1 / 17

Wyner-Ziv Coding of Motion Video

Wyner-Ziv Coding of Motion Video. Overview. Intraframe encoding with Interframe decoding Wyner-Ziv Video Codec Simulation Results. Current video standards Interframe predictive coding for compression Encoder is 5-10 times more complex than decoder. Interframe Encoder. Interframe Decoder.

katima
Download Presentation

Wyner-Ziv Coding of Motion Video

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wyner-Ziv Coding of Motion Video

  2. Overview • Intraframe encoding with Interframe decoding • Wyner-Ziv Video Codec • Simulation Results

  3. Current video standards Interframe predictive coding for compression Encoder is 5-10 times more complex than decoder Interframe Encoder Interframe Decoder Xi Xi’ Standard codec X’i-1 Interframe Video Compression

  4. Xi-1’ Interframe Decoder Intraframe Encoder Xi Xi’ Proposed codec Intraframe Encoding – Interframe Decoding • Dual System • Simpler encoder • Possibly complex decoder Wyner-Ziv Coding Side Information

  5. Slepian-Wolf and Wyner-Ziv Coding • Practical Codes • Coset encoding • [Pradhan and Ramchandran, 1999] • Trellis codes • [Wang and Orchard, 2001] • Turbo codes • [Garcia-Frias and Zhao, 2001], • [Bajcsy and Mitran, 2001] • [Aaron and Girod, 2002] • LDPC codes • [Liveris, Xiong, and Georghiades, 2002] • Practical Applications • [Pradhan and Ramchandran, 2001] • [Liveris, Xiong, and Georghiades, 2002] • [Jagmohan, Sehgal, and Ahuja, 2002]

  6. Even frame Reconstruction X’ X Y Wyner-Ziv Video Codec Interframe Decoder Intraframe Encoder Slepian-Wolf Codec Turbo Decoder Turbo Encoder Scalar Quantizer Buffer Request bits previous Interpolation Odd frames next • Even frames are encoded independently • Odd frames are known as side information at the decoder

  7. Even frame X RCPT-Based Slepian-Wolf Codec Slepian-Wolf Codec Decoded quantized symbols Turbo Decoder Turbo Encoder Scalar Quantizer Buffer Y2i Request bits Y • Uniform scalar quantizer – no coset grouping • RCPT Slepian-Wolf Codec • Flexibility for varying statistics • Embedded puncturing pattern • Bit rate controlled by decoder through feedback

  8. Side Information Y • Interpolation • Average same block from previous and next frame • Motion-compensated interpolation with symmetric motion vectors • Flexibility in design for decoder • Statistics between side information and current frame • Laplacian residual model • Estimate the Laplacian parameter at the decoder previous Interpolation Odd frames next

  9. Reconstruction Function Decoded quantized symbols Reconstruction X’ Y • Limits the magnitude of the reconstruction distortion • Need dithering to avoid contouring • Pixels reconstructed independently

  10. Simulation • Quantizer • 2, 4, 16 levels • Slepian-Wolf codec • Rate 4/5 Turbo code • Embedded puncturing pattern with period 8 • Pe<10-3 ~ 25 pixels per frame • Interpolation • Averaging • MC with symmetric motion vectors (SMV) • Rate-PSNR Comparison with H263+ • Intraframe coding • Interframe coding (B frames) with no motion compensation • Interframe coding (B frames) with motion compensation

  11. 8 dB 2 dB 6 dB Carphone Sequence

  12. 7 dB 4 dB 7 dB Foreman Sequence

  13. Foreman sequence After Wyner-Ziv Coding Side information SMV Interpolation 16-level quantization (~1 bpp)

  14. Sample Frame After Wyner-Ziv Coding Side information SMV Interpolation 16-level quantization (~1 bpp)

  15. Sample Frame After Wyner-Ziv Coding Side information Average Interpolation 16-level quantization (~1 bpp)

  16. Carphone sequence Wyner-Ziv Codec SMV Interpolation 384 kbps H263+ Intraframe Coding 410 kbps

  17. Conclusion • Use Wyner-Ziv coding for practical compression application • Used statistics of the source • New video system • Intraframe encoder – Interframe Decoder • Compared to H263+ • 2 to 7 dB better than Intraframe coding(i-i-i-i) • 5 to 8 dB worse than Interframe coding with MC(i-b-i-b) • Further improvements • Exploit spatial correlation • Acceptable symbol error rate

More Related