1 / 18

Scientific support to energy security in the Baltic Sea Region Vilnius , 04.07.2013

Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation. Scientific support to energy security in the Baltic Sea Region Vilnius , 04.07.2013. General principles. General principles of international law

kasen
Download Presentation

Scientific support to energy security in the Baltic Sea Region Vilnius , 04.07.2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jerzy JendrośkaEnergy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support to energy security in the Baltic Sea Region Vilnius, 04.07.2013 Jerzy Jendrośka

  2. General principles • General principles of international law • Trail Smelter case - arbitration tribunal • Nagymaros-Gabcikovo case - ICJ • Rio Declarationon Environment and Development • general responsibility for transboundary environmental damage - Principle 2 • two secondary principles (18 and 19) Jerzy Jendrośka

  3. Rio Declaration - Principle 2 • States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. Jerzy Jendrośka

  4. Rio Principles • Principle 4 • In order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it. • Principle 17 • Environmental impact assessment, as a national instrument, shall be undertaken for proposed activities that are likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment and are subject to a decision of a competent national authority. Jerzy Jendrośka

  5. Principle 10 • Environmental issues are best handled with the participation of all concerned citizens, at the relevant level. At the national level, each individual shall have appropriate access to information concerning the environment that is held by public authorities, including information on hazardous materials and activities in their communities, and the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes. States shall facilitate and encourage public awareness and participation by making information widely available. Effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings,including redress and remedy, shall be provided. Jerzy Jendrośka

  6. Principle 18 • States shall immediately notify other States of any natural disasters or other emergencies that are likely to produce sudden harmful effects on the environment of those States. Every effort shall be made by the international community to help States so afflicted. Jerzy Jendrośka

  7. Principle 19 • States shall provide prior and timely notification and relevant information to potentially affected States on activities that may have a significant adverse transboundary environmental effect and shall consult with those States at an early stage and in good faith. Jerzy Jendrośka

  8. Substantivevsproceduralobligations • Substantive obligations • avoiding/minimising harm • compensating damage • Procedural obligations • notification • transboundary procedure Jerzy Jendrośka

  9. Relevent international instruments • Multilateralagreements • concerningsharednaturalresources • concerningtransboundaryimpact • Bilateralagreements • general co-operation in environmentalprotection • concerningsharednaturalresources • concerningtransboundaryimpact Jerzy Jendrośka

  10. Transboundaryprocedure in law • International law • EspooConvention • SEA Protocol • IndustrialAccidentsConvention • EU law • EIA Directive • SEA Directive • IPPC/IED Directive • Seveso II Directive Jerzy Jendrośka

  11. EspooConvention • Adopted and signed in Espoo in 1991 • entered into force 10 September 1997 • status: 45 Parties (including EU) • First amendment - MOP II • definition of the public • open to non-UNECE countries • Second amendment - MOP III • scoping • extended list of activities on Appedix I • review of compliance Jerzy Jendrośka

  12. Obligations • Party of origin • notification • provision of EIA documentation • transboundary procedure • consultations • provision of final decision • Affected Party • provision of information if requested • Both concerned Parties • public participation in affected party Jerzy Jendrośka

  13. UNECE Aarhus Convention • Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in EnvironmentalMatters • 1998 - adopted and signed in Aarhus (Denmark) • 2001 - entry into force • 2003 - PRTR Protocol adopted and signed inKiev • 2005 - GMO Amendment adopted and signed inAlmaty (Kazakhstan) Opole University

  14. 3 pillars Access to information passive disclosure – Art. 4 active disclosure – Art. 5 Public participation decisions whether to permit specific activities „which may have a significant effect on the environment” - art 6 GMO decisions – Art. 6 bis plans/programs „relating to environment”– Art. 7 policies „relating to environment” – Art. 7 normative acts/legally binding rules „that may have a significant effect on the environment” – Art. 8 Access to justice reddress in case of abusing right to information - art.9.1 reddress in case of abusing right to participate - art.9.2 separate right to file a public interest law suit - art.9.3 14 Opole University

  15. Aarhus Convention – status and role in Europe • AarhusConvention as a benchmark • AarhusConvention in EU • part of the acquis • MemberStatesimplementAarhus via EU law • EuropeanCommission and ECJ as enforcers Opole University

  16. Public participation • Public • national • from affected Party (from areaslikely to be affected) • equivalentopportunities (Art.2.6) • Joint responsibility of Partiesconcerned! • Possibility to submitcomments (Art.4.2) • directly to the competent authority in the Party of origin • through the Party of origin (for example via Point of Contacts) Jerzy Jendrośka

  17. Public participation II • Comments • concerningproposedactivity • concerning EIA documentation • ‘anycomments” according to Aarhus • Public participationatvariousstages • Public to be informedabout the finaldecision and possibilities to appeal (ECE/MP.EIA/8) Jerzy Jendrośka

  18. Vienna lawof the Treaties (I) • Art.26 -Pacta sunt servanda • „Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.” Jerzy Jendrośka

More Related