1 / 15

Following the Money: Comparing Parliamentary Public Accounts Committees

Following the Money: Comparing Parliamentary Public Accounts Committees. 1. The Structure of PACs (a). The “Old Story” Size matters (of legislature & PACs) Number of staff important Adequate representation of opposition parties in PAC Political affiliation of the Chair.

Download Presentation

Following the Money: Comparing Parliamentary Public Accounts Committees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Following the Money: Comparing Parliamentary Public Accounts Committees

  2. 1. The Structure of PACs (a) The “Old Story” • Size matters (of legislature & PACs) • Number of staff important • Adequate representation of opposition parties in PAC • Political affiliation of the Chair

  3. 1. The Structure of PACs (b) The “New Story” • Size little changed – but not so important; more important – how willing the PAC is to perform oversight • % of opposition members varies from 7.2% in West Africa to 50.5% in Australia & NZ • Party affiliation of chair may not be critical • Political fragmentation may undermine importance

  4. 2. The Activities of PACs (a) The “Old Story” • Organizational features/characteristics matter • Committee practices matter • Indicator – frequency with which certain results were achieved • Number of meetings held • Subjects covered • Reports produced

  5. 2. The Activities of PACs (b) The “New Story” • Updated information – more comprehensive and detailed account of what PACs do • Demonstrated link between PAC activity and PAC output • Demonstrated that all PAC activities tend to go hand in hand and that some activities are more important than others

  6. . Number of PAC reports and ability to control of corruption

  7. PAC Reports & GNI per Capita

  8. Bottom line • PAC effectiveness is a cause, and not a consequence, of good governance • What makes PACs work in some regions has no impact on PAC performance in other regions

  9. 3. The Capacity of PACs (a) The “Old Story” • Bipartisan approach • Enormous diversity • Link between AG and PAC is significant • Most common; PAG work focuses on AG report, rather than on examining the public accounts

  10. 3. The Capacity of PACs (b) The “New Story” • Prior assumption that PAC powers were similar around the globe is false, they differ in two significant aspects • Right of access • PAC powers Also, capacity and resources: • Staff and funding

  11. EG

  12. 4. Small Country PACs • Good working relationship with AG critical • Small 3; recommend 4-10 • Joint committee, if two chambers • Close working relationship with other policy review committees • Co-opt non-parliamentarians?

  13. 5. Changing world of PACs:3 transformations • Emergence of new and non-Commonwealth PACs • New role and modus operandi for new PACs • New role and modus operandi for old PACs • Plus…Questioning of “traditional model”

  14. 6. Emergence of new and non-Commonwealth PACs • Afghanistan • Bhutan • Denmark • Ethiopia • Federated States of Micronesia • Finland • Israel • Indonesia • Kosovo • Liberia • Morocco • Myanmar • Nepal • Rwanda • Southern Sudan • Thailand • Turkey

  15. 7. What does this mean for CoC GPG? International Initiatives: • GIFT • Parliamentary Benchmarks • Work undertaken by other PAC networks Where is the SADC/ EAC CoCinitiative: • Identified challenges that good practice needs to be distilled around • SADCOPAC/ EAAPAC good practice guides

More Related