1 / 22

Making a Dent in Construction and Demolition Debris or

Making a Dent in Construction and Demolition Debris or. Getting More and Less Than You Bargained For Baltimore, MD September 17, 2003. Stephen M Bantillo City of San Jose, Environmental Services Department Integrated Waste Management 777 N. First Street, Suite 300, San Jose, CA 95112

katy
Download Presentation

Making a Dent in Construction and Demolition Debris or

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Making a Dent in Construction and Demolition Debris or Getting More and Less Than You Bargained For Baltimore, MD September 17, 2003 Stephen M Bantillo City of San Jose, Environmental Services Department Integrated Waste Management 777 N. First Street, Suite 300, San Jose, CA 95112 (408) 277-3846 / (408) 277-3669 fax / stephen.bantillo@ci.sj.ca.us

  2. CDDD Overview • Builder/Contractor applies for permit • Deposit assessed based on square footage and type of project

  3. CDDD Overview • C&D materials hauled to Certified Facility

  4. CDDD Overview • Contractor returns receipts/records to City for Deposit refund

  5. Deposit Amounts Building Segment Rate $/SqFt Residential New Construction $0.20 Non-Residential New Construction $0.10 Residential Alterations $1.16 Non-Residential Alterations $0.35 Residential Demolition $0.35 Non-Residential Demolition $0.10 Roof with tear-off Flat Rate $100

  6. City-Certified FacilitiesTwo Types: Administrative Certification • Inert processors recover at least 90% Full Certification • Mixed C&D facilities recover at least 50%

  7. Certified Facilities • 8 Mixed C&D/Landfills/Transfer • 7 Rock/Asphalt/Quarry • 3 Metal • 2 Carpet • 1 Wood • 1 Reuse

  8. Laying The Groundwork: • Identify The Target • Economics • Stakeholders • Infrastructure

  9. Results of 1998 Waste Characterization StudyComposition of Materials Going to Landfill

  10. Results of 1998 Gate Survey Source of Materials Going to Landfill

  11. Results of 1999 Gate SurveyC&D Materials Going to Landfill • >300,000 tpy • 160,000 tpy buried

  12. Economic Study • Determine costs associated with the handling of C&D materials in and out-of-town • Establish rates based on cost differential for recycling/diversion

  13. Stakeholder Process • Focus Groups • One-on-One • Group Meetings

  14. External: Banking Education Developers Architects Contractors Chamber Labor Haulers Processors Landfills Home Builders Assoc. Internal: City staff Public Works Redevelopment Housing Planning Green Building Stakeholder Process cont. Who was involved?

  15. Stakeholder Process cont. Why Important? • Feedback on system design • ID key support policies, processes, and interests • Navigate the political process for approval by administration

  16. C&D Infrastructure Grants FY 1999/2000 $250,000 FY 2000/2001 $500,000 3 Landfills $333,000 4 Processors $217,000 1 Individual $200,000

  17. C&D Infrastructure Grants February 2001 • $200K Carpet Recovery • $71K Wood Waste Recycling System • $100K Roofing/Wood Recycling System • $129K Organics Removal System January 2000 • $36K “Portable MRF” • $10K C&D Line • $140K Mixed C&D Line • $64K “Rocket” Mixed C&D Line

  18. What Have We Learned? • There are more types of projects than you can shake a 2X4 at! • Sweat the details with the Permit Center / Building Department (and everyone else) • Provide clear written instructions to customers • The other guy’s project makes more waste

  19. www.sjrecycles.org

  20. Program Data Total Project Value $848,712,920 Average $242,559 Median $28,000 High $108,000,000 Low $100

  21. Program Data Total SqFt 9,681,258 Average 2,768 Median 400 High 615,000 Low 1

  22. Program Data Total Deposit Value $2,676,226 Average $766 Median $350 High $58,110 Low $1.05

More Related