1 / 11

The use of linear programming for the allocation of scarce resources

LEARNING NOTE 11.1. The use of linear programming for the allocation of scarce resources. LN11.1 (1a). Linear programming. LN11.1 (1b). Example (cont.). LN11.1 (2). Materials constraint (8Y + 4Z  3,440 (When Y= 0, Z = 860; when Z= 0, Y = 430. LN11.1 (3).

kamella-varga
Download Presentation

The use of linear programming for the allocation of scarce resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LEARNING NOTE 11.1 The use of linear programming for the allocation of scarce resources

  2. LN11.1 (1a) Linear programming

  3. LN11.1 (1b) Example (cont.)

  4. LN11.1 (2) Materials constraint (8Y + 4Z  3,440 (When Y= 0, Z = 860; when Z= 0, Y = 430

  5. LN11.1 (3) Labour constraint 6Y + 8Z  2,880 (when Z = 0, Y = 480; when Y = 0, Z = 360)

  6. LN11.1 (4) Machine capacity constraint 4Y + 6Z  2,760 (when Z = 0, Y = 690; when y = 0, Z = 460)

  7. LN11.1 (5) Sales limitation Y  420

  8. LN11.1 (6) Optimum solution Feasible production combination = Area ABCDE

  9. LN11.1 (7a) Optimum solution 1. The optimum output can be determined by solving the simultaneous equations that intersect at point C: 8Y + 4Z = 3 440 6Y + 8Z = 2 880 so that Y = 400 and Z = 60

  10. LN11.1 (7b) Optimum solution 2. The materials and labour constraints are binding and therefore have opportunity costs. The marginal contribution from obtaining one extra unit of materials can be calculated by solving the following equations: 8Y + 4Z = 3 441 (revised materials constraint) 6Y + 8Z = 2 880 (unchanged labour constraint) Y = 400.2 units, Z = 59.85 units Therefore the planned output of Y would be increased by 0.2 units and Z reduced by 0.15 units and contribution will increase by £0.40 (the opportunity cost).

  11. LN11.1 (7c) Optimum solution 3. The marginal contribution from obtaining one extra labour hour can be found in a similar way: 8Y + 4Z = 3 400 (unchanged materials constraint) 6Y + 8Z = 2 881 (revised labour constraint) Y = 399.9 and Z = 60.2 Marginal contribution = £1.80

More Related