1 / 21

SSMSv2 Audits of America’s, AP and EMEA ControlCenter 5.2

SSMSv2 Audits of America’s, AP and EMEA ControlCenter 5.2. EDS SMC SSMSv2 August 9, 2007. Agenda. Review of Objectives Project Report Cards Status Progress Commonality of Issues across SMC’s. SSMSv2 Remote Audits – Summary of Objectives. Target Objective for Remote Site Audits

kaylee
Download Presentation

SSMSv2 Audits of America’s, AP and EMEA ControlCenter 5.2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SSMSv2 Audits of America’s, AP and EMEAControlCenter 5.2 EDS SMC SSMSv2 August 9, 2007

  2. Agenda • Review of Objectives • Project Report Cards • Status • Progress • Commonality of Issues across SMC’s

  3. SSMSv2 Remote Audits – Summary of Objectives Target Objective for Remote Site Audits • North America SMC’s • South America SMC’s • Asia Pacific SMC • Remote Site Audits • Assess the operational state of CC 5.2 • Update CC 5.2 related Documentation • Determine Upgrade Ability to CC 6.0 for SSMSv3

  4. SSMSv2 Onsite Audits – Summary of Objectives Target Objective for Onsite Audits • Poor Performing SMC’s • Highly Secured SMC’s • Onsite Site Audits • Assess the operational use of CC 5.2 • Interviews with Administrators • Assess the operational state of the CC 5.2 • Identify and Analysis of problems with CC 5.2 • Recommendations and Corrective Actions for stability • Update CC 5.2 Documentation • Determine Upgrade Ability to CC 6.0 for SSMSv3

  5. Project Status

  6. Project Progress

  7. Project Summary • Tulsa can not be audited remotely • Security restrictions impeded activity • Additional time required per site • Planned for 10 hours / site, is taking longer • Remote Site Audit Schedule Adjustments • Tulsa requires a new action plan • Reset delivery date for updated documentation • Finalization & Reviews start August 13th • Print and deliver by August 24th • Onsite Audit Schedule Adjustments • Russelsheim delivery of conclusions • Scheduling conflicts (Vacations, other projects) • Planned for August 17th

  8. Commonality of Issues across SMC’s Top 10 - Repetitive issues found • Agent and Infrastructure Management • Pro-Active Patch Management • Issues with SSMS Server maintenance • High number of in-active Agents • Managing Solutions Enabler, JAVA & NaviCLI • Monitoring of Active Console Alerts • Managing WLA • Compliance to ControlCenter Support Matrix • Growth of the managed environment • ControlCenter agent placement and policies management

  9. Agent and Infrastructure Management

  10. Pro-Active Patch Management • Installing Service Packs • Installing and Applying Patches (Hotfixes) Plano Charlotte Toronto Auburn Hills

  11. High number of in-active Agents • In-Active Agents need to be managed and kept to a minimum • Critical Agents that impact operations • Storage Agents • FCC Agents • WLA Archiver • Stores • Agents that impact reporting • Host Agents Plano Auburn Hills

  12. Issues with SSMS Server maintenance • Server OS configuration changes • MS Auto Update service • MS HF’s applied automatically • Maintaining Anti-Virus applications • Page files configurations • Not meeting MS Recommendations of 1.5x • Non-contiguous Page Files on the same HDD • Boot.ini settings • Multiple /PAE entries • /3GB switch • Changes applicable to Windows 2003 SP1 which impact ControlCenter • Data Execution Prevention • Running the SNMP TRAP listening service

  13. Monitoring of Active Console Alerts • Emitter does not forward ALL alerts • Emitter clears any alert in the queue greater then 24-hours old • Repetitive Critical Severity 1 & 2 alerts in the Alert History • Non Emitter forwarded alerts are not being resolved • Daily review of Alerts in the Console is a Best Practice • Emitter does not work well when there is a mixed Leveraged environment with a distributed support center. • Case sited with this issue is Europe where Russelsheim is the CC Center for remote locations around Europe

  14. Compliance to ControlCenter Support Matrix • SAN Maintenance and adherence to supported firmware • Equipment dropped from support Plano Charlotte

  15. Growth of Managed Environment • Planning for growth • New arrays with changing support requirements • Capacity planning of the infrastructure • Planning for change • Re-allocation of assets • GM moved to its own CC implementation from Auburn Hills & Plano • Commonwealth Bank of Australia – will produce a drastic change to Sydney environment. • GM – will produce a drastic change to Russelsheim environment.

  16. Managing Solutions Enabler, NaviCLI & Java • JAVA is being auto updated • FLARE dependencies not being followed • Mixed version of NaviCLI within a CLARiiON managed group • Managing older versions of FLARE with the latest NaviCLI Version • Rules are: • FLARE 24 – NaviCLI 6.24 • FLARE 22 – NaviCLI 6.22 • FLARE 19 and Below – NaviCLI 6.19 • Symmetrix dependencies to Solutions Enabler not being followed • Mixed versions of Solutions Enabler across agent servers • Newer DMX3 being managed with SE versions below 6.3.2 • Specific ControlCenter Hotfixes needed to Monitor, Report and Manage new versions of EMC Arrays

  17. ControlCenter agent placement and policies management • Agents on Remote Access Server • Agents added to Store Servers • Host agents installed on the CC Cluster • Not modifying Discovery Policies to accommodate for changes in the managed environment • Globally applying of policies when specific objects need to be monitored.

  18. Managing WLA • Additional Archivers installed when not required • Handling Policies • Use of Revolving and Analyst DCP • Applying Policies globally to all managed objects • Not creating object specific templates for detailed analysis • Ignoring WLA Archiver processing alerts

  19. How SMC’s are being Managed Plano Charlotte Toronto Auburn Hills

  20. Q&A Discussion • SMC’s • Doxford • Washington • Tulsa

More Related