MACROECONOMICS. 2010 FRQ. Norman. 2010 FRQ. 1. Assume that the U.S. economy is currently in long-run equilibrium. (a) Draw a correctly labeled graph of aggregate demand and aggregate supply and show each of the following. ( i ) The long-run aggregate supply curve
1. Assume that the U.S. economy is currently in long-run equilibrium.
(a) Draw a correctly labeled graph of aggregate demand and aggregate supply and
show each of the following.
(i) The long-run aggregate supply curve
(ii) The current equilibrium output & price levels, labeled as YE and PLE, respectively.
(b) Assume that the government increases spending on national defense without
(i) On your graph in part (a), show how the government action affects AD.
(ii) How will this government action affect the unemployment rate in the short run?
Answer: 1. (b) (i) As can be seen on the graph, the increase in G would increase
AD to AD2, increasing PL and Y.
1. (b) (II) The increase in AD to AD2 would decrease unemployment in
the short run, as the increase in AD would lead to an increase in output & profits,
resulting in more workers being hired and therefore the decrease in unemployment.
1. (c) Assume that the economy adjusts to a new long-run equilibrium after the
increase in government spending.
(i) How will the short-run aggregate supply curve in the new long-run equilibrium
compare with that in the initial long-run equilibrium in part (a) ? Explain.
(ii) On your graph in part (a), label the new long-run equilibrium price level as PL2.
Answer: 1. (c) (i) The increase in AD will result in more inflation and workers
demanding higher wages. This increase in resource cost at contract time in
the long run would move the SRAS to the left.
(c) (ii) PL2, as shown on the above graph, is a higher PL than PLE.
1. (d) In order to finance the increase in government spending on national defense from
part (b), the government borrows funds from the public. Using a correctly labeled
graph of the loanable funds market, show the effect of the government’s borrowing
on the real interest rate.
(e) Given the change in the real interest rate in part (d), what is the impact on each of
(ii) Economic growth rate. Explain.
Mankiw users: Increasing government borrowing reduces the supply of private loanable funds. Interest Rates would also go up, and investment would decrease.
Real Interest Rate, (%)
Quantity of Loanable Funds
often for transactions and demand less money.
(a) Using a correctly labeled graph of the money market, show how the nominal
interest rate will be affected.
(b) Given the interest rate change in part (a), what will happen to bond prices in the
Answer to 2. (a) The decrease in Dt for money
would decrease the Dm curve resulting in a
lower NIR and RIR.
2. (b) Bond prices are inverse to the interest
rate so bond prices would increase
Answer to 2. (c) The lower IR will increase
AD due to more investment and interest
sensitive consumption [the lower IR would
also depreciate the dollar and increase Xn].
All 3 cause an increase in AD & PL in the SR.
2. (d) Selling bonds would be the OMO as
it would increase NIR and decrease AD & PL.
Nominal Interest Rate
(c) Given the interest rate change in part (a), what will happen to the price level in the
short run? Explain.
(d) Identify an open-market operation the Fed could use to keep the nominal interest
rate constant at the level that existed before the drop in credit card fees. Explain.
3. A United States firm sells $10 million worth of goods to a firm in Argentina,
where the currency is the peso.
(a) How will the transaction above affect Argentina’s aggregate demand?
(b) Assume that the United States current account balance with Argentina is
initially zero. How will the transaction above affect the United States current
account balance? Explain.
Answer to 3. (a) The selling of $10 M of U.S. goods to Argentina would
decrease Argentina’s net exports which would decrease their AD.
AD = C+I+G+X-M, when M gets larger, GDP gets smaller.
3. (b) The $10 million increase in net exports would cause a flow of $10
million worth of pesos into the U.S. [recorded as a +$10 million]
and would cause a current account balance of ZERO to become a
+$10 million surplus account balance.
2010 FRQ a firm in Argentina,
Answer to 3. (c) (i): If the U.S.
decrease financial investment in Argentina, the U.S. would decrease their supply of dollars to Argentina, resulting in a decrease in demand for the peso.
(c) (ii) As shown on the graph, the dollar would appreciate.
P looking for $’s
$’s looking for P
Peso Price ofDollar
(d) The cheaper prices in the U.S. will result in more demand for U.S. goods and therefore the dollar, appreciating the dollar and depreciating the peso.
Quantity of Dollars
3. (c) Using a correctly labeled graph of the foreign exchange market for the U.S. dollar,
show how a decrease in the U.S. financial investment in Argentina affects each.
(i) The supply of United States dollars
(ii) The value of the United States dollar relative to the peso
(d) Suppose that the inflation rate is 3% in the U.S. and 5% in Argentina. What will
happen to the value of the peso relative to the United States dollar as a result of
the difference in inflation rates?
Econ FRQs a firm in Argentina,
How To Score
Well On FRQs
FRQs for Dummies