1 / 5

Costing and Cost Effective Analysis

Costing and Cost Effective Analysis. Group I. Project E. Number of people benefited – 500,000 Cost Benefit Ratio - 100 DALY’s averted – 10,000 Politically Appealing . Project D. Number of people benefited - 20 Cost Benefit Ratio - 4000 DALY’s averted – 1000

kami
Download Presentation

Costing and Cost Effective Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Costing and Cost Effective Analysis Group I

  2. Project E • Number of people benefited – 500,000 • Cost Benefit Ratio - 100 • DALY’s averted – 10,000 • Politically Appealing

  3. Project D • Number of people benefited - 20 • Cost Benefit Ratio - 4000 • DALY’s averted – 1000 • Focused and importance given to special focused groups • Second cost benefit ratio

  4. Project A • Number of people benefited – 100,000 • Cost Benefit Ratio - 5000 • DALY’s averted - 1000 • Emphasis on Primary Health Care • Community Appealing

  5. Conclusions Appropriate selection of the projects was due to : • 12, 000 DALY’s were averted • Allotted amount was utilized fully • Benefited 600,020 people • Project F was very cost ineffective since it averted only 40 DALYs and only 20 beneficiaries • Eliminated Project C since it spends 10 million and one only averts only 2000 DALY’s • We selected the most cost effective projects

More Related