1 / 26

Controlling Unemployment Taxes

Controlling Unemployment Taxes. Presented by Unemployment Insurance Services www.unemployment-services.com. Understanding the System. Origins Created by FDR as part of the New Deal Created to provide temporary relief to individuals unemployed through no fault of their own

Download Presentation

Controlling Unemployment Taxes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Controlling Unemployment Taxes Presented by Unemployment Insurance Services www.unemployment-services.com

  2. Understanding the System • Origins • Created by FDR as part of the New Deal • Created to provide temporary relief to individuals unemployed through no fault of their own • Completely funded by the employers of the state through payroll taxes or reimbursable payments • It is not a welfare or entitlement program

  3. How Does the System Work • The claimant has a twelve month period in which to claim up to 20 weeks of benefits in MO and 26 weeks in KS. • The liability and the interested employers are determined by the base period. • The base period is the determined by excluding the current quarter and the most recently completed quarter. • The previous four quarters make up the base period.

  4. Benefits & Determinations • The claimant can collect a maximum of 20-26 weeks of benefits during the life of their claim. • Maximum liability is $6,400 in MO and $12,194 in KS • In cases of resignations, the claimant has the burden to show they resigned for good cause attributable to the employer. • In discharges, the employer has the burden of showing misconduct • Misconduct is defined as a “willful or deliberate violation of duty or responsibility reasonably owed the employer”

  5. How does the Employer get Charged • Each employer maintains a UI account • In Missouri in lieu of a tax rate, the employer agrees to “reimburse” the trust fund dollar for dollar to former employees who collect UI benefits. • In Kansas, the employer is charged a tax rate on the total annual payroll based on a ratio of annual benefit charges to the two year average payroll. This is referred to as being governmental rated. • Substantial savings can be achieved through proper claim management.

  6. Changes to Law in Kansas • HB 2105 – Effective 7/1/13 • Eliminated severance pay exemption • Narrow the definition of “good cause” when an employee resigns • Greatly broadened “misconduct” in employer’s favor • Changes in attendance • Changes in drug testing • Changes in proving misconduct for performance issues

  7. Attendance in Kansas • No longer necessary to have a written policy – Only must show that an expectation exists • Employers no longer must give the employee a written warning to prove misconduct • Burden is placed on the claimant to show “good cause” for being absent • If claimant is alleging health as the “good cause” they must provide medical proof.

  8. Drug testing in Kansas • Standards loosened to now include “reasonable suspicion” as opposed to “probable cause” • Allows for disqualifications in a “zero tolerance policy” • Adds test tampering as possible misconduct • Elevates a drug or alcohol offense to gross misconduct

  9. Missouri Philosophical Changes • Much more difficult environment for employers • Heavily influenced by current political climate • Labor friendly appeal referees • Emphasis is on proving that the actions were “willful and/or deliberate” and that the claimant’s actions were intentional • Very difficult to prove misconduct in “isolated instances”

  10. “He with the best story…” • Protesting the UI claim • Identify the issue • Resignation or Discharge • Burden of proof • Use the letter of protest as a road map • Support the protest • Policies • Written Warnings • Witness Statements/other documentation • Misconduct is the goal, not justification of discharge

  11. “I Quit my job because..” • The employee has the burden of proving good cause that was attributable to the employer • Claimant must show that they made every attempt to preserve the employment • Good cause can be one of the following: • Hostile work environment • Discrimination or harassment • Change in the hiring agreement • Good cause is not: • General dissatisfaction with the employment • Disagreement over disciplinary actions • Transfer of work site or change in job description if notified at time of hire that employer reserves the right to make adjustments

  12. Things to Remember about Resignations • Get a letter of resignation whenever possible • Allow the employee to fulfill their notice period • Always document issues that might be in dispute • If you can not obtain a written resignation, send the claimant a certified letter • “Constructive discharges” are NOT resignations

  13. We accepted his resignation and told him to stay home • If you let him go early, the claimant will be eligible for the difference between the last day of their notice period and their actual last date they worked • Let the employee complete their notice period • The employee can be re-assigned • The employee is obligated to follow your policies during this period • Do not stop the documentation process

  14. Difatta-Wheaton v. Dolphin Capital • Missouri Supreme Court decision • Holds that an employee who is released due to their inability to return to work from health related issues will be considered discharges. • Employers will be forced to prove misconduct connected to the employment. • Hold the job for as long as possible

  15. Attendance in Kansas • Written attendance policy is no longer required (but strongly suggested) • Employer only must show that they had a known expectation and was consistently applied • Written warnings are no longer required. Proof of reprimand will reinforce position • Claimant must show that if the issues were health related they were under the care of a doctor

  16. Attendance in Missouri • The statute: Infractions of an employer’s attendance policy can be misconduct, if the employer can show that the claimant had instances of attendance that were avoidable and/or improperly reported. • The claimant needs to have knowledge of a written attendance policy • Written warnings enhance the ability to prove misconduct • Emphasis will be placed on the FINAL instance of absenteeism or tardiness • If final incident is not disqualifying, the state will seek a pattern of avoidable and/or improperly reported instances • Extremely important to document reasons for absences or tardiness. Include time of call to establish if instance was properly reported. • One instance of failure to properly report the incident or if the instance was avoidable, misconduct can be established.

  17. How to beat the Attendance Statute in Missouri • Do not focus on number of absences • Get supervisors to document reasons and times of the instances • Reprimand the employee for failure to properly report the incident of absenteeism or tardiness • “Failure to report” removes the good cause issue • By focusing on reporting issues, you focus on a black and white issue

  18. Drug Testing • Misconduct can be the use or impairment caused by alcoholic beverage or a non-prescribed controlled substance • Has to be conducted by a certified lab • Can be urine, blood, saliva, or breath test • Must show a chain of custody approved by certification • Sample must be collected by a licensed health care professional • The test can be conducted if there is probable cause • Can be requested or required if the employee is notified at the time of hire that it is a condition of employment • Random testing, if mandated by law • Post-accident testing • Testing required by a Employee Assistance Program

  19. Defining Misconduct in Today’s Environment • Emphasis is on proving “intent” • No longer enough to show a violation of policy • Documentation must reflect a “intentional or deliberate disregard for employer’s interests • Buzzwords are “intentionally” and/or “willfully”

  20. Documenting Other Employee Deficiencies • Select issues that you can prove • Show that the claimant was aware of his responsibility • The claimant has shown the ability to perform the task in the past • Be specific: What was expected, what they failed to do correctly and how they can improve • Whenever possible use your policies or job descriptions

  21. Protesting issues of performance • Show a progression of discipline/coaching • The employee was aware of their responsibility • The employee has performed his tasks correctly and timely in the past • The protest is not a justification of discharge • Avoid the implication that the employee was “unable” to perform the work • If possible be patient. Must prove the acts were intentional and willful

  22. The Effects of a Good Written Warning • Provides detail for the examiner • The claimant was aware of company expectation • The claimant was receiving clear instructions • Most importantly, shows that the claimant had control over the events • Helps to establish “intent” • Gives the employee the opportunity to improve upon their deficiencies

  23. Issues of “Gross Misconduct” • Gross misconduct is defined as behavior or actions that that warrant immediate discharge • Includes insubordination, theft, workplace violence, and harassment • Documentation is crucial • One chance to prove misconduct • Witness statements • First hand information essential

  24. “You can’t handle the truth!” • The unemployment hearing process • Conducted by an Unemployment Law Judge • Both parties have the right to confront each other • First hand testimony is absolutely essential • Documentation is required to support testimony • Rules of testimony and evidence are enforced • Prepare for the hearing • Determine the issue • Decide who should testify • Make a timeline • Discuss the hearing beforehand

More Related