Matrix Row-Column Sampling for the Many-Light Problem
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 46

Matrix Row-Column Sampling for the Many-Light Problem PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Matrix Row-Column Sampling for the Many-Light Problem. Milo š Ha š an (Cornell University) Fabio Pellacini (Dartmouth College) Kavita Bala (Cornell University). Complex Illumination: A Challenge. Conversion to Many Lights. Area, indirect, sun/sky.

Download Presentation

Matrix Row-Column Sampling for the Many-Light Problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Matrix row column sampling for the many light problem

Matrix Row-Column Sampling for the Many-Light Problem

Miloš Hašan (Cornell University)

Fabio Pellacini (Dartmouth College)

Kavita Bala (Cornell University)

Complex illumination a challenge

Complex Illumination: A Challenge

Conversion to many lights

Conversion to Many Lights

  • Area, indirect, sun/sky

Courtesy Walter et al., Lightcuts, SIGGRAPH 05/06

A matrix interpretation

A Matrix Interpretation

Lights (100,000)



Problem statement

Problem Statement

  • Compute sum of columns

  • Note: We don’t have the matrix data


= Σ (



Indirect illumination many lights

Indirect Illumination  Many Lights


Σ (


100,000 point lights

Environment map many lights

Environment Map  Many Lights


Σ (


100,000 point lights

Sun sky indirect many lights

Sun, Sky, Indirect  Many Lights


Σ (


100,000 point lights

Brute force takes minutes

Brute Force Takes Minutes

  • Why not sum all columns?

    • With 100,000 lights, still several minutes

10 min

13 min

20 min

Our contribution

Our Contribution

  • Fast, accurate, GPU-based approximation

  • Application: Preview for lighting design

Brute force:

10 min

13 min

20 min

Our result:

3.8 sec

13.5 sec

16.9 sec

Related work

Related Work

Many lights (CPU-based):Walter et al 05/06, Ward 94, Paquette et al 98, Wald et al 03, …

Instant radiosity & related:Keller 97, Dachsbacher & Stamminger 05/06, Laine et al 07, …

Environment maps:Agarwal et al 03, Ostromoukhov et al 04, …

Precomputation-based:Sloan et al 02/03, Ng et al 03/04, Ben-Artzi et al 06, Hasan et al 06, Ritschel et al 07, …

Other global illumination:Ward et al 88, Jensen 96, Hanrahan et al 91, Christensen 97, Scheel 01/02, Gautron et al 05, Krivanek et al 06, Dachsbacher et al 07, …

Insight 1 matrix has structure

Insight #1: Matrix has structure

  • Compute small subset of elements

  • Reconstruct

643 lights

900 pixels

A simple scene

30 x 30 image

The matrix

Insight 2 sampling pattern matters

Insight #2: Sampling Pattern Matters



Point-to-many-points visibility: Shadow-mapping

Point-to-point visibility: Ray-tracing

Row column duality

Row-Column Duality

  • Columns: Regular Shadow Mapping

Shadow map at light position

Surface samples

Row column duality1

Row-Column Duality

  • Rows: Also Shadow Mapping!

Shadow map at sample position

Image as a weighted column sum

Image as a Weighted Column Sum

  • The following is possible:

compute very small subset of columns

compute weighted sum

  • Use rows to choose a good set of columns!

Exploration and exploitation

Exploration and Exploitation


how to choose columns and weights?

compute rows (explore)

choose columns and weights

compute columns (exploit)

weighted sum

Reduced matrix

Reduced Matrix

Reduced columns

Clustering approach

Clustering Approach

Choose representative columns

Reduced columns

Choose k clusters

Reduced full

Reduced  Full

Use the same representatives for the full matrix

Representative columns

Weighted sum

Visualizing the reduced columns

radius = norm

Visualizing the Reduced Columns

Reduced columns: vectors in high-dimensional space

visualize as …

Clustering illustration

Clustering Illustration

Columns with various intensities can be clustered

Strong but similar columns

Weak columns can be clustered more easily

The clustering metric

The Clustering Metric

  • Minimize:

  • where:

total cost of all clusters

squared distance between normalized reduced columns

norms of the reduced columns

cost of a cluster

sum over all pairs in it

How to minimize

How to minimize?

  • Problem is NP-hard

  • Not much previous research

  • Should handle large input:

    • 100,000 points

    • 1000 clusters

  • We introduce 2 heuristics:

    • Random sampling

    • Divide & conquer

Clustering by random sampling

Clustering by Random Sampling

Very fast (use optimized BLAS)

Some clusters might be too small / large

Clustering by divide conquer

Clustering by Divide & Conquer

Splitting small clusters is fast

Splitting large clusters is slow

Combined clustering algorithm

Combined Clustering Algorithm

Combined clustering algorithm1

Combined Clustering Algorithm

Full algorithm

Full Algorithm

Assemble rows into reduced matrix

Cluster reduced columns

Compute rows (GPU)

Choose representatives

Weighted sum

Compute columns (GPU)



  • We show 5 scenes:

  • Show reference and 5x difference image

  • All scenes have 100,000+ lights

  • Timings

    • NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX

    • Light / surface sample creation not included





Grand Central

Results kitchen

Results: Kitchen

5x diff

  • 388k polygons

  • Mostly indirect illumination

  • Glossy surfaces

  • Indirect shadows

Reference: 13 min (using all 100k lights)

Our result: 13.5 sec (432 rows + 864 columns)

Results temple

Results: Temple

5x diff

  • 2.1m polygons

  • Mostly indirect & sky illumination

  • Indirect shadows

Our result: 16.9 sec (300 rows + 900 columns)

Reference: 20 min (using all 100k lights)

Results trees

Results: Trees

5x diff

  • 328k polygons

  • Complex incoherent geometry

Reference: 14 min (using all 100k lights)

Our result: 2.9 sec (100 rows + 200 columns)

Results bunny

Results: Bunny

5x diff

  • 869k polygons

  • Incoherent geometry

  • High-frequency lighting

  • Kajiya-Kay hair shader

Our result: 3.8 sec (100 rows + 200 columns)

Reference: 10 min (using all 100k lights)

Results grand central

Results: Grand Central

5x diff

  • 1.5m polygons

  • Point lights between stone blocks

Our result: 24.2 sec (588 rows + 1176 columns)

Reference: 44 min (using all 100k lights)

The value of exploration

The Value of Exploration

Our result

(432 rows + 864 columns)

No exploration

(Using 1455 lights)

Equal time comparison

The value of exploration1

The Value of Exploration

Our result

No exploration

Equal time comparison: 5x difference from reference



  • Fast, high quality approximation for many lights

    • GPU-oriented

    • Sample rows to explore low-rank structure

    • Sample well-chosen columns

  • Application: Preview for lighting design

    • Indirect illumination

    • Environment maps

    • Arbitrary lights and shaders

Future work

Future Work

  • How many rows + columns?

    • Pick automatically

  • Row / column alternation

  • Progressive algorithm:

    • stop when user likes the image

  • Render multiple frames at once?



  • Veronica Sundstedt and Patrick Ledda

    • Temple scene

  • Bruce Walter, PCG @ Cornell

  • NSF CAREER 0644175

  • Affinito-Stewart Award

Thank you

Thank You

Discarded slides

Discarded slides

Indirect illumination many lights1

Indirect Illumination  Many Lights

  • shoot photons from light sources

  • deposit on every bounce

  • treat photons as point lights

  • cosine-weighted emission

Low rank assumption

Low Rank Assumption

Worst case: lights with very local contribution

The value of exploration2

The Value of Exploration

Our result

(432 rows + 864 columns)

No exploration

(Using 1992 lights)

Equal time comparison

The value of exploration3

The Value of Exploration

Our result

No exploration

Equal time comparison: 5x difference image

  • Login