slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
DCMF

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

DCMF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 75 Views
  • Uploaded on

DCMF. WSB Update EDCM Consultation Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair. EDCM Consultation. EDCM Consultation workshop: Held 13 th January at ELEXON. 65 attendees. EDCM Consultation: Issued 21 st December 2010 Updated appendices issued: 23 rd Dec & 11 th January

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' DCMF' - karleigh-williams


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
DCMF
  • WSB Update
  • EDCM Consultation
  • Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair
edcm consultation
EDCM Consultation
  • EDCM Consultation workshop:
  • Held 13th January at ELEXON.
  • 65 attendees.
  • EDCM Consultation:
  • Issued 21st December 2010
  • Updated appendices issued:
    • 23rd Dec &
    • 11th January
  • Consultation closed 1st February 2011.

15 February 2011

consultation responses
Consultation responses
  • Responses received from 28 stakeholders:
  • 3 DNOs
  • 2 IDNOs
  • 6 Suppliers
  • 6 Generators
  • 7 Customers
  • 4 Other organisations
  • Comprising:
  • 23 general response papers
  • 184 answers to the 15 questions in the consultation
key comments
Key Comments
  • Stakeholders recognise the progress and work by DNOs since June 2010
  • Concerns:
    • Cost-reflectivity
    • Inclusion of 2 different methodologies (LRIC, FCP)
    • Demand scaling method and high percentage of total costs
    • Justification of charges
    • Fairly even split between voltage level and site specific options
    • Need for capping seen as a failure of the methodology (although customers were in favour of capping!)
key comments continued
Key Comments (continued)
  • Concerns continued:
  • Scaling of generation charges
  • Distinction between:
    • intermittent/non-intermittent generation and
    • on-shore/off-shore generation
  • Volatility and predictability of charges
  • Pre-2005 generation compensation unknown
    • Awaiting Ofgem decision
  • Failure to address issues raised to June consultation
  • Specific illustrative charges – some are significantly higher
a stakeholder comment
A stakeholder comment
  • “In conclusion; this evolution is much better than that rightly delayed last summer.
  • It remains, however, an inelegant solution to a question that many EHV users would have been happy not to ask”!
next steps
Next Steps
  • Review the responses and reflect as appropriate in EDCM
  • Publish a Summary of Consultation responses on ENA website

15 February 2011

7 | Energy Networks Association