Planck s Constant and the Photoelectric Effect

Planck s Constant and the Photoelectric Effect PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 400 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Download Presentation

Planck s Constant and the Photoelectric Effect

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


1. Planck’s Constant and the Photoelectric Effect Lulu Liu Partner: Pablo Solis

2. What is the Photoelectric Effect? Incident radiation

3. Predictions Classically, wave mechanics: Eradiation ? I ? E02

4. Presentation Outline Predicted relationship between E and ? Experimental techniques Set up and Parameters Current vs. retarding voltage data Analysis – Two Methods – Linear Fit Method Results and Error Conclusions and Summary

5. Hypothesis E = h ? ? is frequency h is Planck’s constant

6. The Experiment

7. Photocurrent vs. Retarding Voltage – Raw Data (Example)

8. Normalized Current vs. Retarding Voltage Curves for All Wavelengths

9. Linear Fit Method of Cut-off Voltage Determination Motivation: Using zero-crossings for Vs determination compromised by back currents and non-linear behavior. Does behave linearly at low and high limits (discounting forward current saturation). Fit the low and high voltage data to separate linear regressions. Extrapolate intersection point (Vs,I0) – baseline current. Use three points farthest from Vs. Reasonable chi-squared.

10. Results of the Linear Fit Method

11. Error Contributions and Calculations for Linear Fit Method Two linear regressions y = mx + b with uncertainties on m, ?m1 and ?m2, and b, ?b1 and ?b2 contribute to the error in the X-coordinate of their intersection (Vs) as follows:

12. Determination of Planck’s Constant Using Results from Both Methods Linear fit method: h = 9.4 £ 10-16 § 4.8 £ 10-16 eV¢ s Deviation point method: h = 2.9 £ 10-15 § 7.7 £ 10-16 eV ¢ s

13. Error Sources and Improvements for Future Trials Random error – cannot reduce but better characterization More trials, more independent trials (reset equipment? time between trials?)

14. Conclusions Verification of hypothesis observed light behave as a particle confirmed linear relation between E and ?

18. CPD – contact potential difference

19. Zero-Intercept Method

  • Login