1 / 17

The b -delayed deuteron-decay of 6 He

The b -delayed deuteron-decay of 6 He. J. Ponsaers , R. Raabe, F. Aksouh, D. Smirnov, I. Mukha, A. Sanchez, M. Huyse, P. Van Duppen, C. Angulo, O. Ivanov, J.C. Thomas. Introduction Experiment Analysis Conclusion. E. E. Probability density of a halo neutron.

Download Presentation

The b -delayed deuteron-decay of 6 He

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The b-delayed deuteron-decayof 6He J. Ponsaers, R. Raabe, F. Aksouh, D. Smirnov, I. Mukha, A. Sanchez, M. Huyse, P. Van Duppen, C. Angulo, O. Ivanov, J.C. Thomas • Introduction • Experiment • Analysis • Conclusion

  2. E E Probability density of a halo neutron Usual probability density of a neutron r r 6He 6He = 2n-halo-nucleus Discovered in 1985: high interaction cross section.[1] Extended matter distribution. 6He is a Borromean system of a + n + n [1] : Tanihata I. et al. ; Phys. Rev. Letters (1985)

  3. II I E E Probability density of a halo neutron Usual probability density of a neutron r r 6He 6He = 2n-halo-nucleus Discovered in 1985: high interaction cross section.[1] Extended matter distribution. 6He is a Borromean system of a + n + n [1] : Tanihata I. et al. ; Phys. Rev. Letters (1985)

  4. II I E E Probability density of a halo neutron Usual probability density of a neutron r r 6He 6He = 2n-halo-nucleus Discovered in 1985: high interaction cross section.[1] Extended matter distribution. 6He is a Borromean system of a + n + n • We want to measure: • Branching ratio of the decay channel II: • very small (~10-6)  very difficult • Energy spectrum of the decay • particlesEa+d [1] : Tanihata I. et al. ; Phys. Rev. Letters (1985)

  5. Information provided by the deuteron-branch of 6He • High branching ratio  dineutron correlation

  6. Information provided by the deuteron-branch of 6He • High branching ratio  dineutron correlation • Low branching ratio  cigar correlation

  7. Information provided by the deuteron-branch of 6He • High branching ratio  dineutron correlation • Low branching ratio  cigar correlation [1] K. Riisager et al., Phys. Lett. B 235(1990)30 [2] M. J. G. Borge et al., Nucl. Phys. A 560(1993)664 [3] D. Anthony et al. Phys., Rev. C 65(2002)034310 [ 4] P. Descouvement and C. Leclercq- Willain, J. Phys. G 18(1992)L99 [5] M. V. Zhukov et al., Phys. Rev. C 47(1993)2937 [6] A. Csoto and D. Baye, Phys. Rev. C 49(1994)818 [6] suggests that we need a detailed description of the wave functions to explain the decay.

  8. The method • Problems in previous experiments: • High threshold energies for deuterons • Large uncertainties (difficult to normalize)

  9. The method • Problems in previous experiments: • High threshold energies for deuterons • Large uncertainties (difficult to normalize) • New method: 6He implantation in DSSSD • (Double Sided Silicon Strip Detector) • This can count implantations AND a + d decays

  10. The method • Problems in previous experiments: • High threshold energies for deuterons • Large uncertainties (difficult to normalize) • New method: 6He implantation in DSSSD • (Double Sided Silicon Strip Detector) • This can count implantations AND a + d decays DSSSD divided into 48 strips x 48 strips = 2304 pixels Small pixel size (300mm) • Get the energy drop of b-particles below the spectrum of the br.ratio • No problem for a + d detection

  11. The experiment Experiment: performed at CRC, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 6He nuclei at 8 MeV periodically implanted into DSSSD detector. Beam on (1s): implantation and detection of 6He nuclei number of implantations counted absolute normalization for br.rat. very accurate Beam off (2s): detection of decay of 6He nuclei caught inside the detector

  12. 2 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) Beam on + off E (keV) Analysis 1. b-peak 2. 6He implants 3. partial E-collection 3

  13. 2 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) Beam on + off E (keV) Analysis 1. b-peak 2. 6He implants 3. partial E-collection 4. a + d events 1 3 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) 4 Time spectrum exp. fit 1: T1/2 = 806.0ms Beam off E (keV)

  14. 2 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) Beam on + off E (keV) Suspicious: background much higher than expected! Analysis 1. b-peak 2. 6He implants 3. partial E-collection 4. a + d events 1 3 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) 4 Time spectrum exp. fit 1: T1/2 = 806.0ms Beam off E (keV)

  15. 2 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) Beam on + off E (keV) Suspicious: background much higher than expected! Analysis 1. b-peak 2. 6He implants 3. partial E-collection 4. a + d events 1 3 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) 4 Time spectrum exp. fit 1: T1/2 = 806.0ms 2: T1/2 = 1102ms Beam off E (keV) 4 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) 4 Beam off E (keV)

  16. 2 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) Beam on + off E (keV) 1 (Number of events)/(10keV) Beam off E (keV) Analysis 1. b-peak 2. 6He implants 3. partial E-collection 4. a + d events 1 3 Suspicious: background much higher than expected! 4 Time spectrum exp. fit 1: T1/2 = 806.0ms 2: T1/2 = 1102ms 4 1 2.New fit: (Number of events)/(10keV) 4 162 ± 69 background events 425 a + d events Beam off E (keV)

  17. Conclusion and outlook • Total branching ratio: W = (2.03 ± 0.35) x 10-6 • Corresponds with the value from microscopic description • Large uncertainty from background events. • No reliable energy spectrum of a + d because we don’t know the energy spectrum of the background. • New measurement on 6He in Louvain-la-Neuve • Same experiment on 11Li at TRIUMF

More Related