1 / 61

The First Words are the Hardest

The First Words are the Hardest. Strategies for successful manuscript development. Gavin Leslie Andrea Marshall. Why write for publication?. To communicate information Expand the literature Contribute to nursing as a profession Intrinsic factors. Developing the paper. The idea

karlyn
Download Presentation

The First Words are the Hardest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The First Words are the Hardest Strategies for successful manuscript development Gavin Leslie Andrea Marshall

  2. Why write for publication? • To communicate information • Expand the literature • Contribute to nursing as a profession • Intrinsic factors

  3. Developing the paper • The idea • Write about something you know • Consider • What am I writing about? • Who am I writing for? • Why am I telling them this? • Focus/slant • Timing

  4. Developing the paper • The writing team • Who do you work with? • Authorship guidelines • NHMRC • ICMJE

  5. ICMJE author guidelines • Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data • Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content • Final approval of the version to be published *Authors should meet conditions 1, 2 AND 3

  6. Developing the paper • Type of paper • Original research • Literature review • Traditional • Systematic • Meta-analysis • Case study • Book report • Letter to the editor

  7. Developing the paper • The journal • Impact factor • Publication lag • Accessibility • Review editions of the journal in question • Scope of the journal • What do they publish? • Author guidelines

  8. Developing the paper • Searching the literature • CINAHL • Medline/PubMed • Embase • Google Scholar • Reference lists • Identifying key works – MeSH terms

  9. Organising the manuscript • Organising the literature • Bibliographic software • Overall structure and flow of the paper • Building your argument • Leading to the “take home message”

  10. Understanding scientific writing I didn’t look up the original reference “It has long been known ...” “Typical results are shown ...” This is the prettiest graph “A definite trend is evident ...” These data are practically meaningless

  11. Understanding scientific writing “In my experience …” once “In case after case …” twice “In a series of cases …” thrice

  12. Writing tips - language • Sentence fragments Enabling them to conduct the research in the ICU. This enabled them to conduct the research in the ICU.

  13. Preparing and Focussing Author Orientation Allocating author prominence … Choice of style is influenced by: • the degree of importance attached to the author (“guru”) • the conventions of the discipline • the conventions of the reference style • for variety in writing

  14. Preparing and Focussing “Strong” Author Orientation • primary focus on what the authors / researchers did or said • author takes prominent position in the sentence

  15. Preparing and Focussing “Strong” Author Orientation Example: Elliott (1997) stated that a comparison of previous ICU costing studies was problematic because of varying study methodologies.

  16. Preparing and Focussing “Weak” Author Orientation • information is still presented as the author doing it or writing about it • author details are not placed in the grammatical structure of the sentence • ‘someone has said this is fact’; or this is some controversy

  17. Preparing and Focussing “Weak” Author Orientation Example: A comparison of previous ICU costing studies was shown to be problematic because of varying study methodologies (Elliott, 1997).

  18. Preparing and Focussing “No” Author Orientation • information is presented as fact, with author details outside the grammatical structure of the sentence

  19. Preparing and Focussing “No” Author Orientation Example: A comparison of previous ICU costing studies was problematic because of varying study methodologies (Elliott, 1997).

  20. Writing tips – Two-Part construction They said they could complete the research, although they warned it would take some time. OR They said they could complete the research, they warned it would take some time.

  21. Writing tips – Two-Part construction • Whereas obtaining spare parts for a new ventilator is much easier. • Whether they operate on the patient today or tomorrow.

  22. Writing tips – relative pronouns • Which study do you mean? • Which she studied as well.

  23. Writing tips – sentence structure • Nurses need to provide a safe environment, this only occurs when the required knowledge, skills and attitudes are developed in individuals. • Nurses need to provide a safe environment, however this only occurs when the required knowledge, skills and attitudes are developed in individuals.

  24. Writing tips – subject verb agreement • Verb must agree with its subject • The patients in this intensive care unit are too critically ill to be moved. • The installation of high speed internet access in the ICU has made finding resources much faster.

  25. Writing tips - tenses • First, decide whether you need to be writing in the past (recommended), present, or future • Stay consistent within the sentence AND the document

  26. Writing tips - apostrophes • Contractions in academic writing • Words ending with s, x, and z • Don’t use s’s • Do use x’s and z’s

  27. Eats, shoots and leaves

  28. Writing tips - punctuation

  29. Writing tips – topic sentences • Play three crucial roles • Introduces a controlling idea • Links the controlling idea clearly to a preceding idea in the text • Orients the reader to the content in the paragraph

  30. Writing tips – structuring paragraphs • How to control the ideas contained in the topic sentence • Paragraphs can • Describe • Exemplify • Analyse • Challenge • Persuade • Use supporting evidence

  31. Writing tips – writing persuasively • Argue a case and present your case persuasively to support your position • Descriptive – lists information without showing relationships. No interpretation • Analytical – shows relationships between concepts but no position stated • Persuasive analytical – shows relationships, states a position and argues it its support

  32. Writing tips – writing cohesively • A clear flow of ideas that enables the reader to move smoothly through your text • Need to clearly connect ideas to those which precede and follow it • Confused readers will give up • Reviewers will reject!

  33. Tables and figures • Must be referred to in-text • Must be referred to prior to the in-text reference • Must appear as soon as practically possible and take less than a page in space • Only discuss the relevant data in the table / figure. Its meant to tell a 1,000 words • Often requested to be submitted at the end of the text or as separate files

  34. Preparing and Focussing Summary Tables • Initial review of papers • Select column headers and develop table (sections or themes) • Critique articles in sections or themes • Questions / gaps identified in reading

  35. Summary Tables

  36. Writing tips – introductions and conclusions • Introduction – orients the reader to the scope of the paper. The reader should have a good idea what to expect and be compelled to continue reading. The last sentence should clearly convey the intent of the article. • Conclusion – a summing up of the main points. It should concisely convey your overall view.

  37. Getting Past the First Hurdle - Abstract Preparation • Abstracts are critical • Used to determine acceptance / rejection of presentations / posters • Only published record • Often accessed more widely • Used by reader to judge value of contents

  38. Getting Past the First Hurdle - Abstract Preparation • Abstract preparation - • Do the paper first • Then summarise the content • 4 part rule • introduction (aim) • methods • results • Conclusions / recommendations

  39. Abstract Preparation • Introduction • 2 to 3 sentences which summarise the background / rationale • Links to the aim of the study project • Ends with the aim of the study or project • This maybe under a separate subheading

  40. Abstract Preparation - Introduction Enteral tubes are frequently used in the critically ill patient for feeding and gastric decompensation. Although enteral feeding is beneficial for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, as with most healthcare interventions, there are risks and potential adverse events associated with administration devices and nutrition delivery. Nursing standards, policies and procedures have been established to facilitate the care of ICU patients with enteral feeding tubes and minimise the risk of complications. Many of these standards, policies and protocols have not been based on current research, but on ritual and opinion. Using a computerised literature search and an evidence-based classification system as described by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), a comprehensive systematicreview was undertaken of enteral tube management to guide the development of clinical guidelines policies and procedures.

  41. Abstract Preparation - Introduction Enteral tubes are frequently used in the critically ill patient for feeding and gastric decompensation. Although enteral feeding is beneficial for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, there are risks and potential adverse events associated with administration devices and nutrition delivery. Using a computerised literature search and an evidence-based classification system as described by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), a systematicreview was undertaken of enteral tube management to guide the development of clinical guidelines policies and procedures.

  42. Abstract Preparation – Introduction (aim) Enteral tubes are frequently used in the critically ill patient for feeding and gastric decompensation. Although enteral feeding is beneficial for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, there are risks and potential adverse events associated with administration devices and nutrition delivery. Using a computerised literature search and an evidence-based classification system as described by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), a systematic review was undertaken of enteral tube management to guide the development of clinical guidelines policies and procedures.

  43. Abstract Preparation – Methods • Explains how the project was done. Using a computerised literature search and an evidence-based classification system as described by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), a comprehensive review was undertaken of enteral tube management.

  44. Abstract Preparation – Methods Using a computerised literature search and an evidence-based classification system as described by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), a systematic review using the method described by the Cochrane Collaboration was undertaken of enteral tube management. An OVID search of Medline and CINHAL limited to 1983 and English using keywords, gastric tubes, nasogastric tubes, enteral tubes / feeding / placement was carried out. All reference list from relevant articles were cross checked.

  45. Abstract Preparation – Results • Report what has been found and any related statistical data/information. • Keep it brief, limit to major findings.

  46. Abstract Preparation – Results Safety issues include verification of enteral tube positioning to minimise the risk of aspiration. The “gold standard” is anAs compared to an abdominal x-ray. Bedside methods to verify enteral tube position have all been reported as unreliable indicators of placement and have been associated with an increased risk of aspiration. Despite few randomised controlled trials being conducted into the management of gastric residual volumes,Although studies are limited, current research supports continuing of feeding if aspiration volumes are not excessive. Feeding is often withheld more than is necessary due to perceived excessive gastric residual volumes.Randomised trials support the use of prokinetics to aid in gastric emptying. The frequency of checking gastric residual volumes varies greatly and is based on opinion.Other supported practicesfindings included use of the semi recumbent position, maintaining adequate airway cuff pressure and minimising the contamination of feeds and equipment through meticulous handling, continuous rather than intermittent feeding and closed rather than open feeding systems.

  47. Abstract Preparation – Results Thirty nine articles were retrieved including 8 randomised control trials and 31 quasi experimental studies. Safety issues include enteral tube positioning to minimise the risk of aspiration. As compared to an abdominal x-ray. Bedside methods to verify enteral tube position have all been reported as unreliable indicators of placement. Although studies are limited, current research supports continuing of feeding if aspiration volumes are not excessive. The frequency of checking gastric residual volumes varies greatly and is based on opinion. Randomised trials support the use of prokinetics to aid in gastric emptying. Other supported practices included use of the semi recumbent position, maintaining adequate airway cuff pressure and minimising the contamination of feeds and equipment through meticulous handling, continuous rather than intermittent feeding and closed rather than open feeding systems.

  48. Abstract Preparation – Conclusions / recommendations • Short sentence or two pulling together main outcomes. • Keep it focused on your findings, don’t get too carried away. • Don’t say will be reported, will be discussed in greater depth, is covered in the article/paper.

More Related