1 / 17

Dynamical response networks under perturbations

Dynamical response networks under perturbations. Seung-Woo Son, Dong-Hee Kim, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Hawoong Jeong Complex System and Statistical Physics Lab., Dept. Physics, KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Korea. Motivation : Microarray Data.

Download Presentation

Dynamical response networks under perturbations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dynamical response networks under perturbations Seung-Woo Son, Dong-Hee Kim, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Hawoong Jeong Complex System and Statistical Physics Lab., Dept. Physics, KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Korea

  2. Motivation : Microarray Data • Microarray data show the response of each gene to an experiment, which is a kind of perturbation to the genetic network. • ex) gene deletion, temperature change etc • Like building the genetic network from microarray data, the secondary network can be constructed from the response of primary network under perturbation. • ex) node removal(?) • “ Can the secondary network represents the primary network correctly ? ” • “ What is the meaning of the response under perturbation ? ” • “ Ultimately, can we find out primary network from the secondary network ? ”

  3. Introduction : Node Removal Perturbations • When a node is removed, network structure changes. The network can break into several isolated clusters. • Giant cluster size decreases gradually and the average path length increases. R. Albert and A.-L.Barabási, Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47 (2002) • SF network is more tolerant against random removal better than random network. • In SF network, the diameter changes under a node removal follow the power-law distributtion. J.-H. Kim, K.-I. Goh, B. Kahng and D. Kim, Physical Review Letters, 91, 5 (2003)

  4. target start target start i j i 1 1 1 1 k k Introduction : Load & Betweenness Centrality • What is the “Load” ? • When every pair of nodes in a network exchanges data packets along the shortest path, load of a node is the total number of data packets passing through that node. • ex) Internet traffic jam j • Betweenness Centrality BC ( Freeman, 1977 ) • if is the number of geodesic paths from i to j and is the number of paths from i to j that pass through k, then is the proportion of geodesic paths from i to j that pass through k. The sum for all i,j pairs is betweenness centrality.

  5. cf) diameter changes Introduction : BC Changes . - BA model J.-H. Kim, K.-I. Goh, B. Kahng and D. Kim, Physical Review Letters, 91, 5 (2003)

  6. distribution is power law distribution with exponent 2.1 • Summation of BC changes after i-th node removal is linearly proportional to BC of i-th node in BA model. Distribution of . - BA model

  7. a 4 3 c 2 b 5 6 1 e d 4 1 7 3 f MST & Percolation Network • How to build the secondary network ? : Based on = “correlation” bewtween node i and j • MST (minimum spanning tree) A graph G = (V,E) with weighted edges. The subset of E of G of minimum weight which forms a tree on V ≡ MST .A node is linked to the most influential one with constraint such that N vertices must be connected only with (N-1) edges. • Percolation After sorting Δbi(j) in descending order, add a link between i and j following that order. When all nodes make a giant cluster, stop the attachment.It means the links with values Δbi(j) > b* (percolation threshold) are valid and connected. MST

  8. Result : Secondary Networks • The degree k of secondary networks contain the global information of primary network, because it is constructed from BC that is calculated from the information of whole network. • More sparse or dense networks which contain the information of original network can be constructed. • Secondary networks represent the primary network well with significant link matches. BA 100 MST Secondary network construction

  9. Result : Minimal Spanning Tree • In MST network, the degree distribution shows the power-law with exponent 2.2 not 3.0 ( Scale-free ) • The degree of each node in secondary network is linearly correlated to that of primary network.

  10. Result : Percolation Network • The degree distribution of percolation network shows power-law. ( exponent -1.9 ) • Percolation features appear during giant cluster fromation.

  11. 1 1 compare 6 6 2 2 3 0 3 0 5 4 5 4 Similarity Measurement between Two Networks • The links of each node are regarded as vector in N dimensional vector space. • Vector inner product shows the similarity between two networks. • Binary undirected network case : It means how many links are overlapping each other. • The network similarity measure between secondary and primary networks are significantly higher than other network. • ( MST : 90.8 % , percolation : 76.6 % ) • The secondary networks well represent the primary network.

  12. Conclusions & Future Works • Conclusions • Two secondary networks, MST & percolation network, reproduce the scale-free behavior and its degree of each node is in proportion to degree of primary network. Its degree contains the global information of primary network. • Similarity measurement shows that the secondary networks reproduce original network quite well. ( MST: 91% , percolation: 77% ) • BC change Δbi(j) values represent the interaction between i-node and j-node. And It is related to diameter change directly. • Δbi(j) and b(i) relations might help to explain network classification with BC distribution exponents. • Future Works • BC change calculation for other network models and real networks. • Precise relation between Δbi(j) and b(i) , analytic calculation. • Finding primary network from secondary network information.

  13. start D B A G E C F Distribution of BC Changes . bi : summation of BC after i-th node removed bo : summation of BC over whole network. bκ : summation of BC from κ-th node to all.

  14. Distribution of BC Changes . Δbi : ( i-th node removed ) summation of BC changes. 1 Network deformation = select alternative shortest path + detour ( Contribution to Δbi> 0 ) 2 Lost a source of BC = ( Contribution to Δbi< 0 ) 77.4% Contribution of Δbi = portion of b(i) select alternative shortest path + detour Nonlinear! 22.6%

  15. Distribution of BC Changes . • Small closeness centrality of A • Large sum of distance from A • Large ② contribution and small network deformation : A A Network B : B • Large closeness centrality of B • small sum of distance from B • small ② contribution and large network deformation ( λ: detour length )

  16. Next One? 0 6 2 1 4 3 5 Introduction : Scale-free network • What is the Scale Free Network? • SF network is the network with the power-law degree distribution. Ex) BA modelgrowth and preferential attachmentA.-L.Barabási and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286, 509 (1999) • Ex) Empirical Results of Real NetworksWorld-Wide Web, Internet, Movie actor collaboration network, Science collaboration graph, Cellular network, etc.R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L.Barabási, Nature(London), 406, 378 (2000) • SF network shows error and attack tolerance.

  17. start D B A G E C F Introduction : Load & Classification of networks • What is the “Load” ? • When every pair of nodes in a network exchanges data packets along the shortest path, load, or “betweenness centrality(BC),” of a node is the total number of data packets passing through that node. Ex) Internet traffic jam, influential people in social network, etc. δ is universal value ! • “It is found that the load distribution follows a power-law with the exponent δ~2.2(1)”K.-I. Goh, B. Kahng, and D. Kim, Universal Behavior of Load Distribution in Scale-Free Networks, PRL, 87, 27 (2001) • The exponent of load is robust without network model dependency. It can be used to classify the networks. • Kwang-Il Goh, et al., Classification of scale-free networks, PNAS, 99, 20 (2002)

More Related