Standard solar models i aldo serenelli institute for advanced study princeton
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 33

Standard Solar Models I Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 54 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Standard Solar Models I Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton. SUSSP61: Neutrino Physics - St. Andrews, Scotland – 8 th to 23 rd , August, 2006. John N. Bahcall (1934-2005). Plan. Lecture 1 Motivation: Solar models – Solar neutrinos connection Stellar structure equations

Download Presentation

Standard Solar Models I Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Standard solar models i aldo serenelli institute for advanced study princeton

Standard Solar Models IAldo SerenelliInstitute for Advanced Study, Princeton

SUSSP61: Neutrino Physics - St. Andrews, Scotland – 8th to 23rd, August, 2006


Standard solar models i aldo serenelli institute for advanced study princeton

John N. Bahcall (1934-2005)


Standard solar models i aldo serenelli institute for advanced study princeton

Plan

Lecture 1

  • Motivation: Solar models – Solar neutrinos connection

  • Stellar structure equations

  • Standard Solar Models (SSM) - setting up the problem

  • Overview of helioseismology

  • History of the SSM in 3 steps

Lecture 2

  • SSM 2005/2006

  • New Solar Abundances: troubles in paradise?

  • Theoretical uncertainties: power-law dependences and Monte Carlo simulations

  • Summary


Motivation

Motivation

  • The Sun as a paradigm of a low-mass star. Standard test case for stellar evolution. Sun is used to callibrate stellar models

  • Neutrinos from the Sun: only direct evidence of solar energy sources (original proposal for the Homestake experiment that led to the Solar Neutrino Problem)

  • Neutrino oscillations: onstraints in the determination of LMA solution. However, SNO and SK data dominate  importance of SSM minor


Motivation1

Motivation

  • Transition between MSW effect and vacuum oscillations at ~5 MeV. 99.99% of solar neutrinos below 2 MeV: additional neutrino physics at very low energies?

  • Direct measurements of 7Be (pep, pp?) (Borexino, KamLAND, SNO+) key to astrophysics. Check the luminosity constraint

  • Future measurement of CNO fluxes? Answer to Solar Abundance Problem?


What is inside a standard solar models stellar structure basic assumptions

What is inside a Standard Solar Models?Stellar structure – Basic assumptions

  • The Sun is a self-gravitating object

  • Spherical symmetry

  • No rotation

  • No magnetic field


Stellar structure hydrostatic equilibrium 1 2

1D Euler equation – Eulerian description (fixed point in space)

Numerically, Lagrangian description (fixed mass point) is easier (1D)

here m denotes a concentric mass shell

and using

and

Euler equation becomes

Stellar structure – Hydrostatic equilibrium 1/2


Stellar structure hydrostatic equilibrium 2 2

Hydrodynamic time-scale thydr:

thydr << any other time-scale in the solar interior:

hydrostatic equilibrium is an excellent approximation

(1)

Stellar structure – Hydrostatic equilibrium 2/2


Stellar structure mass conservation

(2)

Stellar structure – Mass conservation

We already used the relation

leading to


Stellar structure energy equation 1 2

Lmis the energy flux through a sphere of mass m; in the absence of energy sources

where

Additional energy contributions (sources or sinks) can be represented by a total specific rate e (erg g-1 s-1)

Possible contributions to e: nuclear reactions, neutrinos (nuclear and thermal), axions, etc.

Stellar structure – Energy equation 1/2


Stellar structure energy equation 2 2

(3)

In the present Sun the integrated contribution of eg to the solar luminosity is only ~ 0.02% (theoretical statement)

Solar luminosity is almost entirely of nuclear origin 

Luminosity constrain:

Stellar structure – Energy equation 2/2

In a standard solar model we include nuclear and neutrino contributions (thermal neutrinos are negligible):

e = en– en (taking en > 0)


Stellar structure energy transport radiative transport 1 2

If D is the diffusion coefficient, then the diffusive flux is given by

c is the speed of light and a is the radiation-density constant and U is the radiation energy density.

and in the case of radiation

and

where

In 1-D we get

Stellar structure – Energy transportRadiative transport 1/2

Mean free path of photons lph=1/kr (k opacity, r density)

Typical values k=0.4cm2g-1, r=1.4 g cm-3  lph2cm

lph /R8310-11  transport as a diffusion process


Stellar structure energy transport radiative transport 2 2

The flux F and the luminosity Lm are related by

and the transport equation can be written as

or, in lagrangian coordinates

Using the hydrostatic equilibrium equation, we define the radiative temperature gradient as

and finally

(4)

Stellar structure – Energy transportRadiative transport 2/2


Stellar structure energy transport convective transport 1 3

r+Dr: P+DP, T+DT,

r+Dr

b

Adiabactic displacement

s

s

r: P, T, r

b

Stability condition:

Using hydrostatic equilibrium, and

Stellar structure – Energy transportConvective transport 1/3


Stellar structure energy transport convective transport 2 3

Divide by

and get

Schwarzschild criterion for dynamical stability

When does convection occur?

large Lm (e.g. cores of stars M*>1.3M8)

regions of large k (e.g. solar envelope)

Stellar structure – Energy transportConvective transport 2/3


Stellar structure energy transport convective transport 3 3

where

is the actual temperature gradient and satisfies

Fconv and  must be determined from convection theory (solution to full hydrodynamic equations)

Easiest approach: Mixing Length Theory (involves 1 free param.)

Energy transport equation

(4b)

Stellar structure – Energy transportConvective transport 3/3

Using definition of

and

we can write

and, if there is convection: F=Frad+Fconv


Stellar structure composition changes 1 4

The chemical composition of a star changes due to

Relative element mass fraction:

  • Convection

  • Microscopic diffusion

  • Nuclear burning

  • Additional processes: meridional circulation, gravity waves, etc. (not considered in SSM)

X hydrogen mass fraction, Y helium and “metals” Z= 1-X-Y

Stellar structure – Composition changes 1/4


Stellar structure composition changes 2 4

Microscopic diffusion (origin in pressure, temperature and concentration gradients). Very slow process: tdiff>>1010yrs

here wi are the diffusion velocities (from Burgers equations for multicomponent gases, Burgers 1969)

Dominant effect in stars: sedimentation H Y & Z 

Convection (very fast) tends to homogenize composition

where Dconv is the same for all elements and is determined from convection treatment (MLT or other)

Stellar structure – Composition changes 2/4


Stellar structure composition changes 3 4

Stellar structure – Composition changes 3/4

Nuclear reactions (2 particle reactions, decays, etc.)

here

(v) is the relative velocity distrib. and s(v) is cross section

Sun: main sequence star  hydrogen burning

low mass  pp chains (~99%), CNO (~1%)

Basic scheme: 4p  4He + 2b+ + 2ne+ ~25/26 MeV


Interlude on hydrogen burning pp chains

Q=1.44 MeV, <Qn>=0.265 pp neutrinos

Q=Qn=1.44 pep neutrinos

Q=5.49

Q=12.86

ppI

88-89%

Q=1.59

Q=Qn=0.86 (90%)-0.38 (10%)

Q=17.35

7Be neutrinos

ppII

10%

Q=0.137

8B neutrinos Q=17.98, <Qn>=6.71

Marginal reaction:

ppIII

1%

Q=19.795, <Qn>=9.625 hep neutrinos

Interlude on hydrogen burning – pp chains


Interlude on hydrogen burning cno cycle

Q=1.94

Q=2.22, <Qn>=0.707 13N neutrinos

CN-cycle

Q=7.55

Q=7.30

Q=2.75, <Qn>=0.996 13N neutrinos

Q=4.97

Q=12.13

Q=0.600

NO-cycle

Q=2.76, <Qn>=0.999 17F neut.

Q=1.19

Interlude on hydrogen burning – CNO cycle

CNO cycle is regulated by 14N+p reation (slowest)


Stellar structure composition changes 4 4

Stellar structure – Composition changes 4/4

Composition changes

i=1,…..,N

(5)


Stellar structure complete set of equations

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Stellar structure – Complete set of equations

Microscopic physics: equation of state, radiative opacities, nuclear cross sections


Standard solar model what we do 1 2

Standard Solar Model – What we do 1/2

Solve eqs. 1 to 5 with good microphysics, starting from a Zero Age Main Sequence (chemically homogeneous star) to present solar age


Standard solar model what we do 2 2

Construct a 1M8 initial model with Xini, Zini, (Yini=1- Xini-Zini) and aMLT, evolve it during t8 and match (Z/X)8, L8 and R8 to better than one part in 10-5

Standard Solar Model – What we do 2/2

3 free parameters:

  • Convection theory has 1 free parameter:aMLT determines the temperature stratification where convection is not adiabatic (upper layers of solar envelope)

  • 2 of the 3 quantities determining the initial composition: Xini, Yini, Zini (linked by Xini+Yini+Zini=1). Individual elements grouped in Zini have relative abundances given by solar abundance measurements (e.g. GS98, AGS05)


Standard solar model predictions

Standard Solar Model – Predictions

  • Eight neutrino fluxes: production profiles and integrated values. Only 8B flux directly measured (SNO) so far

  • Chemical profiles X(r), Y(r), Zi(r)  electron and neutron density profiles (needed for matter effects in neutrino studies)

  • Thermodynamic quantities as a function of radius: T, P,

  • density(r), sound speed(c)

  • Surface heliumYsurf (Z/X and 1=X+Y+Z leave 1 degree of freedom)

  • Depth of the convective envelope, RCZ


The sun as a pulsating star overview of helioseismology 1 4

  • Discovery of oscillations: Leighton et al. (1962)

  • Sun oscillates in > 105 eigenmodes

  • Frequencies of order mHz (5-min oscillations)

  • Individual modes characterized by radial n, angular l and longitudinal m numbers

The Sun as a pulsating star - Overview of Helioseismology 1/4


The sun as a pulsating star overview of helioseismology 2 4

The Sun as a pulsating star - Overview of Helioseismology 2/4

  • Doppler observations of spectral lines: velocities of a few cm/s are measured

  • Differences in the frequencies of order mHz: very long observations are needed. BiSON network (low-l modes) has data collected for  5000 days

  • Relative accuracy in frequencies 10-5


The sun as a pulsating star overview of helioseismology 3 4

The Sun as a pulsating star - Overview of Helioseismology 3/4

  • Solar oscillations are acoustic waves (p-modes, pressure is the restoring force) stochastically excited by convective motions

  • Outer turning-point located close to temperature inversion layer. Inner turning-point varies, strongly depends on l (centrifugal barrier)

Credit: Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard


The sun as a pulsating star overview of helioseismology 4 4

  • Oscillation frequencies depend on r, P, g, c

  • Inversion problem: using measured frequencies and from a reference solar model determine solar structure

Output of inversion procedure:dc2(r), dr(r), RCZ, YSURF

Relative difference of c between Sun and BP00

The Sun as a pulsating star - Overview of Helioseismology 4/4


History of the ssm in 3 steps

  • Step 2. Precise calculations of radiative opacities (OPAL group). Helioseismology: results from low and mid-l sample well the solar interior (1995-1997).

  • SSM correct in solar interior to better than 1%

Bahcall et al. 1996

History of the SSM in 3 steps

  • Step 1. Predictions of neutrino fluxes by the SSM to high (factor 2.5/3) w.r.t. to radiochemichal experiments: solar neutrino problem. 8B flux too sensitive to central temperature (8B)T20-25. Problem with SSM? Specultive solutions of all kinds. This lasted about 30 years.


History of the ssm in 3 steps1

  • Step 3. The BP00 model and Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

BP00: Bahcall, Pinsonneualt & Basu (2001)

History of the SSM in 3 steps

RCZ=0.714 / 0.713 ± 0.001

YSUP=0.244 / 0.249 ± 0.003

F(8B)= (5.05 ± 0.91) x 106 cm-2 s-1

FSK(8B)= (2.32 ± 0.09) x 106 cm-2 s-1 (only sensitive to ne)


History of the ssm in 3 steps2

SNO collaboration (2002)

FBP00(8B)/ FSNO(8B)= 0.99

Solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem !!!!

History of the SSM in 3 steps

  • Step 3. SNO: direct measurement of the (8B) flux.


  • Login