1 / 19

Electron Flow in AuAu@200GeV

Electron Flow in AuAu@200GeV. Frank Laue ( laue@bnl.gov ) for the STAR Collaboration. Outline Motivation Analysis (Preliminary) Results Outlook. 200GeV (old) Au+Au minimum bias trigger. Motivators. Kai Schweda STAR QM2004. All mesons behave the same All baryons behave the same

kareem
Download Presentation

Electron Flow in AuAu@200GeV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electron Flow in AuAu@200GeV Frank Laue(laue@bnl.gov) for the STAR Collaboration • Outline • Motivation • Analysis • (Preliminary) Results • Outlook 200GeV (old) Au+Au minimum bias trigger

  2. Motivators Kai Schweda STAR QM2004 • All mesons behave the same • All baryons behave the same • Mesons behave differently from baryons • NCQ scaling • dynamic governed by partonic phase, which is observed after coalescence/recombination of quarks ? Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  3. Motivators Fries,Mueller,Nonaka,Bass nucl-th/0308051 • NCQ scaling doesn’t work everywhere ? • v2 is very sensitive probe Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  4. Questions/Problems • Data suggests NCQ scaling (coalescence,recombination) for Elliptic Flow and RCP ! Partonic Phase (hey, ho the QGP!) • What about hydro-dynamics ? (governed by mass, not NCQ) • successful spectra (Tkin,f), Nu Xu plot (Teff vs mass)!radial flow • Radial / Elliptic Flowboth caused butpressure, shouldn’t they scale similarly ? • Why does NCQ scaling works so good at higher pT (phasespace scarcely populated, coalescence less likely) • s(trongly interacting)QGP, parton-hydrodynamics ? • u,d¼ 5MeV; s¼150MeV, c¼1.5GeV • ! look at charm, both in partonic and hadronic world the charm is very heavy; should be very sensitive Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  5. Line of Thought • Can not measure Charm-Flow directly (yet) • Do D-Meson decay electrons reflect the D-Meson flow ? • Electron Identification • Where do the Electrons come from ? • Backgrounds from • misidentification (contamination) • physics processes (0! e+e- +  B.R. 1.198%) • detector effects ( ! e+e- : few %, dep. on material) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  6. Do Decay-Electrons Reflect the Parent Flow ?Electron vs D Momenta pD-Meson (GeV/c) pD-Meson (GeV/c) pelectron (GeV/c) pelectron (GeV/c) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  7. Do Decay-Electrons Reflect the Parent Flow ? vs D Momenta D-Electron D-Electron pD-Meson (GeV/c) pelectron (GeV/c) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  8. Do Decay-Electrons Reflect the Parent Flow ?Pythia/Mevsim Simulation • 0 (input) • e§ v2 % v2 % • D0 (input) • e§ pT / (GeV/c) pT / (GeV/c) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  9. Fraction of electrons from: • 0! e+ + e- +  • D ! e§ + X d2N/(dpdy) (a.u.) F pelectron (GeV/c) pelectron (GeV/c) Where Do The Electron Come From ?(Pythia) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  10. Where Do The Electron Come From ?(Pythia, STAR Simulation/Analysis Chain) Pythia 6.2 Heavy Quarks turned on GStar Reconstruction Track Associations  0 , D0,D§ | eta | < 1 DCA < 2cm 23 < #fit-Points < 100 20 < #dEdx-Points < 100 K0L K0 Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  11. - + dE/dx/(KeV) dE/dx/(KeV) log10(p/(GeV/c) log10(p/(GeV/c) TPC dE/dx vs p e+ Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  12. Electron Selection • “clean” electrons between the blue lines •  conversion removed via invariant mass method (~50% efficiency) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  13. - dE/dx/(KeV) log10(p/(GeV/c) Deuteron Contamination (preliminary) <20% contam raw-yield p/(GeV/c) • 2x as many deuterons and anti-deuterons • 2x(3) more electrons(positrons) than extrapolated (anti-)deuterons • more than ½ of (anti-)deuterons out of dEdx band Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  14. dN/dmass v2 % pT/(GeV/c) mass/(GeV/c2) -conversions and 0-Dalitz Decays 0! e+ + e- +  ~50-80% of ’s can be removed with invariant mass method Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  15. black = electrons+positrons electrons positrons V2 vs pT pT/(GeV/c) cos(2(-)) pT/(GeV/c) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  16. STAR Preliminary PHENIX PRELIMINARY Flow of electrons (charm): v2 from PHENIX & STAR Slightly different dE/dx cut: 3.4<dE/dx<5.0 • Au+Au @200GeV • Run II • Run IV (fast offline) Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  17. Outlook / To-Do-List • Quantitative measurements • contaminations and background (yields) • measure flow of contam./ background • ! non-photonic v2 • deuteron flow (constituent model) • 100x better statistics in Run IV (already on tape) • centrality dependence • reduce backgrounds by 80% with tighter cuts • EMC electron analysis is already prepared • too low statistics for 62GeV • higher pT , bkg reduction • Pixel Vertex Detector (¼ 100m Vertex Resolution) • (almost) background free identification of D/B-Mesons Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  18. Yields vs (phi-psi) black = electrons red = fit to electronsblue = hadrons Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

  19. Electron v2 all charges electrons positrons Frank Laue, BNL (laue@bnl.gov)

More Related