DCMF
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 7

DCMF PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 50 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

DCMF. WSB Update EDCM Consultation Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair. EDCM Consultation. EDCM Consultation workshop: Held 13 th January at ELEXON. 65 attendees. EDCM Consultation: Issued 21 st December 2010 Updated appendices issued: 23 rd Dec & 11 th January

Download Presentation

DCMF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Dcmf

DCMF

  • WSB Update

  • EDCM Consultation

  • Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair


Edcm consultation

EDCM Consultation

  • EDCM Consultation workshop:

  • Held 13th January at ELEXON.

  • 65 attendees.

  • EDCM Consultation:

  • Issued 21st December 2010

  • Updated appendices issued:

    • 23rd Dec &

    • 11th January

  • Consultation closed 1st February 2011.

15 February 2011


Consultation responses

Consultation responses

  • Responses received from 28 stakeholders:

  • 3 DNOs

  • 2 IDNOs

  • 6 Suppliers

  • 6 Generators

  • 7 Customers

  • 4 Other organisations

  • Comprising:

  • 23 general response papers

  • 184 answers to the 15 questions in the consultation


Key comments

Key Comments

  • Stakeholders recognise the progress and work by DNOs since June 2010

  • Concerns:

    • Cost-reflectivity

    • Inclusion of 2 different methodologies (LRIC, FCP)

    • Demand scaling method and high percentage of total costs

    • Justification of charges

    • Fairly even split between voltage level and site specific options

    • Need for capping seen as a failure of the methodology (although customers were in favour of capping!)


Key comments continued

Key Comments (continued)

  • Concerns continued:

  • Scaling of generation charges

  • Distinction between:

    • intermittent/non-intermittent generation and

    • on-shore/off-shore generation

  • Volatility and predictability of charges

  • Pre-2005 generation compensation unknown

    • Awaiting Ofgem decision

  • Failure to address issues raised to June consultation

  • Specific illustrative charges – some are significantly higher


A stakeholder comment

A stakeholder comment

  • “In conclusion; this evolution is much better than that rightly delayed last summer.

  • It remains, however, an inelegant solution to a question that many EHV users would have been happy not to ask”!


Next steps

Next Steps

  • Review the responses and reflect as appropriate in EDCM

  • Publish a Summary of Consultation responses on ENA website

15 February 2011

7 | Energy Networks Association


  • Login