and Active Community

  19. Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Memorial, Disaster Reduction and Human Renovation Institution (DRI) • Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC) • UN/OCHA • UNCRD (UN Centre for Regional Development) • EDM (Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Center, NIED) • WHO Kobe Center • JICA Hyogo International Center • Disaster Medical Center • IRP (International Recovery Platform) Countermeasure 7

  20. http://www.adrc.or.jp Thank You for Your Attention!

More Related