500 likes | 705 Views
HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates. CMS proposal2.4% Market Basket Index inflation update1 point MBI reduction (Affordable Care Act required)2.5% reduction in outlier budget (Affordable Care Act required)3.79% case mix weight change adjustment in 2011 and 2012Eliminate hypertension codes from HHRG scori
E N D
1. Overview of the PPS Final Rule 2011 William A. Dombi
Mary St. Pierre
Theresa M. Forster
2. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates CMS proposal
2.4% Market Basket Index inflation update
1 point MBI reduction (Affordable Care Act required)
2.5% reduction in outlier budget (Affordable Care Act required)
3.79% case mix weight change adjustment in 2011 and 2012
Eliminate hypertension codes from HHRG scoring (estimated 1.78% revenue reduction)
3. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates CMS Final Rule
2.1% MBI
1 point MBI reduction (Affordable Care Act required)
2.5% reduction in outlier budget (Affordable Care Act required)
3.79% case mix weight change adjustment in 2011 (2012 not finalized)
Not applicable to non-routine medical supplies
hypertension codes maintained in HHRG scoring
4. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates Market Basket Index Update
Reduced from proposed 2.4 to 2.1
Change due to use of more current data
Third quarter 2010 forecast using data through second quarter 2010
5. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates Outlier Payments
Annual outlier budget set at 5% but only with 2.5% spent on outliers (Affordable Care Act)
2.5% shifted from base rates as it was included for one year only in 2010
10 percent provider specific cap on outliers
Fixed Dollar Loss ratio remains at 0.67
Purpose of change is to control outlier abuses
Outlier spending increased from 2.69%(2004) to 6.59%(2008) of all HH spending
6. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates Case Mix Weight Change Adjustment
CMS still believes that increase from 1.09 average weight to 1.3085 not related to patient change
2012 adjustment not finalized as CMS to re-evaluate its assessment methodology
NAHC will propose alternative methodology
Risk remains that future reductions/adjustments will be imposed
7. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates Hypertension
CMS proposed to drop from HHRG scoring claiming data showed no connection to resource use
NAHC argued that dropping would be a “double-hit”
CMS had 3 choices: restore to scoring, eliminate creep adjustment impact, recalibrate all case mix weights
Restoration for now—estimated at 1.78% revenue impact
More from Mary in a moment
8. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates $2,312.94 2010 episodic base rate
Divided by 0.975 2.5% outlier budget shift
X 0.95 Outlier budget
X 1.011 Market Basket Index minus 1 point
X 0.9621 3.79% case mix case weight change adjustment
$2,192.07 2011 Base Episode Rate
$2,257.83 2011 Rural Base Episode Rate
Minus 2% w/o quality data submission
9. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates non-rural rural
HH Aide $50.42 $51.93
MSS $178.46 $183.81
OT $122.54 $126.22
PT $121.73 $125.38
SN $111.32 $114.66
SLP $132.27 $136.24
These per visit rates are reduced by 2 percentage points if the HHA did not submit quality data.
10. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates Severity Level Non-Rural NRS Rural NRS Amount
1 $14.18 $14.61
2 $51.18 $52.72
3 $140.34 $144.55
4 $208.51 $214.77
5 $321.53 $331.18
6 $553.00 $569.59
These amounts are reduced by 2 percentage points if the HHA did not submit quality data
11. HH PPS 2011 Payment Rates LUPA ADD-ON
$93.31 non-rural
$96.11 rural
2% reduction w/o quality data
12. Future HH PPS Payment Rates 2014 rebasing
May result in varied rates
CMS study on vulnerable populations
Case mix weight change adjustment analysis
New MedPAC case mix adjustment model in development
13. Co-Morbidities: Hypertension Proposed change: eliminate
Unspecified essential hypertension
Benign hypertension
Assumption: MD inappropriate labeling of pre-hypertensive patients
14. Co-Morbidities: Hypertension Final Rule:
Defer removal of hypertension diagnosis codes
Conduct research
Compare resource utilization
Reallocate points for budget neutrality if research does not support resource utilization
Entertain suggestions of other policies to prevent up-coding and manipulation of case-mix measures.
15. Co-Morbidities: Hypertension CMS Additional Plan
Target providers for review who have
Substantive growth in these codes
Higher than expected instances of reporting
CMS Reference to Diagnosis Guidance
Attachment D instruction: only code diagnoses if:
Addressed in the HH plan of care, and
Affects the patient’s responsiveness to treatment and rehabilitative prognosis.
CMS Advisory: Since pre-hypertension not a disease category:
Coding 401.1 or 401.9 for pre-hypertensive patients not appropriate
16. Home Health Face-to-Face Encounter: Basis Affordable Care Act: Prior to certifying eligibility, must document
Face-to-face encounter with
Physician or
NPP (NP or CNS in collaboration, PA under supervision of certifying physician)
Communicates to physician who certifies
May be by telehealth
17. Face-to-Face Encounter: Regulation Face-to-Face encounter as a condition for payment
Applies to certification, not recertification
Up to 90 days prior to start of care, or
Up to 30 days after start of care
RAP payment not affected
Reason for encounter: related to reason for home care
18. Face-to-Face Encounter: Regulation Encounter by physician ordering services and signing plan of care
Physician and NPP
Hospitalist to initiate services
Who may (or may not) follow patient
Expect identification of community physician in discharge plan
Update plan by community physician
Telehealth
Subject to the requirements in section 1834(m)
Patient to be located at one of several specified types of originating sites
19. Face-to-Face Encounter: Documentation Documentation of encounter and why:
Clinical finding support eligibility
Need nursing or therapy
Homebound status
Separate section or addendum
BY PHYSICIAN
No standardized language allowed
20. Face-to-Face Encounter: Physician/NPP Employment Stark and anti-kickback rules apply (including exceptions and safe harbors)
Physician
NPP
Prohibition on hiring physicians to perform face-to-face:
Medical directors
Certifying physicians
21. Face-to-Face: Enforcement CMS eliminated proposal for documentation in physician medical record
No plan to use physician claims to validate
Responsibility on HHA to ensure encounters occur
Instructions planned for contractors to ensure compliance
Other program integrity oversight likely
22. Face-to-Face Encounter CMS action plan
Educate physicians
Manual instructions
Clarification needed
Impact on payment if encounter outside timelines
Hospitalist role
Role of other institutional physicians
Appropriate beneficiary notice
No HHABN
23. Hospice Face-to-Face (F2F) Legislative requirement: On or after Jan. 1, 2011, a hospice physician or nurse practitioner (NP) must have a face-to-face encounter with a patient prior to the 180th day or subsequent recertification
Hospice physician/NP must attest to encounter having taken place
Origination: 2009 MedPAC recommendation; enacted as part of Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148)
24. Hospice F2F Regulatory Changes Regulatory changes effective Jan. 1, 2011:
Certification/recertification:
-- Time frame set at 15 calendar days
-- Must be signed and dated by physician and include benefit period dates to which the cert/recert apply
Face –Face/Attestation:
-- Encounter with hospice physician/NP for patients whose total stay across all hospices will extend into the 3rd or subsequent benefit period
-- Attestation of the encounter includes patient name, date of visit, signed and dated; must be separate and distinct section of or addendum to recertification form; clearly titled and identifiable
25. Hospice F2F Regulatory Changes
Face-Face/Attestation: (cont.)
-- If NP conducts encounter: must attest that clinical findings were provided to certifying physician
-- If physician conducts encounter: should also compose narrative and sign certification
-- Face-to-face must be conducted within the 30 calendar days prior to recertification
Physician narrative:
-- Narrative statement must be directly above physician signature
-- Narrative for 3rd or later benefit period must include explanation of why clinical findings from face-to-face support 6 month life expectancy
26. Hospice F2F Regulatory Changes OF NOTE:
-- No payment for F2F (administrative); BUT appropriate physician-level services provided in conjunction may be billed through hospice (NP must be attending)
-- Encounter may occur in home or at physician office if safe for patient (transport must optimize comfort; cost of special transport covered by hospice per diem)
-- Special note: entire time on hospice care applies -- use CWF, patient/representative, HETS 270/271
-- If patient/family refuse face-face, potential for discharge for cause (418.26)
27. Hospice F2F Regulatory Changes -- Physician can be contract, employee or volunteer; medical resident or fellow Ok if employed/contracted (narrative, certification reqs. apply)
-- NP must be employee or volunteer (receive W2) so can be FT, PT, per diem
-- Prior F2F by other hospice can’t substitute; transfers within benefit period do not require F2F if records verify previous F2F
-- No telehealth
-- Electronic signatures OK
-- Don’t report on claims
28. Therapy Clarifications: Basis Basis for coverage all therapy services (including maintenance and transient conditions)
Unique clinical condition of patient
Specialized skills, knowledge, and judgment of qualified therapist required
29. Therapy Clarifications: Coverage Criteria Requires that:
Qualified therapist assess, establish goals and re-assess patient
Measurable treatment goals be described :
Plan of care
Clinical record
Methods used to assess a patient’s function include
Objective measurement
Successive comparison of measurements
There be objective measurement of progress toward goals and/or therapy effectiveness.
30. Therapy Clarifications: Documentation Documentation requirements
Evaluation and goals
Describe correlation between
Treatment for illness/injury to professional standards
Measurable goal related to illness/injury
Objective measures of function (e.g. swallow, bathing, dressing, walking, stairs, use of devices)
31. Therapy Clarifications: Assessment/Reassessment Professional (qualified) therapist assessment
Functional assessment for therapy provided
By qualified therapist from each discipline
Documentation
Results of therapy
Effectiveness of therapy (or lack of)
32. Therapy Clarifications: Assessment/Reassessment Qualified therapist (vs. assistant) visits to functionally assess and treat
At least every 30 days by each discipline, and
On 13th and 19th visit
33. Therapy Clarifications: Assessment/Reassessment 13th and 19th visit exceptions
Rural areas or when documented circumstances outside control of therapist, reassess
10th to 13th visit
16th to 19th visit
Multiple therapy disciplines
On 13th and 19th visits
By corresponding therapist during visit closest to 13th and 19th therapy visit
Flexibility to avoid added visits
34. Therapy Clarifications: Example CVA patient receiving PT 3x/wk, OT 2x/wk
PT initiated January 2nd
OT initiated January 3
13th visit on January 18 by qualified PT
Qualified OT visit may be January 9 or 12
19th visit on January 26 by qualified OT
Qualified PT visit may be January 16 or 18
35. Therapy Clarification: Coverage Coverage criteria for continued therapy (non-maintenance)
If lack of progress to goals: therapist and physician determination of continuation
Supportable statement to continue therapy and why goals attainable
36. Therapy Clarifications: Coverage Documentation content
Assessment of effectiveness related to goals
Plan for continuing or discontinuing service
Changes to goals or care plan update
Objective evidence or statement of expectation of continued progress toward goals
37. Therapy Clarifications: Coverage Assessment
Comprehensive assessment not required
Limited to functional assessment of deficits as related to plan of care & goals of service
CMS developing manual guidance
38. Therapy Clarifications: Coverage Denial of coverage
Until qualified therapist
Completes assessment and goal measurement
Goal attainment/need for revision determined
Documentation requirements met
39. Therapy Clarifications: Maintenance Therapy Therapy coverage based on “reasonable expectation of material improvement”
Exception: maintenance therapy by qualified therapist
Design or establish effective maintenance program
Specific to illness or injury
Requires skills of therapist
Identifies program design, instruction, reevaluation
40. Therapy Clarifications: Agency Action Requirements effective date : April 1, 2011
Identify resources, assessment tools & measures, and protocols
Educate clinicians
Develop visit mapping strategies
Work with software vendors
41. HH CAHPS Dry run: 1 month data 3rd quarter 2010
Continuous full reporting: 4th quarter 2010 & 1st quarter 2011
Exemption (less than 60 eligible pts and new agencies)
Exemption and dry run deadlines: January 21, 2011
Failure to participate in CAHPS: market basket minus 2%
42. Notification: Additional Billing Codes New billing HCPCs codes planned as “administrative change”
Pre-notification to home health in NPR : July 2010
Implementation planned: January 2011
43. Billing Codes CMS planned code changes (each 15 minutes)
G0151: Qualified PT
G0152: Qualified OT
G0153: Qualified SLP
G-Code 1: PTA
G-Code 2: OTA
G-Code 3: Maintenance therapy by qualified PT
G-Code 4: Maintenance therapy by qualified OT
G-Code 5: Maintenance therapy by qualified SLP
G0154: Skilled licensed nurse
G-Code 6: M&E and O&A combined
CMS will amend proposal and assign a separate codes for each
G-Code 7: Skilled licensed nurse training/education patient or family
Consideration for future rulemaking
Separate codes for RN versus LPN services
44. “Grouping” Claims by CMS Impetus to CMS proposal: complexity of case-mix and increase in HIPPS code errors
CMS solicited comments on:
Reporting of code for all OASIS case-mix items on claim
Assignment of HIPPS by CMS
45. “Grouping” Claims by CMS CMS response and input:
Continue to analyze and resolve problems with capturing secondary diagnoses scores
If adopted”
Grouper HHRG software will be available to providers and vendors
Beta testing will be conducted
OASIS corrections handled by claim cancellation and resubmission
CMS assigned HIPPS will be:
Added to the claim record with online look-up
Returned on the electronic remittance advice
46. 36 Months Rule: Ownership Changes Limits sales and acquisitions of HHAs within 36 months of initial Medicare enrollment or within 36 months of certain changes in ownership
Medicare billing privileges and provider agreement do not transfer when rule applicable
Must reapply to Medicare and pass survey
Applies to majority changes in ownership (>50%)
Cumulative changes over 36 months
Important exceptions
47. 36 Months Rule: Ownership Changes Concerns Addressed in New Rule
Corporate reorganizations
Acquisitions by experienced companies
Death of an owner
Lenders/Investors bankruptcy protection
Direct vs., Indirect ownership changes
Nonprofit companies
Effective date
48. 36 Months Rule: Ownership Changes “Change in Majority Ownership”
More than 50% direct ownership interest
W/in 36 months of initial Medicare enrollment or the 36 months following the most recent change in majority ownership
Includes cumulative changes in ownership
Includes asset sales, stock transfers, consolidations, or mergers
49. 36 Months Rule: Ownership Changes Exceptions
The HHA submitted two consecutive years of full cost reports
HHA’s parent company is undergoing an internal restructuring
HHA owners changing existing business structure, e.g. LLC to corporation, but owners remain the same
Individual owner dies
50. 36 Months Rule: Ownership Changes Important elements
Applies only to direct ownership changes
Major change in rule’s application
CMS will monitor for abuses
Equal application to nonprofits
Applies to “majority ownership changes” after January 1, 2011
Existing rule applies through December 31, 2010 (100% ownership change; different exceptions)
CMS states that it will abide by bankruptcy court order (concern that ownership changes through bankruptcy will trigger rule making HHA worthless)
51. New HHA Capitalization New HHA must satisfy “initial operating reserve funds” requirement or will be denied billing privileges
Includes all new provider number HHAs
Compliance from the point of application through 3 months following conveyance of billing privileges for the 3 month period thereafter
CMS will provide sufficient information to determine capitalization levels and notification when the amount changes
Funds can be used during first 3 months of operation