- 114 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Diffractive deep inelastic scattering

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Diffractive deep inelastic scattering

Cyrille MarquetRIKEN BNL Research Center

- Inclusive deep inelastic scattering (DIS): e h e Xthe structure functionsF2, FT and FL
Diffractive deep inelastic scattering

- Inclusive Diffraction: e h e X h
the structure functionsF2D, FTDand FLD

- Exclusive vector meson production: e h e h, e h e J/ hDeeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS): e h e h momentum transfer and impact parameter
- Diffactive jet production

lh center-of-mass energyS = (l+P)2*h center-of-mass energyW2 = (l-l’+P)2photon virtualityQ2 = - (l-l’)2 > 0

transverse size

resolution 1/Q

P

hadron

x ~ momentum fraction of the struck partony~ W²/S

FTand FL correspond to the scattering of a transversely (T) or longitudinally (L) polarized virtual photon off the hadron

experimental data are often shown in terms of

measurements performed

at the HERA collider by the

H1 and ZEUS collaborations

over a broad kinematic range

at moderate x: bjorken scaling F2(x)

scaling violations: evidence for gluons

about 15 % of the events are diffractive

When plotting the same cross-section

as a function of the variable Q² x

one obtains a scaling curve:

Stasto, Golec-Biernat and Kwiecinski (2001)

x < 10-2

with Q0 1 GeV and 0.3

this scaling is called geometric scaling

it identifies an intrinsic scale of the proton

which rises as x decreases: Q0x-/2

Can we understand that scale/scaling from QCD?

It should also have consequences in diffraction

Inclusive diffraction

momentum transfert = (P-P’)2 < 0diffractive mass of the final stateMX2 = (P-P’+l-l’)2

P

hadron

P

when the hadron remains intact

~ momentum fraction of the struck parton with respect to the Pomeron

xpom = x/

rapidity gap : = ln(1/xpom)

xpom~ momentum fraction of the Pomeron with respect to the hadron

experimental data are often shown in terms of

in terms of photon-hadron diffractive cross-section:

Diffractive DIS without proton tagging e p e X Y with MY cut

H1LRG data MY < 1.6 GeV

ZEUSFPC data MY < 2.3 GeV

Diffractive DIS with proton tagging e p e X p

H1FPS data

ZEUSLPS data

measurements performed

at the HERA collider by the

H1 and ZEUS collaborations

over a broad kinematic range

perturbative

- perturbative evolution of with Q2 :

Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi

in the limit Q² withx fixed

- For inclusive DIS

a = quarks, gluons

not valid if x is too small

non perturbative

for instance at the Tevatron:

predictions obtained with diffractive pdfs overestimate CDF data by a factor of about 10

a very popular approach:

use collinear factorization anyway, and apply a correction factor called the rapidity gap survival probability

collinear factorization for F2Dsimilar with diffractive parton densities

but: you cannot do much with the diffractive pdfs

factorization does not hold for

diffractive jet production at low Q² diffractive jet production in pp collisions

factorization also holds for

diffractive jet production at high Q²

k’

k

r : dipole size

p

in diffraction:

at large Nc, 1 dipole emitting N-1 gluons = N dipoles

valid in the small-x limit

p

p’

elas: involves the quark-antiquark final state, dominant for small diffractive mass (large )

same object for inclusiveand diffractive cross-section

dissoc: involves higher order final states: qqg, …dominant for large diffractive mass (small )

can also be expressed in the dipole picture

Contributions of the different final states to the diffractive cross-section:

at small : quark-antiquark-gluon

at intermediate : quark-antiquark (T)

at large : quark-antiquark (L)

large measurements FLD

FLD is higher twist:

it cannot be predicted from pdfs

x < 10-2

0.3

geometric scaling can be easily understood as a consequence of large parton densities

what does the proton look like in (Q², x) plane:

lines parallel to the saturation line

are lines of constant densities

along which scattering is constant

At fixed , the scaling variable should be

C.M. and L. Schoeffel (2006)

0.3

consistent with the HERA data

diffractive cross-section in bins of

xpom < 10-2

MX=30 GeV

MX=20 GeV

MX=11 GeV

MX=6 GeV

MX=3 GeV

MX=1.2 GeV

CGC = saturation model

Iancu, Itakura and Munier (2003)

Forshaw and Shaw have not been able to find a good fit without saturation effects

saturation naturally explains the constant ratio

Exclusive vector meson productionandDeeply virtual Compton scattering

in the dipole picture:

with the overlap function:

sensitive to instead of

access to impact parameter

measurements:

lots of data from HERA (especially J/Psi)

- collinear factorization with generalized parton densities

- determination of the t slope:

S. Munier, A. Stasto and A. Mueller (2001)

the S-matrix (S=1-T ) is extracted from the data

yellow band: cannot be trusted, too sensitive

to large t region where there is no data

S(1/r 1Gev, b 0, x 5.10-4) 0.6 HERA is entering the saturation regime

H. Kowalski and D. Teaney (2003)

E. Gotsman, E. Levin, M. Lublinsky,U. Maor and E. Naftali (2003)

t integrated cross-sections

d/dt cross-sections

C.M., R. Peschanski and G. Soyez (2005)

saturation scale

form factor

with B = const

need data at fixed t for

different values of x and Q²

Diffractive tri-jet production

model

independent

model

dependent

model

independent

1/k²

k²

k

0

k0

C.M. and K. Golec-Biernat (2005)

final state configuration: tri-jet + gap + proton

k0: typical unitarization scale

idea: measure the transverse momentum

spectrum of the gluon jet

k

the gluon jet is the most forward in the proton direction

other configurations are suppressed by ln(1/ )

k : gluon transverse momentum

- observable strongly
sensitive to unitarity effects

kmax/QS = independent of Q², QS

1.5

Can we experimentally test this? extract QS?

important limitation: at HERA QS< 1 Gev and k > 3 Gev one does not have access to the whole bump

marked bump for k = kmax

Predictions of the GBW model with

and the parameters andx0

taken from the F2 fits:

- = 0.288 andx0 = 3.10-4
for full lines (no charm)

= 0.277 andx0 = 4.10-5

for dashed lines (charm included)

need points in different bins

ZEUS did measure 4 points for

- Inclusive diffractionmeasure FLD
- Exclusive vector meson production/DVCSmeasurements in different t bins with large Q² and x ranges
- Diffractive tri-jet productionpotential to bring evidence for saturation?