1 / 15

Parity Violation in Weak Interaction

Parity Violation in Weak Interaction. The q - t puzzle : the beginning of doubt Lee and Yang proposal : violation of PC in weak interaction Wu experiment : proof of PC violation The meson decay : confirmation of PC violation. October 24th , 2003. Lopez Bruno. q + g p + + p 0

kana
Download Presentation

Parity Violation in Weak Interaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Parity Violation in Weak Interaction The q-t puzzle : the beginning of doubt Lee and Yang proposal : violation of PC in weak interaction Wu experiment : proof of PC violation The meson decay : confirmation of PC violation October 24th, 2003 Lopez Bruno

  2. q+g p+ + p0 t+g p+ + p+ + p- The q-t puzzle • In 1947 Powell identified the p-meson in his cloud chamber. • g Formulation of the weak interaction theory • Two years later, he observed two decays of the k+ meson which called into question the parity conservation • Experimental data indicate indentical masses and life times for q and t particules. • g q and t seemed to be the same particule

  3. In 1953, Dalitz argued that since the pion parity was (-1) two pions would combine to produce a (+1) parity three pions would combine to produce a (-1) parity (-1).(-1) = (+1) (-1).(-1).(-1) = (-1) g If parity is conserved, qand t can not be the same particule • The conclusion was either q and t are different particules or parity is not conserved. • g this is the q-t puzzle

  4. Lee and Yang proposal • In 1956 Lee and Yang suggested a proposal for ending the q-t puzzle. g Violation of parity in weak interaction • « Existing experiment do indicates parity conservation in strong and electromagnetic interactions to a high degree of accuracy. » • « Past experiments on the weak interactions had actually no bearing on the question of parity conservation. »

  5. If parity is not stricly conserved atomic and nuclear states become mixtures of the normal states with a small percentage of states of opposite parity. F is the fractional weight of these states. g F caracterizes the degree of violation of parity conservation • Experimental limits are F2< 10– 4. In a proton beam polarized perpendiculary to its momentum and scattered by a nuclei, the scattered intensity in two direction A and B are in the proportion: ( 1 + F ) / ( 1 - F) if the scattering originates from a parity-conserving and a parity-nonconserving interaction. The experimental result reguires F < 10-2, or F2< 10-4

  6. Experimental proof of parity conservation need an accuracy of F2< 10 – 24. Parity violation implies states of opposite parity. It could therefore possess an electric dipole moment of a magnetude: M = e G2(dimension of syst.) Where G = F2 is the coupling strength of the decay interaction. Since all the weak interactions are characterized by a coupling strength G < 10-12, a violation of parity will introduce a parity mixing characterized by an F2< 10-24. • Lee and Yang suggested possible experimental tests of parity conservation: g b-decay of the Cobalt 60 g p and m decay

  7. Experimental test of parity conservation in b-decay of CO60 • Observation of spacial asymmetry in emission of b-decay electrons from CO60. • g Lead to a distinction between b-decay and it’s mirror-image process. • Angular distribution of electrons coming from b-decay of polarized nuclei: • I(q) = cst( 1+a cosq )sinq dq • Where a is proportionnal to the interference term between the parity-conserving and the parity-nonconserving interactions, and q the angle between the parent nuclei orientation and the momentum of the electron.

  8. An asymmetry of ditribution between q and 1800-q implies that parity is not conserved. • a is obtained by mesuring the fractionnal asymmetry between q<900 and q>900 : p/2 p p a =[I(q) dq - I(q) dq]/ I(q) dq p/2 0 0 If a = 0 parity is conserved. If a≠ 0 parity is not conserved. The magnetic field used for orienting the nuclei cause a spacial separation between the electron emitted with q<900 and q>900

  9. A thin layer of CO60 is placed inside a vacuum chambre. • An anthracene crystal detect b particules. • CO60 nuclei is polarized by the Rose-Gorter method. • The degree of polarization is detected by mesuring the anisotropy the g-rays.

  10. Very low temperature were necessary to align spin orientation. g Adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator • It use the properties of heat and the magnetc properties of atoms. Atoms have internal magnetic field which will align themself with an external magnetic field. g Transformation of thermal energy into magnetic energy • Liquid helium remove the heat produced by magnetisation.

  11. A large asymmetry was observed ! • The time for disappearance of the b asymmetry coincides well with that of g anisotropy. • b and g distrbution are different with reversal of the demagnetzation field, so with reversed nuclei orientation. g Difference between the real world and the mirror one. • Indeed they found a = 0.4 g Proof of violation of parity conservation.

  12. Experimental test of parity conservation in the decay of p and m mesons • Lee and Yang suggested that the violation of parity conservation could be prooved in the study of the decays: p+g m+ + n+ (1) m+ge+ + 2n (2) • If parity is not conserved in (1), the muon emitted from the stopped pion will be polarized in its direction of motion. • The angular distibution of electrons in (2) serves as a analyzer for the muon polarization, and hence, indicates whether or not parity is conserved. • Polarization of the muons also offers a way of determining the magnetic moment.

  13. The p-meson beam is extracted from a cyclotron in the conventional way. • Eight inches of carbon are used in the entance to separate the muons. • The stopping of a m is signalled by a fast 1-2 coincidence count. Registration time is about 1.25 msec with a 0.75 msec delay. • The b-decay of the muon is detected by the electron telescope 3-4. It register electrons > 25 Mev. g The system counts electrons of energy > 25 Mev which are born between 0.75 and 2.0 msec after the muon stopping.

  14. If a magnetic field is applied, the muons are created with a large polarization in the direction of motion and the process of slowing down and stopping do not depolarized them. • g the electrons emitted from m decay have an angular asymmetry about the polarization direction. • The consequences of these observations are that in the reactions (1) and (2), parity is not conserved. • They also set the ratio of the magnetic moment of m+ particule to 2.00 + 0.10. - The violation of parity conservation have been confirmed !!!

  15. References: • « Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions » T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang Phy. Rev. 104 (1956) • « Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay » C. S. Wu Phy. Rev. 105 (1957) • « Observation of the Failyre of Parity Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugason in Meson Decays : the Magnetic Moment of Free Muon » • R. L. Garwin, L. M. Lederman, and M. Weinrich • Phy. Rev. 105 (1957)

More Related