1 / 9

MA DG Collaborative – Year 1

MA DG Collaborative – Year 1. Tim Roughan Director of Distributed Resources Timothy.Roughan@us.ngrid.com June 17, 2005 Restructuring Roundtable. Background. Different interconnection polices among the four MA utilities Perception that customers not getting assumed benefits of DG

kass
Download Presentation

MA DG Collaborative – Year 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MA DG Collaborative – Year 1 Tim Roughan Director of Distributed Resources Timothy.Roughan@us.ngrid.com June 17, 2005 Restructuring Roundtable

  2. Background • Different interconnection polices among the four MA utilities • Perception that customers not getting assumed benefits of DG • MA DTE issued 02-38 order in 2002 • Authorized DG collaborative to standardize interconnection process • DTE approved statewide interim standard April 2004 • Authorized two year collaborative • Further enhance interconnection policy • Review DG and distribution planning • Additional work regarding network interconnections • Meter ownership

  3. Year 1 report 5/31/05 • New interconnection process is working well • 144 (18.5 MWs) applications from 4/1/04 to 3/31/05 • In MECo 13 requests 2003, 32 in 2004 • NStar had 62% of all requests • Extensive tracking of projects • Tracking timelines and costs • Have suggested some process changes to interconnection tariff • If the ISO has to study a project, timelines may be extended • Requirement for wiring inspection • P1547 is now IEEE Standard 1547-2003

  4. Year 1 report 5/31/05 • Network system interconnection • Multiple primary sources feeding one or more customers • Issue arose whether you can delay protective functions to allow DG breaker to trip, however MA Utilities will not delay network protectors because it violates basic protection strategies • Need to find another solution • Meter ownership • QFs already can own their meter • QFs under PURPA • Which policy can they use?

  5. Year 1 report 5/31/05 • DG and Distribution Planning • Distribution Planning reviews • MECo: 1,115 feeders, 295 substations • NSTAR: 1,300 feeders, 300 substations • WMECo: 271 feeders; 43 substations • FG&E: 44 feeders; 17 substations • Total: 2,730 feeders; 655 substations • Approximate allocation of capital budgets • Asset Replacement: 25-40% • Reliability: 25-35% • Capacity: 30-45% • To make the budget, projects typically have to resolve 2 or more of the above issues

  6. Year 1 report 5/31/05 • Beginning to work through some ‘paper’ pilots to determine value and costs of DG installations in certain areas • Value to DG customer is reduced energy costs, which is a cost to the utility • Value from the utility is typically only from deferral for capacity projects in low-growth areas • Unless real sustained capacity is realized non-DG ratepayers likely will not benefit from DG installations • This may involve utility control of the DG • Or, enough DG to use diversity on a feeder by feeder basis • Could result in cross-subsidization by non-DG customers

  7. Year 2 work plan • Any additional streamlining of tariff • Look at new FERC small gen process and how the ISO-NE will implement • Additional investigation of interconnecting to network systems • Are there other cost-effective solutions besides violating basic fault protection practices? • Continue working through the costs and benefits to all parties for DG on the distribution system

  8. Year 2 work plan • Utility Congestion Relief Pilot (UCRP) • MTC is interested in testing DG value • Looking to work within MECo’s Lowell area targeted load response project • MECo pays 50¢/kWh for load shed, plus $3/kW for summer months as a retainer • Must be customer > 200 kWs • Other possibilities being discussed for smaller customers including residential • MTC interested in projects with other utilities

  9. Summary • A lot more time required than was assumed • This is not a simple issue, and it takes time to do it right • Need involvement from real customers • Need perspective of people who are not in the industry • New FERC rules will affect us • LICAP: demand response customers can earn back their LICAP contribution • Small Generator rule: how will this interact? • Comments due 6/23 to MA DTE on report • http://www.mtpc.org/renewableenergy/public_policy/DG/2005_annualreport.htm

More Related