Personal rapid transit prt
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 23

Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 96 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Personal Rapid Transit (PRT). Model of the London Vehicle “What we know about PRT Regionally, Statewide, Nationally, & in the UK” by Mukhtar “ Mook -tar” Thakur Director, Multi-Modal Innovation Office at Mn /DOT - ACEC Annual Conference March, 2010. In the Metro Region.

Download Presentation

Personal Rapid Transit (PRT)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Personal Rapid Transit (PRT)


Model of the London Vehicle

“What we know about PRT Regionally, Statewide,

Nationally, & in the UK”

by Mukhtar “Mook-tar” Thakur

Director, Multi-Modal Innovation Office

at Mn/DOT - ACEC Annual Conference

March, 2010


In the Metro Region

  • City of Bloomington has had discussions/ presentations from three different PRT related groups.

  • Maple Grove is said to have discussions about developing the parcel near the Gravel Pit with a crossing over 694.

  • Mn/DOT has heard of or seen printed sketches of proposals for:

  • Ford Plant Site – connections to Hiawatha Light Rail Station

  • Edina

  • Richfield(in combination)

  • Bloomington


PRT = Personal Rapid Transitat London Airport


Statewide

City of Winona is interested in pursuing a PRT demonstration project:

  • Winona has submitted for a Federal (PRT) grant

  • A sketch shows crossing of TH 61

  • The City Council is supportive

  • Mn/DOT has issued letter of support for their Grant

    Application


Nationally

City of San Jose, CA is exploring PRT at their airport.

  • RFI issued October 2008 – 19 responses received; and

  • RFP issued for ~$4M study – ongoing.

    City of Santa Cruz, CA

  • October 2008 issued an RFQ for a PRT System –

    .

    Alameda, CA - Developer Proposal

    Peter Calthorpe of Calthorpe Associates

    -


Nationally (New Jersey continued)

New Jersey State Had a Legislative Study Performed

February 2007 Report stated:

  • PRT Systems are approaching but not yet ready for deployment.

  • Many of the technical components needed to support PRT systems are commercially available and are used in other industries.

  • Global PRT interest and development programs are expanding.

  • A fully operational PRT system is needed to demonstrate the theoretical benefits of PRT and establish commercial readiness.


Nationally (New Jersey continued)

  • A comprehensive technology research and demonstration program is needed to develop a PRT system.

  • Construction of PRT underway in two locations.

  • Several other cities in the world seriously considering the development of PRT systems.

  • Many challenges that face PRT in terms of large scale deployment such as:

  • technological limitations

  • a very small number of manufacturers worldwide

  • proprietary system components that limit open competition and sustainability


Nationally (New Jersey continued)

  • Any application of PRT in the commonwealth would likely require additional research, development and funding to ensure that the system is sustainable long enough to achieve a return on the investment.

    Skyweb Express Vehicle


Nationally (continued)

Virginia Finds PRT Viable

Report to Virginia legislature, December 2008, noted:

  • Construction of PRT underway in two locations (London & Abu Dhabi);

  • Several other cities seriously considering development of PRT systems; and

  • Appears that technology is evolving from concept to reality.


Nationally (Virginia continued)

  • Many challenges to implementation of large sale systems:

  • Technological limitations;

  • Small number of manufacturers worldwide;

  • Proprietary System Components that limit competition & sustainability;

  • Any application in Virginia would likely require additional research, development and funding; and

  • Proposal was Portsmouth be considered as one potential for a pilot program.


Nationally (continued)Shoreline Biz Park/Google/Mountain View Downtown/NASA

  • Research Pk PRT –first version June 2008

    –last update September 2009

    Ithaca, NY Study

  • Awarded in 2009

  • 12 stations, 7.7 miles of Guideway, Lawnet Cornell University & Ithaca College,


In the UK

  • PRT “demoline” start date is this Spring at London’s

    Heathrow Airport.

  • Connects two Park & Ride

    locations to Terminal 5

    approx. 1 mile away

  • Costs stated to be approx.

    $40M

  • Start date has been delayed

    at least twice, now stated

    to be Spring, 2010 London’s Heathrow Airport

    Terminal 5 Station


  • Stations are like bus stops. Destination selected by Smart Card and touch screen. (Smart Card keeps info on passengers for personalized service.)

Stop at London Park and Ride

  • For typical 1 mile journey approximately 3 minutes.

  • Expected to be very reliable.

Stop at London Park and Ride

  • Pods run either at ground level or elevated guideways supported by lightweight steel structures.


In the UK (continued)

  • In the UK these points were noted about PRT:

  • Less disruption to ongoing operations at Heathrow;

  • Faster construction due to smaller scale;

  • Scalability;

  • Opportunity to extend to Airport Environment and other terminals; and

  • Low Emissions.


In the UK (continued)

  • Obstructions on guideway will automatically stop the pod and alert Central Control.

  • Emission factor saving 3-4 times over cars orpublic transport. Reduces carbon emissions now.

  • Vandalism Resistant.

  • It could run on solar power.

Guideway Leading to the PRT Stop at London


Mn/DOT Update on Personal Rapid Transit (PRT)

  • Request for Interest (RFI) published in State Register of February 08, 2010,

    download from: www.dot.state.mn.us/transit/

    deadline for responding is May 4, 2010

  • Hoping for at least 5 and as many as 10 responders

  • Creation of a Personal Rapid Transit Alliance (PRTA) group is one goal of the RFI

  • Seeking to explore and gather interest about PRT is also a goal of the RFI

  • Next Steps are TBD


Mn/DOT Update on Personal RapidTransit (continued)

Thus far we have noted the following:

  • Don’t view PRT as being in competition with line-haul bus or LRT services.

  • That PRT may be competitive with feeder/shuttle buses in niche applications.

  • Don’t see PRT being implemented as a “network” around the city.

  • That there are issues that need to be addressed when trying to establish the feasibility of a PRT application, namely: aesthetics, how it fits in the current land form and surrounding land uses, ROW, and how it is going to be funded, among others.


Concept Showing Skyweb Express Vehicles Passing a Station

A Vectus Vehicle on the Test Trackin Uppsala, Sweden

London Heathrow PRT

London Heathrow Guideway


QUESTIONS?


MISTER Prototype on Displayin Opole, Poland


Model of the Masdar Vehicle


A JPOD Vehicle Option


  • Login