1 / 11

By David Pimentel

Rule of Law Reform without Cultural Imperalism ? Reinforcing Customary Justice through Collatoral Review in South Sudan. By David Pimentel. David Pimentel . Professional Experience - Associate Professor at Florida Coastal School of Law faculty since 2007.

keaira
Download Presentation

By David Pimentel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ruleof Law Reform without Cultural Imperalism? ReinforcingCustomary Justice throughCollatoral Review in South Sudan By David Pimentel

  2. David Pimentel Professional Experience - Associate Professor at Florida Coastal School of Law faculty since 2007. - Consultant on the judiciary provisions being drafted for the new Nepali Constitution.   - former Head of the Rule of Law efforts in Southern Sudan for the UN mission. - former Chief of Court Management at the ICTY. - more than ten years' experience working inside the federal courts of the US. Education - University of California, Berkeley / Harvard Law School (3rd year) J.D. , 1988 • University of California, Berkeley M.A. Economics, 1987 Teaching and Scholarship - teaches Criminal Law, Torts, Remedies, Law and Economics, Comparative Law, and a seminar on International Rule of Law. • his research agenda focuses on international rule of law and post-conflict transitional justice focusing in particular on legal pluralism and the judiciaries of developing and post-war societies.  

  3. Rule of Law • „more than half the world‘s population lives ‚outside the law‘“; law graduates should „spread American principles of justice, especially in places that resist them“. • One argue that „rule of law is imperialistic per se“ ; „nonetheless, protection of principles of justice and human rights requires some intervention“

  4. A – The importance of Cultural Sensitivity • Sensitivity issue not only a matter of courtesy, but serious and legimitate concerns can be raised whether Western values are appropriate or even relevant in another culture • Not only just a principle of ethics, but also a pragmatic concern for success of the rule of law reform initiative (public confidence) • Deferring to local institutions and practices • not feasible to restore it to its pre-colonial state • determine which features of the present legal culture are valued in that society and which are destructive • Limits of cultural sensitivity • Not all systems of cultural values share equal legitimacy • Tolerance of cultural difference need not, and must not, require the acceptance of practices that violate the most fundamental principles of human rights and dignity

  5. B – The problem of Public Confidence • Foreign-looking legal system imposed on a post-conflict society is unlikely to inspire great public confidence. • Suspicion of the unfamiliar way exacerbate persisting suspicions of whether justice is attainable in a society that has never had the rule of law before. C – The problemof Limited Resources • -> inefficiency, corruption, or simple failuretoadherethehighstandardsofjusticeand human rights • Serious lack of human resources (peopleeducated in „higherlaw“ standards)

  6. South Sudan as a case in point • GoSS face the challenge of establishing rule of law norms and institutions • Practical impossibilty to bring a more „enlightened“ legal regime to the area • Customary law: • Handles 90% of legal disputes • Varies in the different tribes, but the customary courts function in similar ways • Unwritten (access for illiterate), cheap, on the spot, public confidence

  7. Drawing the line / Striking the balance • The British accepted customary law except where it was „repugnant to natural justice, equity, and good conscience“; for Pimentel „inherently offensive today…it implicitly substitutes the cultural conscience of British society for indigenous values.“ • For Pimentel, the line-drawing lies in the international treaties and conventions on human rights • No issue of foreign imposition ?

  8. How to draw the line • Codification of law? Ascertainment of law? Customary law can be effective only if it continues to be owned and developed and applied in traditional ways. • Training of judges of customary courts • Review by Higher Courts (statutory courts): appellate judges cannot second-guess the correctness of a lower court ruling if they are not applying the same law

  9. Collateral review as an alternative to appeal • Statutorycourtvestedwith power toreviewandoverturncustomarycourtsdecisions on thegroundthattheprocedure, outcome, orremedyviolatedminimunstandardsof human rightsorjudicialprocessguaranteed in theGoSSconstitution • Whatifperceivedas „normal“ andacceptableremedy, not somethingtobechallenged in statutorycourt? • Public education • Separate entitylikethe South Sudan Human RightsCommission (fedby NGO information/alerts) • Advantages (accordingPimentel): • maximizestheautonomyofcustomarycourts; • servestoeducatejudgesasto international standardsthat must becompliedwith; • integratescustomarylawintoruleoflawregime; • clearownershipbycommunityactors

  10. Conclusions • culturally-sensitive, public confidence, limited resources • Unwritten principles of customary law „…are important and largely irreplaceable institutions…“; „…effective in maintaining a sense of order, stability, and continuity in tribal societies.“ • „…statutory courts should be given power of collateral review of customary court decisions, not to second-guess the interpretation and application of customary law itself, but as a check on possible violations of larger principles of natural justice and human rights…“

  11. Criticism • Verypaternalistictext: Pimenteldecideswhat‘sbestforthem; perspectiveoropinionoflocalsis not an issue. • „Wehavetoworkwithwhatwehave.“ • Critizesapproachduringcolonialism, but areruleoflawinterventionsthat different? Ruleofwhoselaw? • Collatoralreviewapproach also instrumentofimposition • Minimal human rightsstandards • Whatarethe minimal human rightsstandards (orasDannesays: culturallyrelativistapproachto human rights)? • Who hasthe power ofdefinition? • International treatiesasinstrumentofimposition, not necessarilybased on a commonagreement -> donor-dependency, unequal power distribution

More Related